Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 1,176 items for :

  • All: "European Court of Human Rights" x
  • Human Rights x
Clear All

Charlotte Helen Skeet

here illustrates the significance of gender in the Orientalist constructions of both the claimant and the state. It argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) not only fails to properly address rights claims by visibly-Muslim women, but also contributes to discrimination against visibly

Clíodhna Murphy

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 DOI: 10.1163/157181610X491178 European Journal of Migration and Law 12 (2010) 23–43 brill.nl/emil Th e Concept of Integration in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Clíodhna Murphy Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Integration has

Fulvia Staiano

extremely significant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights which – between 1996 and 2005 – assessed claims of violation of the right to family life ex art. 8 of the Convention brought by transnational parents excluded from family reunification with their children under Dutch immigration law. In

Kimberley Brayson

published a document stating its top priority to be ‘reforming the European Court of Human Rights and strengthening implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights’. 1 Despite the neutral language of this statement of intent, the aspirations of the uk government were revealed, exposing an

Kevin Aquilina

? The case law of the European Court of Human Rights 3 (ECtHR) originally answered the question in the negative. But recently the ECtHR has turned over a new leaf and is answering the same question in the affirmative. This paper studies the recent case law of the ECtHR by examining its progressive

Ivana Radačić

legal and political controversy. Two types of cases have been litigated before the European Court of Human Rights (the Court): those concerning the wearing of the Islamic headscarf in schools and universities by pupils/students and teachers, and those concerning the presence of the crucifix on the walls

Anicée Van Engeland

expectations and demands stemming from their beliefs or their community, the other dictated by courts, such as the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and by domestic law. 3 Women are told both to veil and not to veil, and their access to the public sphere is monitored, if not restricted. As a result

Series:

Nina-Louisa Arold

While the supervision of the European Court of Human Rights constantly grows in importance, little is known about the people, especially the judges, inside the Court. To what extent are human rights sensitive to different traditions and is their work burdened through the plurality of legal, historical-political or vocational experiences among the judges? Looking at the first three years of permanent operation of the Court, this book suggests that it is the legal culture that brings the judges together. Based on interviews, field study observations and an analysis of case law, this book takes a novel approach on European human rights law and provides researchers and practitioners with an important basis for a full understanding of the Strasbourg case law.

Dominik Haider

Structural human rights deficiencies in the member states of the European Convention of Human Rights have caused numerous individual applications to the European Court of Human Rights and are a considerable factor in the Court's persistent overload crisis. The Pilot-Judgment Procedure was devised to tackle these structural deficiencies and has become an important instrument of the Court.

Dominik Haider examines to which extent the Pilot-Judgment Procedure is reconcilable with the European Convention on Human Rights. After an analysis of the member states’ obligations to resolve structural deficiencies, the author asks if the European Court of Human Rights is empowered to take the procedural steps which are characteristic of the Pilot-Judgment Procedure. In particular, the Court's express orders are critically scrutinised.

Femke Vogelaar

1 Introduction Country of Origin Information ( coi ) is essential in the assessment of the need for international protection. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has developed standards with regard to the use of coi in its case law under Article 3 of the European Convention of Human