Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 11 items for :

  • All: "methodology" x
  • Pragmatics & Discourse Analysis x
  • Asian Philosophy x
Clear All

Series:

Volume-editor Bo Mou

comments and criticisms of Brons and Mou. Since their remarks are included in this issue of Comparative Philosophy , I will for the most part allow them to speak for themselves, and refrain from reconstructing their positions, instead focusing on response. 1 A Brief Methodological Note My own

Series:

Bo Mou

such a balanced insight is his Yin-Yang methodological vision that highlights the complementarity between two seemingly opposing but interdependent and interpenetrating forces. 15 In the first assertive claim of the opening sentence, “ Dao-ke-dao ,” Lao Zi presents a positive point of view which

Series:

Kyle Takaki

shares some of these methodological sentiments in the search for tidy packages that account for nebulous notions like truth, reference, speech acts, and metaphor (among other things). Unsympathetic charges regarding the artificiality of the tools of analysis miss the clarity they can render to the

Series:

Bo Mou

philosophy of language comparatively is possible, I suggest and explain a set of “adequacy” conditions for the sake of exploring how it is possible to maintain adequate methodological guiding principles in doing philosophy of language comparatively. Third, in Section 3, I explain the organizational strategy

Series:

Volume-editor Bo Mou

the truth maker as the extra-linguistic way things are. At this point, let me give more explanation (at the meta-philosophical and meta-methodological level) of why people’s pre-theoretic “way-of-things-are-capturing” understanding of truth, or, in quasi-theoretic terms in philosophy of language, the

Series:

Bo Mou

are very strong theoretical or practical reasons in favor of revision; the non-revisionist attitude is supported by the following general methodological principle: if there are two conflicting alternative theoretical approaches to an issue, and if one of them is more intelligible from a point of view

Series:

Volume-editor Bo Mou

是 appears to be disquotational, which would imply that they are not truth terms at all, and thus that translating them as such is misleading. 7 But I can’t resist remarking here that this methodological evasion maneuver reminds me a bit too much of the “flowery falsehoods” (華虛) that “astound the

Series:

Bo Mou

engaging way and his Principle of Charity concerning cross-traditional understanding and engagement. Both subjects, analytic methodological approach and cross-tradition understanding and engagement, are what the volume TRTW is about in view of Chinese philosophical tradition. Let me thus call Davidson

Series:

Una Stojnic and Ernie Lepore

) encoded information, but as we have seen, it is still less then satisfactory. For these reasons we are pessimistic about the prospects of using say that reports as guides to semantic content. We thus propose to drop this line of inquiry altogether and turn to a different kind of methodology. We believe

Series:

Alexus McLeod

in Wen-Kong was primarily methodological rather than critical. 32 LH 28.123.1. 33 Special thanks are due to a reviewer of this article who correctly points out that the evidence I have offered here is not by itself conclusive to show that Wang held a pluralist theory of truth, especially one using