Search Results

system of law. China, once the hegemonic power of the region, also adopted civil law legal systems when it sought Japan’s support in the effort of modernizing the country in the 19th century. Later, the Communist revolution blocked the development of a legal system and the People’s Republic of China

In: Legislating for Equality

constantly challenges and reworks the very understanding of these concepts via encounters with their own alterity, the politics of human rights can be conceived as a space for radical political activity which is at its heart about maintaining contest over current hegemonic power relations. It is starting

In: International Human Rights Law Review
This rich and remarkable volume offers an overview of the most important schools, movements and trends which make up the theoretical landscape of contemporary international law, as well as the works of over 500 authors. It moves beyond generalization and examines how the relevant literature deals with the basic issues of the international legal system, such as international obligations, legitimacy, compliance, unity and universality, the rule of law, human rights, use of force and economics. It offers insights into the addressees (the state, international organizations, individuals and other private persons), and the construction of international law, including law-making, the relationship between norms, and interpretation. Moreover, it widens the discourse by addressing old, yet enduring, as well as new concerns about the functioning of the international legal system, and presents views of non-international lawyers and political scientists regarding that system. It is a valuable analysis for researchers, students, and practitioners.

rights protection. In either case, the Chinese government has been in no position to make use of human rights for its own advantages. Apart from this, widespread worries have emerged concerning China and whether it is becoming another hegemonic power as it grows in economic and military strength. Insofar

In: Confucianism and Reflexive Modernity

Charter as the main framework; the desire to maintain hegemonic power, and; the possibility to resort to pre-emptive action even if the threat against which the action was taken was not evidently imminent. Under president Barack Obama, multilateralism is being restored as a guiding principle, which augurs

In: Security and Human Rights

interpretation of authoritative rules and regulations into their application to social circumstances, or the way in which the machinery of the state creates, promotes, and reinforces certain narratives about social groups, produces space within which the hegemonic power is reinforced and reproduced. This

In: Journal of Law, Religion and State

institutional framework for allocating the costs. This is a concern that both realists and neoliberal institutions have voiced in relation to the ability and willingness of a hegemonic power to be the solution for the world’s collective action problems. In a high profile article in International Security , the

In: Global Responsibility to Protect

use of force and showed that it was prepared to damage France’s relationship with the world’s hegemonic power, to be the object of ‘French bashing,’ and to possibly endanger one of France’s key projects – the ‘European Defence’ 89 – in order to do so. One factor that has been underestimated by

In: Global Responsibility to Protect

opposing us global interests on issues such as non-nuclear proliferation, peaceful settlement in the Middle East, and terrorism. As Peter Smith describes, ‘Mexico’s strategic position has been severely restricted by the hegemonic power of the us . The simple fact is this: Those places where Mexico might

In: Global Responsibility to Protect

–85 ( 2013), p. 70. 8  ibid. , p. 67. 9 John Ikenberry and Charles Kupchan., ‘Socialization and Hegemonic Power’, ­International Organization 44:3 (1990). 10 Kathryn Sikkink, ‘Human Rights, Principled-Issue Networks and Sovereignty in Latin America’, International Organization 47

In: Global Responsibility to Protect