Bibliography

AndersonGarwood P. Paul’s New Perspective: Charting a Soteriological Journey. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity2016.

Arzt-GrabnerPeter. “Paul’s Letter Thanksgiving.” In Paul and the Ancient Letter Form edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams129158. PAST 6. LeidenBrill: 2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

AustinJohn L. How to Do Things with Words: The Williams James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon1962.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BaermanMatthewet al. eds. Deponency and Morphological Mismatches. Proceedings of the British Academy 145. Oxford: Oxford University Press2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BanksDavidSimon Eason and Janet Ormrod eds. La Linguistique Systémique Fonctionnelle et la Langue Francaise. Paris: L’Harmattan2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BarclayJohn M.G. Obeying the Truth: Paul’s Ethics in Galatians. Reprint Vancouver: Regent College Publishing2005.

BarclayJohn M.G. Paul and the Gift. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2015.

BarrJames. The Semantics of Biblical Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press1961.

BauckhamRichard. “Apocalypses.” In Justification and Variegated Nomism: A Fresh Appraisal of Paul and Second Temple Judaism edited by D.A. CarsonPeter T. O’Brien and Mark A. Seifrid135187. Vol. 1: The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism. WUNT 2/140. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; Grand Rapids: Baker 2001 2004.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BauerBruno. Kritik der paulinischen Briefe: Dritte und letzte Abtheilung. III. Hempel1852.

BeekmanJohn and John Callow. Translating the Word of God: with Scripture and Topical Indexes. Grand Rapids: Zondervan1974.

BerryMargaret. An Introduction to Systemic LinguisticsVolume 1: Structures and Systems. 2 vols. London: Batsford1975.

BetzHans Dieter. Galatians: A Commentary on Paul’s Letter to the Churches in Galatia. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress1979.

BiberDouglas. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1995.

BiberDouglas and Susan Conrad. Register Genre and Style. CTL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009.

BirdMichael F. The Saving Righteousness of God: Studies on Paul Justification and the New Perspective. Paternoster Biblical Monographs. Waynesboro, GA: Paternoster2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BirdMichael F.When the Dust Finally Settles: Coming to a Post-New-Perspective Perspective.” CTR (2005) 5769.

BlassF.A. Debrunner and Robert W. Funk. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 9th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press1961.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BlountBrian K. Cultural Interpretation: Reorienting New Testament Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress1995.

BockDarrell L. Acts. BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2007.

BreytenbachCilliers. “What Happened to the Galatian Churches? Paul’s Legacy in Southern Galatia.” AcT 19 (2014) 117.

BrinsmeadBernard Hungerford. Galatians—Dialogical Response to Opponents. SBLDS 65. Chico, CA: Scholars1982.

BrownGillian and George Yule. Discourse Analysis. CTL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1983.

BruceF.F. The Epistle to the Galatians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1982.

BruceF.F. Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1977.

BultmannRudolf. Primitive Christianity: In Its Contemporary Setting. Trans. R.H. Fuller. London: The Fontana Library1960. Originally Das Urchristentum: Im Rahmen der Antiken Religionen. Zürich: Artemis-Verlag 1949.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

BurtonErnest de Witt. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians. ICC. New York: Scribners1920.

ButlerChristopher S. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories. 2 vols. SLCS. Philadelphia: J. Benjamins2003.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ButlerChristopher S. Systemic Linguistics: Theory and Applications. London: Batsford1985.

CallowKathleen. Discourse Considerations in Translating the Word of God. Grand Rapids: Zondervan1974.

CampbellConstantine R. Advances in the Study of Greek: New Insights for Reading the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan2015.

CampbellConstantine R. Verbal Aspect the Indicative Mood and Narrative: Soundings in the Greek of the New Testament. SBG 13. New York: Peter Lang2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CampbellDouglas A. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2009.

CarsonD.A. ed. The Perfect Volume: Critical Discussion of the Semantics of the Greek Perfect under Aspect Theory. SBG. New York: Peter Langforthcoming.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CarsonD.A.Summaries and Conclusions.” In Justification and Variegated Nomism: A Fresh Appraisal of Paul and Second Temple Judaismvol. 1: The Complexities of Second Temple Judaism edited by D.A. CarsonPeter T. O’Brien and Mark A. Seifrid505548. WUNT 2/140. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; Grand Rapids: Baker 2001.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CarsonD.A.Peter T. O’Brien and Mark A. Seifrid eds. Justification and Variegated Nomism: A Fresh Appraisal of Paul and Second Temple Judaism. 2 vols. WUNT 2/140. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; Grand Rapids: Baker 2001 2004.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CatfordJ.C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press1965.

ChesterStephen. “Paul and the Galatian Believers.” In The Blackwell Companion to Paul edited by Stephen Westerholm6378. Blackwell Companions to Religion 53. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell2011.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ChesterStephen. Reading Paul with the Reformers: Reconciling Old and New Perspectives. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2017.

CirafesiWally V. “‘To Fall Short’ or ‘To Lack’? Reconsidering the Meaning and Translation of ‘ΥΣΤΕΡΕΩ in Romans 3:23.” ExpTim 123 (2012) 429434.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CloranCarmel. “Context, Material Situation and Text.” In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics edited by Mohsen Ghadessy177217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

CotterellPeter and Max Turner. Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity1989.

CoulthardMalcolm. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics and Language Study. 2nd ed. New York: Longman1985.

CruseD.A. Lexical Semantics. CTL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1986.

DanaH.E. and J.R. Mantey. A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament. Reprint Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall1957.

DasA. Andrew. Paul the Law and the Covenant. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson2001.

DaviesW.D. Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Fortress1980.

DawsonZachary K.Language as Negotiation: Toward a Systemic Functional Model for Ideological Criticism with Application to James 2:1–13.” In Modeling Biblical Language: Selected Papers from the McMaster Divinity College Linguistics Circle edited by Stanley E. PorterGregory P. Fewster and Christopher D. Land362390. LBS 13. Leiden: Brill2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

de BeaugrandeRobert. “‘Register’ in Discourse Studies: A Concept in Search of a Theory.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice edited by Mohsen Ghadessy725. New York: Pinter1993.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

de BeaugrandeRobert-Alain and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. Introduction to Text Linguistics. New York: Longman1981. German edition; Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag 1972.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

de BoerMartinus C. Galatians: A Commentary. NTL. Louisville: Westminster John Knox2011.

de RooJacqueline C.R. “Works of the Law” at Qumran and in Paul. NTM 13. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2007.

deSilvaDavid A. Galatians: A Handbook on the Greek Text. BHGNT. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press2014.

Dooley Robert A. “Functional Approaches to Grammar: Implications for SIL Training.” Unpublished manuscript 1989.

DotyW.G. Letters in Primitive Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress1973.

DoverK.J. Greek Word Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1960.

DresslerWolfgang U. ed. Current Trends in Textlinguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter1978.

DresslerWolfgang U.Introduction.” In Current Trends in Textlinguistics edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler14. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter1978.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DunnJames D.G.An Insider’s Perspective on Wright’s Version of the New Perspective on Paul.” In God and the Faithfulness of Paul: A Critical Examination of the Pauline Theology of N.T. Wright edited by Christoph HelligJ. Thomas Hewitt and Michael F. Bird347358. WUNT 2/413. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DunnJames D.G. The Epistle to the Galatians. BNTC. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson1993.

DunnJames D.G. Jesus Paul and the Law. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox1990.

DunnJames D.G.A New Perspective on the New Perspective on Paul.” EC 4 (2013) 157182.

DunnJames D.G. The New Perspective on Paul. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2008.

DunnJames D.G.Noch Einmal ‘Works of the Law’: The Dialogue Continues.” In The New Perspective on Paul413428. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DunnJames D.G. The Partings of the Ways between Christianity and Judaism. Philadelphia: Trinity International1991.

DunnJames D.G. The Theology of Paul the Apostle. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1998.

DunnJames D.G. The Theology of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians. NTT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1993.

DunnJames D.G.Whatever Happened to ‘Works of the Law’?” In The New Perspective on Paul381394. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DunnJames D.G.Works of the Law and the Curse of the Law (Gal. 3.10–14).” In The New Perspective on Paul121140. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DunnJames D.G.Yet Once More—‘The Works of the Law’: A Response.” In The New Perspective on Paul213226. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DvorakJames D.Martin Dibelius and Rudolf Bultmann.” In Pillars in the History of Biblical InterpretationVolume 1: Prevailing Methods before 1980 edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams257277. 2 vols. MBSS 2. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

DynelMarta ed. Advances in Discourse Approaches. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars2009.

EdenSum-hung Li. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese. London: Continuum2007.

EgginsSuzanne. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Continuum2004.

EgginsSuzanne and J.R. Martin. “Genres and Registers of Discourse.” In Discourse as Structure and Process edited by Teun A. van Dijk230256. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introductionvol. 1. London: Sage1997.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ElliottMark W.Scott J. HafemannN.T. Wright and John Frederick eds. Galatians and Christian Theology: Justification the Gospel and Ethics in Paul’s Letter. Grand Rapids: Baker2014.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ElmerIan J. Paul Jerusalem and the Judaizers: The Galatian Crisis in Its Broadest Historical Context. WUNT 2/258. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

FaircloughIsabela and Norman Fairclough. Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. New York: Routledge2012.

FaircloughNorman. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge2003.

FaircloughNorman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, MA: Polity1992.

FaircloughNorman. Language and Power. LSLS. New York: Longman1989.

FanningBuist M. Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek. OTM. Oxford: Clarendon1990.

FawcettRobin P. An Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An Extension and Simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. Philadelphia: J. Benjamins2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

FirthJ.R.Modes of Meaning.” In Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951190215. London: Oxford University Press1957.

FirthJ.R. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press1957.

FirthJ.R. Selected Papers of J.R. Firth 1952–59. Bloomington: Indiana University Press1968.

FlusserDavid. Judaism of the Second Temple Period: Qumran and Apocalypticism. Translated by Azzan Yadin. Vol. 1. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

FungRonald Y.K. The Epistle to the Galatians. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1988.

GathercoleSimon J. “Where is Boasting?” Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1–5. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2002.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

GaventaBeverly Roberts. “The Singularity of the Gospel Revisited.” In Galatians and Christian Theology: Justification the Gospel and Ethics in Paul’s Gospel edited by Mark W. ElliottScott J. HafemannN.T. Wright and John Frederick187199. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2014.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

GeeJames Paul. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge1999.

GeeraertsDirk. Theories of Lexical Semantics. OL. Oxford: Oxford University Press2010.

GeorgakopoulosAlexandra and Dionysis Goutsos. Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press1997.

GhadessyMohsen ed. Register Analysis: Theory and Practice. London, New York: Pinter1993.

Graber Philip L. “Context in Text: A Systemic Functional Analysis of the Parable of the Sower.” PhD diss. Emory University 2001.

GrimesJoseph E. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton1975.

GuthrieGeorge H. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. NovTSup 73. Leiden: Brill1994.

HallidayM.A.K. Explorations in the Functions of Language. New York: Elsevier1973.

HallidayM.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold1985.

HallidayM.A.K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold1978.

HallidayM.A.K. System and Function in Language: Selected Papers edited by Gunther Kress. London: Oxford University Press1976.

HallidayM.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. Cohesion in English. ELS 9. London: Longman1976.

HallidayM.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press1989.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HallidayM.A.K. and Jonathan J. Webster. Continuum Companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Continuum2009.

HallidayM.A.K. and Jonathan J. Webster eds. Halliday in the 21st Century. Vol. 11: The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London: Bloomsbury2013.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HallidayM.A.K. and Jonathan J. Webster eds. Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Vol. 2: The Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. London: Continuum2002.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HallidayM.A.K. and Jonathan J. Webster. Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning. ETSL. Sheffield: Equinox2014.

HansenG. Walter. Abraham in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Contexts. JSNTSup 29. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1989.

HardinJustin K. Galatians and the Imperial Cult: A Critical Analysis of the First-Century Social Context of Paul’s Letter. WUNT 2/237. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HarrisZellig S.Discourse Analysis.” Language 28 (1952) 130.

HellholmDavid. Das Visionenbuch des Hermas als Apokalypse: Formgeschichtliche und texttheoretische Studien zu einer literarischen Gattung. 2 vols. ConBNT 13. Lund: Gleerup1980.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HellholmDavid. “The Problem of Apocalyptic Genre and the Apocalypse of John.” Semeia 36 (1986) 1364.

HoeckAndreas. The Descent of the New Jerusalem: A Discourse Analysis of Rev 21:1–22:5. European University Studies 769. Series XXII: Theology. New York: Peter Lang2003.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HowardGeorge. Crisis in Galatia: A Study in Early Christian Theology. SNTSMS 35. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1990.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

HudsonR.A. Sociolinguistics. CTL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1980.

HurdJohn C.Reflections Concerning Paul’s ‘Opponents’ in Galatia.” In Paul and His Opponents edited by Stanley E. Porter129148. PAST 2. Leiden: Brill2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

KäsemannErnst. Perspective on Paul. Philadelphia: Fortress1971. Translated by Margaret Kohl. Paulinische Perspektiven. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

KeenerCraig S. Galatians. NCBC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2018.

KeyesClinton W.The Greek Letter of Introduction.” AJP 56 (1935) 2844.

KimChan-Hie. The Form and Structure of the Familiar Greek Letter of Recommendation. SBLDS 4. Missoula, MT: University of Montana Press1972.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Kim Mira. “A Discourse Based Study on Theme in Korean and Textual Meaning in Translation.” PhD diss. Macquarie University 2007.

KimSeyoon. Paul and the New Perspective: Second Thoughts on the Origin of Paul’s Gospel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2002.

KlauckHans-Josef. Ancient Letters and the New Testament: A Guide to Context and Exegesis. Translated by Daniel P. Bailey. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press2006.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

KlutzTodd. The Exorcism Stories in Luke-Acts: A Sociosylistic Reading. SNTSMS 120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2004.

KruseColin G. Paul the Law and Justification. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson1996.

KwongIvan Shing Chung. The Word Order in the Gospel of Luke: Its Foregrounded Messages. LNTS 298. New York: Bloomsbury2005.

LambDavid A. Text Context and the Johannine Community: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Johannine Writings. LNTS 477. London: Bloomsbury2014.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

LambS.M. Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press1966.

LandChristopher D. The Integrity of 2 Corinthians and Paul’s Aggravating Absence. NTM 36. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2015.

LavidJuliaJorge Arús and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A Contrastive Study with English. London: Continuum2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Leckie-TarryHelen. Language and Context: A Functional Linguistic Theory of Register. Edited by David Birch. London: Pinter1995.

Leckie-TarryHelen. “The Specification of a Text: Register, Genre and Language Teaching.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice edited by Mohsen Ghadessy2642. London, New York: Pinter1993.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

LeeJae Hyun. Paul’s Gospel in Romans: A Discourse Analysis of Rom 1:16–8:39. LBS 3. Leiden: Brill2010.

LeechGeoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. LLL. London: Routledge1983.

LevinsonStephen C. Pragmatics. CTL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1983.

LevinsohnStephen H. Discourse Features of New Testament Greek: A Coursebook on the Information Structure of New Testament Greek. 2nd ed. Dallas: SIL International2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

LiEden Sum-hung. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese. New York: Continuum2007.

LockeTerry. Critical Discourse Analysis. CRM. New York: Continuum2004.

LongacreRobert E. The Anatomy of Speech Notions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder1976.

LongacreRobert E. The Grammar of Discourse. TLL. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum1996.

LongeneckerBruce W. Eschatology and the Covenant: A Comparison of 4 Ezra and Romans 1–11. JSNTSup 57. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1991.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

LongeneckerBruce W. The Triumph of Abraham’s God: The Transformation of Identity in Galatians. Edinburgh: T&T Clark1998.

LongeneckerRichard N. Galatians. WBC. Nashville: Thomas Nelson1990.

LouwJ.P.Discourse Analysis and the Greek New Testament.” BT 24 (1973) 101118.

LouwJ.P. A Semantic Discourse Analysis of Romans. 2 vols. Pretoria: Department of Greek, University of Pretoria1987.

LyonsJohn. Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1981.

MalherbeAbraham J. Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis: Fortress2006.

MalinowskiBronislaw. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning by C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards296336. New York: Harcourt1923.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

MartinJ.R. English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins1992.

MartinJ.R. ed. Interviews with M.A.K. Halliday: Language Turned Back on Himself. London: Bloomsbury2013.

MartinJ.R. and David Rose. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. 2nd ed. London: Continuum2007.

Martín-AsensioGustavo. Transitivity-Based Foregrounding in the Acts of the Apostles: A Functional-Grammatical Approach to the Lukan Perspective. JSNTSup 202. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

MatthiessenChristian M.I.M.Register in the Round: Diversity in a Unified Theory of Register Analysis.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice edited by Mohsen Ghadessy221292. London: Pinter1993.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

MatthiessenChristian M.I.M.The ‘Architecture’ of Language According to Systemic Functional Theory: Developments since the 1970s.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective edited by Ruqaiya HasanChristian Matthiessen and Jonathan J. Webster2: 505562 2 vols. London: Equinox2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

MatthiessenChristian M.I.M.Kazuhiro Teruya and Marvin Lam. Key Terms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. New York: Continuum2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

McKayK.L. A New Syntax of the Verb in New Testament Greek: An Aspectual Approach. SBG 5. New York: Peter Lang1994.

MooDouglas J. Galatians. BECNT. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2013.

Morrison Daniel I. “Thus Says the King: Presentations of Parlance and Performance in the Apocalypse.” PhD diss. McMaster Divinity College 2018.

Murphy-O’ConnorJerome. Paul the Letter-Writer: His World His Options His Skills. GNS 41. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical1995.

NidaEugene A. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill1964.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

NidaEugene A.J.P. LouwA.H. Snyman and J.W. Cronje. Style and Discourse with Special Reference to the Text of the Greek New Testament. Roggebaai: Bible Society1983.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

NuytsJan. “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics edited by D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens543565. Oxford: Oxford University Press2007.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

O’BrienPeter T. Introductory Thanksgivings in the Letters of Paul. NovTSup 49. Leiden: E.J. Brill1977.

O’BrienPeter T.Was Paul a Covenantal Nomist?” In Justification and Variegated Nomism: A Fresh Appraisal of Paul and Second Temple Judaism. Vol 2: The Paradoxes of Paul edited by D.A. CarsonPeter T. O’Brien and Mark A. Seifrid249296. WUNT 2/140. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 2004.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

OropezaB.J. Jews Gentiles and the Opponents of Paul: The Pauline Letters. Apostasy in the NTC 2. Eugene, OR: Cascade2012.

PaltridgeBrian. Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. 2nd ed. CDS. New York: Continuum2012.

PardeeNancy. The Genre and Development of the Didache: A Text-linguistic Analysis. WUNT 2/339. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2012.

PenningtonJonathan T.Setting Aside ‘Deponency’: Rediscovering the Greek Middle Voice in New Testament Studies.” In The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament edited by Stanley E. Porter and Matthew Brook O’Donnell181203. NTM 11. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PikeKenneth L. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague: Moulton1967.

PittsAndrew W.Greek Word Order and Clause Structure: A Comparative Study of Some New Testament Corpora.” In The Language of the New Testament: Context History and Development edited by Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts311346. LBS 6. ECHC 3. Leiden: Brill2013.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. The Apostle Paul: His Life Thought and Letters. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2016.

PorterStanley E.Dialect and Register in the Greek of the New Testament: Theory.” In Rethinking Contexts Rereading Texts: Contributions from the Social Sciences to Biblical Interpretation edited by M. DanielCarroll R.190208. JSOTSup 299. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Diatribe.” In Dictionary of New Testament Background edited by Craig A. Evans and Stanley E. Porter296298. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Did Paul Baptize Himself? A Problem of the Greek Voice System.” In Dimensions of Baptism: Biblical and Theological Studies edited by Stanley E. Porter and Anthony R. Cross91109. JSNTSup 234. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic2002.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Discourse Analysis and New Testament Studies: An Introductory Survey.” In Discourse Analysis and Other Topics in Biblical Greek edited by Stanley E. Porter and D.A. Carson1435. JSNTSup 113. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1995.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.A Functional Letter Perspective: Towards a Grammar of Epistolary Form.” In Paul and the Ancient Letter Form edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams932. PAST 6. Leiden: Brill2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.The History of Biblical Interpretation: An Integrated Conspectus.” In Pillars in the History of Biblical InterpretationVolume 2: Prevailing Methods after 1980 edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams170. 2 vols. MBBS 2. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.θαυµάζω in Mark 6:6 and Luke 11:38: A Note on Monosemy.” BAGL 2 (2013) 7579.

PorterStanley E. Idioms of the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. SBG 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

PorterStanley E.Is Critical Discourse Analysis Critical? An Evaluation Using Philemon as a Test Case.” In Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results edited by Stanley E. Porter and Jeffrey T. Reed4770. JSNTSup 170. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. The Letter to the Romans: A Linguistic and Literary Commentary. NTM 37. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2015.

PorterStanley E. Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament: Studies in Tools Methods and Practice. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2015.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. ed. Paul and His Opponents. PAST 2. Leiden: Brill2005.

PorterStanley E.Pericope Markers and the Paragraph: Textual and Linguistic Implications.” In The Impact of Unit Delimitation in Exegesis edited by Raymond de HoopMarjo C.A. Korpel and Stanley E. Porter175195. Pericope 7. Leiden: Brill2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Prominence: A Theoretical Overview.” In The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament edited by Stanley E. Porter and Matthew Brook O’Donnell4574. NTM 11. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Register in the Greek of the New Testament: Application with Reference to Mark’s Gospel.” In Rethinking Contexts Rereading Texts: Contributions from the Social Sciences to Biblical Interpretation edited by M. Daniel Carroll R.209229. JSOTSup 299. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Systemic Functional Linguistics and the Greek Language: The Need for Further Modeling.” In Modeling Biblical Language: Selected Papers from the McMaster Divinity College Linguistics Circle edited by Stanley E. PorterGregory P. Fewster and Christopher D. Land747. LBS 13. Leiden: Brill2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament: With Reference to Tense and Mood. Studies in Biblical Greek. SBG 1. New York: Peter Lang1989.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.What Do We Mean by Speaking of Paul and Gnosis/Knowledge? A Semantic and Frequency Investigation.” In Paul and Gnosis edited by Stanley E. Porter and David I. Yoon922. PAST 9. Leiden: Brill2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E.Word Order and Clause Structure in New Testament Greek: An Unexplored Area of Greek Linguistics Using Philippians as a Test Case.” FN 12 (1993): 177206.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Sean A. Adams eds. Paul and the Ancient Letter Form. PAST 6. Leiden: Brill2010.

PorterStanley E. and D.A. Carson eds. Biblical Greek Language and Linguistics: Open Questions in Current Research. JSNTSup 80. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1993.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and D.A. Carson. Discourse Analysis and Other Topics in Biblical Greek. JSNTSup 113. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1995.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and N.J.C. Gotteri. “Ambiguity, Vagueness and the Working Systemic Linguist.” SWPLL 2 (1985): 105–118.

PorterStanley E. and Matthew Brook O’Donnell. Discourse Analysis and the Greek New Testament: Theory Application and Results. DCS. Leiden: Brillforthcoming.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Matthew Brook O’Donnell. “The Greek Verbal Network Viewed from a Probabilistic Standpoint: An Exercise in Hallidayan Linguistics.” FN 14 (2001): 341.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Matthew Brook O’Donnell eds. The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament. NTM 11. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Andrew W. Pitts. “New Testament Greek Language and Linguistics in Recent Research.” CBR 6 (2008): 214–2255.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Andrew W. Pitts. “Πίστις with a Preposition and Genitive Modifier: Lexical, Semantic, and Syntactic Considerations in the πίστις Χρίστου Discussion.” In The Faith of Jesus Christ: Exegetical Biblical and Theological Studies edited by Michael F. Bird and Preston M. Sprinkle3353. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Jeffrey T. Reed eds. Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results. JSNTSup 170. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Jeffrey T. Reed. “Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: An Introduction.” In Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results edited by Stanley E. Porter and Jeffrey T. Reed1528. JSNTSup 170. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

PorterStanley E. and Jeffrey T. Reed. “Philippians as Macro-Chiasm and Its Exegetical Significance.” NTS 44 (1998): 213231.

PotterJonathan and Margaret Wetherell. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage1987.

RäisänenHeikki. “Legalism and Salvation by the Law.” In Die Paulinische Literatur und Theologie edited by S. Pedersen6383. Aarhus: Aros1980.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

RapaRobert Keith. The Meaning of “Works of the Law” in Galatians and Romans. SBL 31. New York: Peter Lang2001.

ReeceSteve. Paul’s Large Letters: Paul’s Autographic Subscription in the Light of Ancient Epistolary Conventions. LNTS 561. New York: Bloomsbury2016.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ReedJeffrey T.Are Paul’s Thanksgivings ‘Epistolary’?JSNT 61 (1996): 8799.

ReedJeffrey T.The Cohesiveness of Discourse: Towards a Model of Linguistic Criteria for Analyzing New Testament Discourse.” In Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results edited by Stanley E. Porter and Jeffrey T. Reed2846. JSNTSup 170. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ReedJeffrey T. A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Method and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity. JSNTSup 136. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1997.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

ReedJeffrey T. and Ruth A. Reese. “Verbal Aspect, Discourse Prominence, and the Letter of Jude.” FN 9 (1996): 181200.

RobinsonJohn A.T. Redating the New Testament. Philadelphia: Westminster1976.

RuhlCharles. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. SUNY Series in Linguistics. Albany: State University of New York Press1989.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

RungeSteven E. Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament: A Practical Introduction for Teaching and Exegesis. Lexham Bible Reference Series. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SandersE.P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religions. Philadelphia: Fortress1977.

SandersE.P. Paul: The Apostle’s Life Letters and Thought. Minneapolis: Fortress2015.

SandersE.P. Paul the Law and the Jewish People. Minneapolis: Fortress1983.

SchaffPhilip. The Creeds of Christendom. 3 vols. 4th ed. Reprint Grand Rapids: Baker1977.

SchenkWolfgang. “Die Aufgaben der Exegese die Mittle der Linguistik.” TLZ 98 (1973): 881894.

SchenkWolfgang. Die Philipperbriefe des Paulus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer1984.

SchenkWolfgang. “The Testamental Disciple-Instruction of the Markan Jesus (Mark 13): Its Levels of Communication and its Rhetorical Structures.” In Discourse Analysis and the New Testament: Approaches and Results edited by Stanley E. Porter and Jeffrey T. Reed197222. JSNTSup 170. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SchiffrinDeborah. Approaches to Discourse. BTL. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell1994.

SchiffrinDeborahDeborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. BHL. Malden, MA: Blackwell2001.

SchiffrinDeborah. “Introduction.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis edited by Deborah SchiffrinDeborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton110. BHL. Malden, MA: Blackwell2001.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SchreinerThomas R. The Law and Its Fulfillment: A Pauline Theology of Law. Grand Rapids: Baker1993.

SegalAlan F. Paul the Convert: The Apostolate and Apostasy of Saul the Pharisee. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press1990.

SeifridMark A. Justification by Faith: The Origin and Development of a Central Pauline Theme. Leiden: Brill1992.

SilvaMoisés. “Faith Versus Works of Law in Galatians.” In Justification and Variegated Nomism: The Paradoxes of Paul edited by D.A. CarsonPeter T. O’Brien and Mark A. Seifrid217248. Vol. 2. WUNT 2/140. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2004.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SilvaMoisés. Interpreting Galatians: Explorations in Exegetical Method. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic2001.

SongChangwon. Reading Romans as a Diatribe. SBL 59. New York: Peter Lang2004.

SprinklePreston M. Law and Life: The Interpretation of Leviticus 18:5 in Early Judaism and in Paul. WUNT 2/241. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SprinklePreston M. Paul and Judaism Revisited: A Study of Divine and Human Agency in Salvation. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity2013.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

StendahlKrister. “The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West.” HTR 56 (1963): 199215. Translated and revised from “Paulus och Samvetet.” Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 25 (1960) 62–77.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

StendahlKrister. Paul Among Jews and Gentiles: And Other Essays. Philadelphia: Fortress1976.

StowersStanley K. The Diatribe and Paul’s Letter to the Romans. SBLDS 57. Chico, CA: Scholars Press1981.

StubbsMichael. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Language in Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press1983.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

SumneyJerry. ‘Servants of Satan’ ‘False Brothers’ and Other Opponents of Paul. JSNTSup 188. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic1999.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

TaylorMark Edward. A Text-Linguistic Investigation into the Discourse Structure of James. LNTS 311. New York: T&T Clark2006.

TerryRalph Bruce. A Discourse Analysis of First Corinthians. Arlington, TX: SIL1995.

TeruyaKazuhiro. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese. London: Continuum2007.

ThielmanFrank. Paul and the Law: A Contextual Approach. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity1994.

ThompsonGeoff. Introducing Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge2004.

ToffelmireColin M. A Discourse and Register Analysis of the Prophetic Book of Joel. SSN 66. Leiden: Brill2016.

TolmieD.F.A Discourse Analysis of John 17:1–26.” Neot 27 (1993): 403418.

ToolanMichael ed. Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. 4 vols. New York: Routledge2002.

ToolanMichael. “General Introduction” in Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics edited by Michael Toolan. Vol. 1. New York: Routledge2002.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

van DijkTeun A. ed. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 4 vols. London: Academic Press1985.

van DijkTeun A. Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Moulton1972.

van DijkTeun A. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. Longman Linguistic Library. New York: Longman1977.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

van DijkTeun A.Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis” in Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics edited by Michael Toolan104141. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge2002.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Van NesteRay. Cohesion and Structure in the Pastoral Epistles. JSNTSup 280. New York: T&T Clark2004.

Van OsBas. “The Jewish Recipients of Galatians.” In Paul: Jew Greek and Roman edited by Stanley E. Porter5164. PAST 5. Leiden: Brill2008.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

VanhoyeAlbert. Structure and Message of the Epistle to the Hebrews. SubBi 12. Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico1989.

VarnerWilliam. The Book of James—A New Perspective: A Linguistic Commentary Applying Discourse Analysis. The Woodlands, TX: Kress Biblical Resources2010. Republished as James: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Fontes 2017.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WallaceDaniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan1996.

WallaceStephen. “Figure and Ground: The Interrelationships of Linguistic Categories” in Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics (ed. Paul J. Hopper; Typological Studies in Language 1; Philadelphia: John Benjamins1982) 201223.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WatersGuy Prentiss. Justification and the New Perspectives on Paul: A Review and Response. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R2004.

WatsonFrancis. Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith. 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark2016.

WatsonFrancis. Paul Judaism and the Gentiles: A Sociological Approach. SNTSMS 56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1986.

WatsonFrancis. Paul Judaism and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2007.

WeimaJeffrey A.D.Gal. 6:11–18: A Hermeneutical Key to the Galatian Letter.” CTJ (1993): 90107.

WeimaJeffrey A.D. Neglected Endings: The Significance of the Pauline Letter Closings. JSNTSup 101. Sheffield: JSOT1994.

WeimaJeffrey A.D.Sincerely Paul: The Significance of the Pauline Letter Closings.” In Paul and the Ancient Letter Form edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams307435. PAST 6. Leiden: Brill2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WesterholmStephen. Israel’s Law and the Christian Faith: Paul and His Recent Interpreters. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1988.

WesterholmStephen. Justification Reconsidered: Rethinking a Pauline Theme. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2013.

WesterholmStephen. Perspectives Old and New on Paul: The “Lutheran” Paul and His Critics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans2004.

WestfallCynthia Long. A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning. JSNTSup 297. LNTS 11. New York: Bloomsbury2005.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WestfallCynthia Long. “A Method for the Analysis of Prominence in Hellenistic Greek.” In The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament edited by Stanley E. Porter and Matthew Brook O’Donnell7594. NTM 11. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix2009.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WestfallCynthia Long. “A Moral Dilemma: The Epistolary Body of 2 Timothy.” In Paul and the Ancient Letter Form edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams253268. PAST 6. Leiden: Brill2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WhangYoung Chul. “Paul’s Letter Paraenesis.” In Paul and the Ancient Letter Form edited by Stanley E. Porter and Sean A. Adams213252. PAST 6. Leiden: Brill2010.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WhiteJohn Lee. “Ancient Greek Letters.” In Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament: Selected Forms and Genres edited by David E. Aune85105. SBLSBS 21. Atlanta: Scholars1988.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WhiteJohn Lee. “Epistolary Formulas and Clichés in Greek Papyrus Letters.” SBL Seminar Papers 2 (1978): 289319.

WhiteJohn Lee. The Form and Function of the Body of the Greek Letter: A Study of the Letter-Body in the Non-Literary Papyri and in Paul the Apostle. SBLDS 2. Missoula, MT: SBL1972.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WiddowsonH.G.Discourse Analysis: A Critical View.” Language and Literature 4 (1995): 157172.

WoodLinda A. and Rolf O. Kroger. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage2000.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

WrightN.T. The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress1993.

WrightN.T. Justification: God’s Plan and Paul’s Vision. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity2009.

WrightN.T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. 2 vols. Minneapolis: Fortress2013.

WrightN.T.The Paul of History and the Apostle of Faith.” TynBul 29 (1978): 6188.

WrightN.T. What Saint Paul Really Said: Was Paul of Tarsus the Real Founder of Christianity? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans1997.

YingerKent L. Paul Judaism and Judgment according to Deeds. SNTSMS 105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999.

YoonDavid I.Ancient Letters of Recommendation and 2 Corinthians 3.1–3: A Literary Analysis.” JGRChJ 12 (2016): 4572.

YoonDavid I.The Antioch Incident and a Textual Variant: ἦλθον or ἦλθεν in Galatians 2:12.” ExpTim 125 (2014): 432439.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

YoonDavid I.Discourse Analysis and the Textual Metafunction: Analyzing the Texture of Galatians 4,12–20.” FN 47 (2014): 83109.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

YoonDavid I.Identifying the End of Paul’s Speech to Peter in Galatians 2: Register Analysis as a Heuristic Tool.” FN 48–49 (2015–2016): 5779.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

YoonDavid I.Prominence in New Testament Discourse: Galatians 1,11–2,10 as a Test Case.” FN 46 (2013): 326.

YoonDavid I. Review of Paul and the Gift, by John M.G. Barclay. JGRChJ 12 (2016): R13R17.