. In this context, publicinterest litigation has been seen as one way to promote compliance with environmental standards and environmental protection.
This article documents the implementation of a new legal framework opening up environmental publicinterest litigation ( piel ) to Non
This paper introduces the history and background of environmental publicinterest litigation and illustrates the status quo, problems, and challenges it faces in China. This paper conducts a case study and envisions the prospect for environmental publicinterest litigation. The practice of
A further, different statutory definition of an administrative matter exists in Serbian law – in the Law on Administrative Disputes (further: lad ). The lad defines an administrative matter as an individual non-contentious matter of publicinterest in which there is a need for
1. Non-Public Funding Foundations Are an Important Supplier in the Public-Interest Market
Since the Regulations on Foundation Management (hereafter, “the Regulations ”) were released in 2004, non-public funding foundations (NPFFs) have proliferated quickly. In the four years from 2006
2008 was an eventful year in China. Many activities influenced the practice of publicinterest law. This paper will summarize the changes in publicinterest law in 2008. Specifically, we will examine the period from November 1, 2007 to November 15, 2008.
-juridification in the existence of a publicinterest, transcending the private or individual perspective.
In other words, juridification and de-juridification (promoting or endorsing social changes) often reflect a shifting balance between public and private, intensifying regulation when public interests are at
power of host States to pursue the publicinterest and welfare, on the other. 11 Since different sectors of international law are applicable to the kind of disputes under consideration protecting interests that may appear in contrast with each other, the present article will focus on those elements of
of the “Public-Interest Property Rights” Concept Jin Jinping JIN Jinping ( 金锦萍 ), Ph.D. of Law; Instructor, Peking University Law School; Deputy Director, Nonproﬁ t Organization Law Research Center E-mail: email@example.com Abstract Th e concept of “public-interest property rights” ( 公益产权 ) has
95/46/ ec , i.e., explicit consent and the possibility of ‘processing in the publicinterest’. Despite the availability of this latter option, various bodies (such as ethics committees) in many Member States have been reticent to allow research using personal data without consent, even where the