Search Results
short, the 2004 identification and join of the two fragments as overlapping with CD IV 16–20 is correct, but the assignment of these fragments to 4Q269 is a case of mistaken identity. 2 The Script of the Two Damascus Document Fragments The script of the two fragments cannot be
Qumran, and some eighty years after the publication of the Cairo Genizah manuscripts of the Damascus Document). Needless to say, nascent Christian writings (of Jewish provenance to begin with) find no place between “biblical and rabbinic foundations.” Notwithstanding the negative implications of these
interpretation. 1 The Damascus Document The Damascus Document (D) has long been recognized as one of the most important non-biblical texts from Qumran. 1 Two literary sections of D are often referenced: the Admonition and a corpus of laws (cols. 9–16). 2 The Admonition begins with a series of sermon
others), 2 but there have been no attempts, to the best of my knowledge, to reconstruct the medieval codex on the basis of the Qumran scrolls. The reconstructions of the Damascus Document provided by Stegemann and by Milik and Baumgarten in the editio princeps are each based on the principle of a
1 Introduction: Scriptural References and Pesher Exegesis in the Admonitions The ten manuscripts of the Damascus Document found at Qumran (4Q266–273, 5Q12, 6Q15) complement the two copies found in the Cairo Genizah at the end of the 19th century ( CD A, B). The 4QD manuscripts contain a
Paperback edition is available from the Society of Biblical Literature (www.sbl-site.org)
Paperback edition is available from the Society of Biblical Literature (www.sbl-site.org)
This volume provides a detailed analysis of the Laws of the Damascus Document which fully incorporates the new cave 4 evidence. The author offers a close reading of the text and identifies a number of literary strata as well as a considerable amount of redactional activity.
This volume provides a detailed analysis of the Laws of the Damascus Document which fully incorporates the new cave 4 evidence. The author offers a close reading of the text and identifies a number of literary strata as well as a considerable amount of redactional activity.
Since its discovery, CD has sparked lively debate about its sectarian origins and halacha, issues with far-reaching implications not only for the development of Jewish law but also for the very nature of Second Temple period Judaism and its continuity into the early medieval period.
The contributors examine the physical reconstruction of CD, its relationship to other legal works in the Qumran corpus and to rabbinic law. Essays on specific legal topics, as well as historical perspectives, round out the volume.
Since its discovery, CD has sparked lively debate about its sectarian origins and halacha, issues with far-reaching implications not only for the development of Jewish law but also for the very nature of Second Temple period Judaism and its continuity into the early medieval period.
The contributors examine the physical reconstruction of CD, its relationship to other legal works in the Qumran corpus and to rabbinic law. Essays on specific legal topics, as well as historical perspectives, round out the volume.
An introduction to contemporary literary criticism is followed by a series of thematic readings, focusing on historical narrative, priestly imagery, and gender in the covenant community. Each theme is examined in terms of its potential for multiple (sometimes contradictory) interpretations and for its place in the larger sectarian discourse.
This study offers an alternative approach to the historiography of ancient Jewish sectarianism, acknowledging the presence of competing claims to shared traditions and the potential for changes in textual interpretation over time or among diverse communities.
An introduction to contemporary literary criticism is followed by a series of thematic readings, focusing on historical narrative, priestly imagery, and gender in the covenant community. Each theme is examined in terms of its potential for multiple (sometimes contradictory) interpretations and for its place in the larger sectarian discourse.
This study offers an alternative approach to the historiography of ancient Jewish sectarianism, acknowledging the presence of competing claims to shared traditions and the potential for changes in textual interpretation over time or among diverse communities.