Search Results
David Rylaarsdam, John Chrysostom on Divine Pedagogy. The Coherence of his Theology and Preaching . Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York 2014, xxvi + 317 pp. ISBN 9780198715382. £65; US $105. John Chrysostom has often been received as a popularizer rather than a theologian who
, “The Devil Did Not Make You Do It: Chrysostom’s Refutation of Modern Deliverance Theology,” in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives, ed. Chris de Wet and Wendy Mayer (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 626. 98 Barna Group, Gen Z, 41. 99 Lukianoff and Haidt, Coddling of the American Mind
.” In Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives , edited by Chris de Wet and Wendy Mayer , 613 – 37 . Leiden : Brill , 2019 . Polack , Ellie. “ New Cigna Study Reveals Loneliness at Epidemic Levels in America .” Cigna Newsroom , May 1 , 2018 . https
-63. 164 VanVeller, “Paul’s Therapy of the Soul” 133-60; and ead., “John Chrysostom and the Troubling Jewishness of Paul,” in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives , ed. Chris L. de Wet and Wendy Mayer, Critical Approaches to Early Christianity (Leiden: Brill, 2019), 32-57. The
Chrysostom,” JECS 24.4, 2016, 491–521. Wet, C.L. de, & W.E. Mayer, eds., Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives, CAEC 1, Leiden, 2019. Wilken, R.L., John Chrysostom and the Jews: Rhetoric and Reality in the Late 4th Century, TCHS 4, Berkeley, 1983. Wilson Van Veller, C., “Paul
Debates about Non-literal Interpretations At several points, John Chrysostom adopted interpretations which Diodore explicitly deemed ‘allegorical’, and conversely, Chrysostom rejected interpretations as ‘too philosophical’ that were Diodore’s opinions. This calls for a revision of our understanding
: Duckworth, 2004), doi.org/10.5040/9781472540775; Chris L. de Wet, “The Preacher’s Diet: Gluttony, Regimen, and Psycho-Somatic Health in the Thought of John Chrysostom,” in Revisioning John Chrysostom: New Approaches, New Perspectives , ed. Chris L. de Wet and Wendy Mayer, Critical Approaches to Early
exegetical tradition. It is unsound to use Chrysostom’s witness of this tradition as the ground for dating a text or its revision. 51 John Chrysostom, De mut. nom. hom . 2.3 ( pg 51.129); discussed further in Chapter 4. 52 Ibid., Ad pop . Ant . 7.4 ( pg 49.96); Mayer, Provenance , 511