Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 187 items for :

  • All: "Talmud" x
  • Philosophy of Religion x
Clear All

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2012 JJTP 20.1 Also available online – brill.nl/jjtp DOI: 10.1163/147728512X629790 WHO THINKS IN THE TALMUD? Sergey Dolgopolski University at Buffalo, SUNY Abstract This article traces a historical shift, and in particular its erasure from memory on the intellectual

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

relationship between memory and sacred space in the wake of exile, though the descriptions of the pilgrimage festivals in the talmudic passages read more like fantasy than memory, far from an objective or historical account. In the rabbis’ own terms, however, the stories of the ark are fashioned as memory

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

present the temporal concepts of permanence and endurance. I do argue that increased conceptualization in the Babylonian Talmud, especially in the editorial layer, increases frequency of metaphoric applications of קבע. But rabbis using this root from the tannaitic period onward seem to have been

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
Jewish and Christian Essays on the God of the Bible and Talmud
Editors: Yoram Hazony and Dru Johnson
Philosophers have often described theism as the belief in the existence of a “perfect being”—a being that is said to possess all possible perfections, so that it is all-powerful, all-knowing, immutable, perfectly good, perfectly simple, and necessarily existent, among other qualities. But such a theology is difficult to reconcile with the God we find in the Bible and Talmud. The Question of God’s Perfection brings together leading scholars from the Jewish and Christian traditions to critically examine the theology of perfect being in light of the Hebrew Bible and classical rabbinic sources. Contributors are James A. Diamond, Lenn E. Goodman, Edward C. Halper, Yoram Hazony, Dru Johnson, Brian Leftow, Berel Dov Lerner, Alan L. Mittleman, Heather C. Ohaneson, Randy Ramal, Eleonore Stump, Alex Sztuden, and Joshua I. Weinstein.

© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2006 JJTP 14,1–2 1 Muki Tsur and Avraham Shapira, “With Gershom Scholem: An Interview,” trans. Moshe Kohn, Gerschom Scholem, On Jews and Judaism in Crisis , ed. Werner J. Dannahuser (New York: Schocken, 1976), 31–32. IS THERE A WARRANT FOR LEVINAS’S TALMUDIC

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

CONTENTS Articles Hanoch Ben Pazi ...................................................................... 1 Rebuilding the Feminine in Levinas’s Talmudic Reading Joshua Parens .............................................................................. 33 Maimonidean Ethics Revisited

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
Why a Philosophical Analysis Elucidates the Historical Discourse
This volume moves beyond the mainstream scholarly scepticism over the Christ of Faith and considers if there is sufficient evidence to establish the existence of the more mundane Historical Jesus. Using the logical tools of the analytic philosopher, Lataster finds that the relevant sources are unreliable as historical documents, and that the key method of those purporting that the Historical Jesus existed is to appeal to sources that do not exist. Considering an ancient hypothesis suggesting that Jesus began as a celestial messiah that certain Second Temple Jews already believed in, and was later allegorised in the Gospels, Lataster discovers that it is more reasonable to at least be agnostic over Jesus’ historicity.

establishes an intriguing connection between idolatry and ontology. This connection is aptly illustrated by the biblical character of Balaam, the ambiguous Mesopotamian prophet or sorcerer of Numbers 22–24, who is almost never men- tioned in Levinas’s work but who is present, albeit hidden, in the talmudic

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
"The Study of Torah is Equal to them All"
In Rabbinic Discourse as a System of Knowledge Hannah Hashkes employs contemporary philosophy in describing rabbinic reasoning as a rational response to experience. Hashkes combines insights from the philosophy of Quine and Davidson with the semiotics of Peirce to construe knowledge as systematic reasoning occurring within a community of inquiry. Her reading of the works of Emmanuel Levinas and Jean-Luc Marion allows her to create a philosophical bridge between a discourse of God and a discourse of reason. This synthesis of pragmatism, hermeneutics and theology provides Hashkes with a sophisticated tool to understand Rabbinic Judaism. It also makes this study both unique and pathbreaking in contemporary Jewish philosophy and Rabbinic thought.

; hermeneutics; sampling; anomalous monism; technology; Talmud Theirs was a system that made a virtue of ambivalence and built uncertainty into bedrock assertions of faith. No wonder fundamental- ists and fascists have hated it so. – Jonathan Rosen, The Talmud and the Internet 1 Introduction For the ancient

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy