1 Introduction How many vowels did Proto-Indo-European ( PIE ) have? This is a question that became pertinent after the discovery of the laryngeals. It became clear that for the vast majority of cases in which Indo-Europeanists used to reconstruct * a and * ā , these vowels stood next to * h 2
The Precursors of Proto-Indo-European
The Indo-Anatolian and Indo-Uralic Hypotheses
Series:
Edited by Alwin Kloekhorst and Tijmen Pronk
Contributors are Stefan H. Bauhaus, Rasmus G. Bjørn, Dag Haug, Petri Kallio, Simona Klemenčič, Alwin Kloekhorst, Frederik Kortlandt, Guus Kroonen, Martin J. Kümmel, Milan Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg, Alexander Lubotsky, Rosemarie Lühr, Michaël Peyrot, Tijmen Pronk, Andrei Sideltsev, Michiel de Vaan, Mikhail Zhivlov.
Series:
Guus Kroonen
Elsewhere, I have pointed out the possibility that the Proto-Indo-European mediae , when envisioned as glottalized stops, can have developed from preglottalized nasals, i.e. * ɗ < * ˀn , * ɠ < * ˀŋ . This development is implied by the lexical distribution of the participal no -suffix, which
Laura Grestenberger
1. Introduction: The Proto-Indo-European Middle The reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European middle is notoriously fraught with difficulties, both in terms of its morphology and its function(s) in the protolanguage. Concerning the formal side, Jasanoff’s 2003 reconstruction of an
Carlotta Viti
such as the nominativus pendens or impersonal verbs, for example, it has been suggested that Proto-Indo-European ( PIE ) was originally a consistent topic-prominent language (Lehmann 1976) or a consistent active-stative language (Bauer 2000). Even in recent times, as we will see below, regularity has
Series:
Nicholas Zair
Jóhanna Barðdal and Thomas Smitherman
complex than words. On this basis, we suggest three different reconstructions. First, a reconstruction of a predicate-specific oblique subject construction with the verb ‘be,’ a dative subject and a resultative participial of a verb meaning ‘know’ for Proto-Indo-European, derived from the Proto-Indo-European
Ryan Sandell
’). Although this lexeme can be analyzed without problem in terms of inherited Indo-European lexical components—a root */dek̑-/ ‘perceive, be aware of’ (cf. LIV 2 :110–111) and ablauting perfect active participle suffix */-u̯ós-/~/-ús-/—whether the stem dāśvā́ṃs - proper is older than Proto-Indic (at the
Series:
Michiel de Vaan
1. The Proto-Indo-European root noun * sem- , * sm- (Beekes & de Vaan 2011: 210) is reflected in the cardinal ‘one’ in a number of ancient Indo-European languages: Greek εἷς, accusative ἕνα < * sem- , Armenian mi < * miyo- << f. * smiʕ- (Martirosyan 2010: 468), Tocharian A sas , Tocharian B