Vom eingeschränkten Nutzen strafrechtlicher Urteile für die Historiographie: Ein Beitrag zum Zustandekommen des ersten deutschen Urteils wegen Völkermordes in Ruanda

in Justice Without Borders
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text

Subject Highlights

 

Abstract

While it is an elementary precondition for a just verdict that it is based on a truthful set of facts, judicial proceedings are surprisingly limited in their capability to discover the truth. In spite of various hopes articulated in the transitional justice arena a criminal trial is not well equipped to establish a truthful historical record. After briefly outlining the reasons for this limited capability the following article portrays and analyses the judicial proceedings that lead to the first conviction by a German court for genocide in the context of the atrocities that occurred in Rwanda in 1994. Although the accused was finally convicted as a perpetrator the facts of the case do not support such a finding. A closer look at the procedural history of the case, however, demonstrates how special features of the procedure aided to come up with such a result.

Justice Without Borders

Essays in Honour of Wolfgang Schomburg

Table of Contents

Information

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 27 27 3
Full Text Views 31 31 23
PDF Downloads 7 7 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

Related Content