Search Results
-Orientalist textual analysis. The analysis here illustrates the significance of gender in the Orientalist constructions of both the claimant and the state. It argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) not only fails to properly address rights claims by visibly-Muslim women, but also contributes to
does not specify at what age a child may enjoy their rights. Nor are there any written differences in how the echr perceives young children and children nearing adulthood. Seemingly, the rights given by the echr are primarily to protect adults. Nevertheless, the European Court of Human Rights
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 DOI: 10.1163/157181610X491178 European Journal of Migration and Law 12 (2010) 23–43 brill.nl/emil Th e Concept of Integration in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Clíodhna Murphy Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Integration has
to concentrate on the political approach. I will analyze the interaction between the Moscow Patriarchate and the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “ecthr”) following Russia’s accession to the Statute of the Council of Europe in 1996. 2 In concentrating on the political angle, however, I
1 Introduction With the recent case of Volodina v. Russia , 1 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has again added to its ever-expanding jurisprudence on the issue of domestic violence. Since its judgment in Kontrova v. Slovakia in 2007, 2 the Court has made it clear that domestic