© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2007 DOI: 10.1163/156852807X208026 Meta-Discourse: Plato’s Timaeus according to Calcidius Gretchen J. Reydams-Schils College of Arts and Letters, University of Notre Dame, 100 O’Shaughnessy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA reydams-schils.1@nd.edu Abstract Th is
authors argue that De spiritu defends purely Aristotelian viewpoints against persons like Plato and Empedocles, who held respiration to be the most important vital process. Most of the De spiritu is directed against the pneuma doctrine of Plato’s Timaeus . Th e ‘Aristogenes’ mentioned in De spiritu 2 is
(Τίμαιος; Tímaios). [German version] T. of Locri [2] Epizephyrii in southern Italy (Τίμαιος Λοκρός/Tímaios Lokrós), the main speaker in Plato's [1] Timaeus, was in Antiquity regarded as a Pythagorean [1.83-85]. The Suda s.v. T. (IV p. 553,26f. Adler) and the scholia to Pl. Tim. 20 A Greene report
1 Introduction The Timaeus contains a detailed treatment of aisthēsis , 1 and while there have been a number of recent articles on either sense-perception generally or individual senses in the dialogue, scholars have overlooked the complexity of Plato’s account of aisthēsis . 2 This is
Although the Timaeus is known first and foremost as Plato’s contribution to cosmology, its scope extends beyond natural philosophy in the narrow sense to cover a wide range of topics, including ethics and politics. Plato brings the Socratic revolution full circle, not only by reinvigorating the
At Timaeus 48b, the eponymous speaker famously restarts his account from the beginning, this time introducing what he had left out all along: the third kind or χώρα. 1 Timaeus must concede that his speech is out of order, again. This speech is meant to be the first offering of a series of