List price
EUR €278.00USD $334.00
Search Results
-Orientalist textual analysis. The analysis here illustrates the significance of gender in the Orientalist constructions of both the claimant and the state. It argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) not only fails to properly address rights claims by visibly-Muslim women, but also contributes to
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2010 DOI: 10.1163/157181610X491178 European Journal of Migration and Law 12 (2010) 23–43 brill.nl/emil Th e Concept of Integration in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights Clíodhna Murphy Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Abstract Integration has
to concentrate on the political approach. I will analyze the interaction between the Moscow Patriarchate and the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “ecthr”) following Russia’s accession to the Statute of the Council of Europe in 1996. 2 In concentrating on the political angle, however, I
1 Women and Religion in Strasbourg: Time for a Fresh Look Among the innumerable human rights issues that have been addressed by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or the Court) in its accumulated case law of several hundreds of thousands of rulings, 1 some of the most controversial
The 25 Years since Kokkinakis
As the tensions involving religion and society increase, the European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief is the first systematic analysis of the first twenty-five years of the European Court's religion jurisprudence. The Court is one of the most significant institutions confronting the interactions among states, religious groups, minorities, and dissenters. In the 25 years since its first religion case, Kokkinakis v. Greece, the Court has inserted itself squarely into the international human rights debate regarding the freedom of religion or belief. The authors demonstrate the positive contributions and the significant flaws of the Court's jurisprudence involving religion, society, and secularism.
The 25 Years since Kokkinakis
As the tensions involving religion and society increase, the European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief is the first systematic analysis of the first twenty-five years of the European Court's religion jurisprudence. The Court is one of the most significant institutions confronting the interactions among states, religious groups, minorities, and dissenters. In the 25 years since its first religion case, Kokkinakis v. Greece, the Court has inserted itself squarely into the international human rights debate regarding the freedom of religion or belief. The authors demonstrate the positive contributions and the significant flaws of the Court's jurisprudence involving religion, society, and secularism.
1 Introduction With the recent case of Volodina v. Russia , 1 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has again added to its ever-expanding jurisprudence on the issue of domestic violence. Since its judgment in Kontrova v. Slovakia in 2007, 2 the Court has made it clear that domestic
type of problem identified (from their different perspectives) by Bielefeldt and Alves Pinto. Although this article focuses largely on the procedures and standards of the European Court of Human Rights (Court or European Court), it is believed that the analysis and proposals may be applied, mutatis
DOI: 10.1163/092598812X13274154887349© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2013 Review of Central and East European Law 38 (2013) 77-108 Note The ‘Iukos Affair’. The Russian Judiciary and the European Court of Human Rights Laurence A. Groen* Abstract This note analyzes the functioning of the Russian
1 Introduction As the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) rightly observed in its Mennesson and Labassee decisions in 2014, there is currently little consensus amongst European countries regarding the issue of surrogacy, and even less consensus regarding the legal treatment of
extremely significant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights which – between 1996 and 2005 – assessed claims of violation of the right to family life ex art. 8 of the Convention brought by transnational parents excluded from family reunification with their children under Dutch immigration law. In
Page:12