Conquest and the Law in Swedish Livonia (ca. 1630-1710), Heikki Pihlajamäki offers an exciting account of the law and judiciary in seventeenth-century Livonia. Immediately after Sweden conquered the province in the 1620s, a reorganization of the Livonian judiciary began. Its legal order became largely modelled after Swedish law, which differed in important ways from its Livonian counterpart. While Livonian legal tradition was firmly anchored in the European
ius commune, the conquerors’ law was, by nature, not founded in legal learning. The volume convincingly demonstrates how the differences in legal cultures decisively affected the way Livonian judicial and procedural systems were shaped. Based on archival sources, the study presents an important contribution to the comparative legal history of the early modern period.
italicus . Their legal work also had an impact in other European countries such as Holland, Germany, England and, of course, in France. 39 The evolution of commercial law was now linked to the rigorous iuscommune frame of reference. Moreover, a few specialized Italian courts, such as the Florentine
entity of England, but its jurisdiction covered also other territories of the United Kingdom, including Scotland. The development of the Scots law owed much to the iuscommune tradition and therefore also to Roman law. The judicial panels – the Law Lords’ who were deciding the particular cases – were
or Jumping Board? , Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis , 77 ( 2009 ), 459 – 479 . Dave D e ruysscher : Innovating Financial Law in the Early Modern Netherlands and Europe: Transfers of Commercial Paper and Recourse Liability in Legislation and IusCommune (Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries
has invoked the concept of iuscommune , widespread in Ancient Rome. 2 Most likely, there is no better model for such unification within private law than the institution of acquisitive prescription, or usucaption, regarding which there exists a time-honoured, unwritten and global agreement as to its