© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009 DOI: 10.1163/161372709X457684 JEEPL 6 . 1 ( 2009 ) 13 – 35 The environmental complaint in EU law Prof. Dr. Ludwig Krämer Abstract The European Commission which has a large discretion to decide which infringements of EC environmental law it will pursue, has
to eu law. Thereafter, I elaborate on the meaning of “substantive and procedural legality” of the judicial review. Then I discuss how to define “public concerned” and the distinction between general and personal interests in relation to individual’s standing. The next issue concerns the role of the
Spanish coal-fired power plants or other industries – steel, cement plants – might have in substituting indigenous Spanish coal by imported coal; such difficulties appear to be of more theoretical nature. 5 Under eu law, State aid is, in principle, prohibited, 6 though Article 107 itself
Nord Stream 2 project (and that such an agreement is highly unlikely to be concluded in the present-day political climate), again, the questions I attempt to answer in this contribution are: which existing legal regime is applicable to Nord Stream 2? Is it EU law or international law and, if the latter
) has grown in the states of the cee . Such significance is obvious for eu member states: in 2007, former German President Roman Herzog wrote that 80% of national legislation finds its roots in eu law, 1 illustrating that understanding law- and policy-making in the eu member states also requires
with judicial decisions on EU law and, more specifically, air quality, which have become final. The Land of Bavaria refused to introduce a ban on diesel vehicles, preferring to pay unsubstantial financial penalties instead of adopting those measures that were prescribed by a judge to protect air