Jennifer J. Marlow and Lauren E. Sancken

* The authors are grateful to the people of Kivalina for their contributions to this article. The authors also thank the people of Kivalina for their generosity in hosting Jennifer Marlow in the village over the past five years and for teaching her about life in Kivalina and relocation. Both

Existing us Federal and State Regulatory Responses to Kivalina’s Climate Displacement in the Alaskan Arctic  290 Jennifer J. Marlow and Lauren E. Sancken Universal Human Rights? Breaking the Institutional Barriers Facing Climate-Vulnerable Small-Island Developing States  322 Alice Venn

Maxine Burkett, Jainey Bavishi and Erin Shew

’s article, ‘Reimagining Relocation in a Regulatory Void: The Inadequacy of Existing us Federal and State Regulatory Responses to Kivalina’s Climate Displacement in the Alaskan Arctic’, attempt to address the needs of the Alaska villages that are contemplating, seeking funding for, or are in the process of

Gayle A. Heron

) occurred in nine of the ten samples (table I) collected from two lagoons and an inlet along the Alaskan coast; several of the species also occurred in offshore samples (fig. 1). Kivalina Lagoon and Marryatt Inlet had openings to the sea when collections were made by towing a net from a skiff; Krusenstern

Elizaveta Barrett Ristroph

absorb them. 25 Some are also opposed to joining up with a nearby community, due to concerns about discrimination and difficulties in maintaining their current subsistence practices. 26 anv s including Newtok, Kivalina, and Shishmaref have actively planned to co-relocate with government

Samvel Varvaštian

1 Introduction Over the past decade climate change cases have attracted increasing attention from both the public and scholars. An example of this are the three climate cases that have reached the us Supreme Court, 2 as well as the cases of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil , involving an

Series:

Laura Westra

In this work Laura Westra draws our attention to the failure of international law to promote and protect the rights of society in the face of the ravages of neoliberal agendas in an era of globalization. This book outlines how international law is perhaps a misnomer, and at its core there is a great distance between laws as they are written and laws as they are implemented. Each chapter in this volume peels back the illusions of laws as instruments designed to protect the public welfare, and shows how the intersection of globalization and neoliberal democracy has stripped people of their dignity, has violated human rights, has resulted in ecological disaster, all for the singular goal of profit and in the name of so-called economic rationality. Westra demonstrates how documents like national constitutions, with its eloquent language on the rights of its citizens, are cast aside when it comes to defending those rights. Calling international law a failed enterprise, the heart of this book explores how we may yet reconstruct a true system of international rights enforced by real international laws, and contemplates the limitations and possibilities of international organizations to effectively address truly international problems. Through the lens of what might be called a political ecology Westra offers us a call for action to protect our environments and indeed our selves.

Elizabeth Dooley

would apply to them, such as environmental impact assessments. Chapter 7 focuses on adaptation to climate change, starting with coastal management and retreat, polar areas, and the applicability of the us Endangered Species Act as a result of climate-change-induced habitat threats. The Kivalina v

California Climate Change Lawsuits

Can the Courts Help with Sea-Level Rise, and Who Knew What When?

Robin Kundis Craig

: The ruling consolidates all three cases. 8 Id . (relying on American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410, 424 (2011), and Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 696 F.3d 849, 857–58 (9th Cir. 2012)). 9 Id . at 937–38. 10 Id . at 939. 11 County of San Mateo v. Chevron

Bernhard W. Wegener

from violations of the rights of Arctic Athabaskan peoples resulting from rapid Arctic warming and melting caused by emissions of black carbon by Canada, 23.4.2013. 22 Native Village of Kivalina and City of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil corporation and others , US District Court, Northern District of