Pietrosanti suggests that graffiti is about “taking spaces otherwise forbidden” (2010, 72), while Ferrell (1995) states that young men and women employ graffiti as a means of resisting particular constellations of political and religious authorities. In this chapter, graffiti around the University of Addis Ababa campus is studied as a form of the writers’ self-expression. In research on graffiti, the graffiti artist is seen as negotiating a myriad of conflicted relationships between seen and unseen, space and place, local and global, and quiet and loud. Graffiti has also been interpreted as having the potential to communicate the common visions of politics that the young talk about with each other, and that unite people as members of a larger community, both local and global (Truman 2010, 10). What can the silent drawings on Ethiopian university walls and tables reveal to a researcher on youth and politics?
Ajayi argues that the capacity for independent thought and expression has not been encouraged in African countries and, consequently, students in African universities pay a heavy price for free expression (Ajayi cited in Balsvik 2007, 3). In this regard, Addis Ababa University is no different from the higher education institutions of other African countries. Established in the 1950s, it is one of the oldest and largest universities in Africa yet, with regards to freedom of expression, the previous and current regimes of Ethiopia can be regarded as repressive and, as Balsvik (2007, 2) observes, “Since the universities are key state institutions, conditions for free expression even within the university campuses are highly dependent on the actions and reactions of the regimes in power.”
The repressive environment in Ethiopia encourages students to opt for hidden forms of expression. Since the establishment of the university, students have not been encouraged to write on topics like politics and religion. For example, in one of the first rounds of Addis Ababa University student papers known as uc Calls, students were encouraged to “write on any topic under the sun, except on politics and religion” (Bahru 2014, 78); pseudonyms were
This chapter examines the various ways in which the youth at Addis Ababa University express their concerns through graffiti and, specifically, the lived dynamics of graffiti production in the context of legal and political power and social control. A major question that the paper explores is the type of authority the graffiti is attempting to resist, thereby invoking the larger cultural and political context in which the graffiti at the university proliferates. Peteet (1996, 155) writes that “[g]raffiti should be contextualized in sets of power relations and structures and the forms of resistance these entail”; therefore, in order to derive meaning from a particular work, it is necessary to examine the context in which the graffiti appears. Another focus of the chapter are the interactions through which writers surprise and challenge one another. In some of the graffiti, two or more writers appear to exchange words in the form of a dialogue, although, since the graffitists work in private, it is difficult to be certain whether they are one or multiple individuals. While dialogue would suggest different writers, particularly when opposing ideas are exchanged, it is possible that a single person has used the format to try to convince the reader that a conversation took place. Finally, while the chapter pays attention to the particular meanings of authority and resistance in the everyday experience of the university students, it is important to note that the graffiti artists do not present a unified voice, and not all graffiti is progressive.
The methodological framework for the examination of graffiti writing at Addis Ababa University incorporates observation and document research. The graffiti in the main campus, which has the largest number of students and hosts the major activities of the university, was collected from 2014 to 2016
Most of the graffiti at the university consists of words and statements written in the local language, Amharic, and English, sometimes with the addition of drawings to illustrate the writers’ points. For example, the female body would mostly be drawn next to a message about women in general and female sexuality in particular. All the graffiti used in this chapter written in Amharic has been translated into English.
The graffiti writers at Addis Ababa University express their opinions privately but in public and we may assume that these are opinions they would not dare to offer in person. Three strongly pronounced themes emerge: sexuality, religion and politics; in the Ethiopian cultural and political context all the three are considered highly sensitive. The most common theme, sexuality, mainly consisted of statements related to female sexuality. Religious and anti-religious statements were frequent. Derogatory statements about some ethnic groups were also observed.
Although approaching graffiti as the dominated’s resistance against the dominator indeed explains a wide realm of this societal conduct, it nevertheless regards graffiti only as pro or counter statement. Therefore quite often, significant side-meanings and social perceptions on various issues are omitted.
Graffiti is said to be subversive as it presents issues like sexuality which are considered taboo (Nielenberg 1994); therefore, it is not surprising that sexuality is so common in graffiti since it has been one of the most avoided subjects in public conversation (Reisner 1971), not least in Ethiopia where the subject of sex is publicly shrouded in silence (Rachel 2001, 3). Talking about sex in public is considered culturally taboo as Ethiopian tradition demands chewanet (decency). Rather, in Ethiopia, oral literature – the commonest mode of transmitting the deeply entrenched norms of society – is a significant means of expression of sexuality and related matters, and thoughts and attitudes are more freely expressed in this medium than in formal settings and languages. People express their feelings and emotions without much reservation through oral and written literature and, concomitantly, it has been suggested that graffiti’s sexual content could provide insight into the extent and nature of people’s suppressed sexual desires (Trahan 2011).
It is only when we look at the context in which the graffiti appears that we realize that the writers are resisting what is considered normal. In a country like Ethiopia where religion plays a major role in organizing people’s lives, stating that sex is the way to heaven is total subversion. Furthermore, it is believed that engaging with sexual matters places people outside the boundaries of morality, making them unstable. While the norm strictly endorses religious rules and rituals; the writers of the above graffiti openly declare the opposite.
No Sex – No Life
The way to heaven is sex.
This response endorses the original writer’s graffiti, but it is observable that some responses to graffiti with sexual content take the form of criticism, mainly stressing that indulgence in sexual matters is immoral. Those who criticize the original writers usually give religious reasons because, in many instances, religious morality and sexual morality are considered the same. The need to control sexual desire and not to fall into the trap of Siga (the flesh) is emphasized as it is considered that suppressing sexual feelings is a way to protect oneself from the evils of the world. As Foucault (1978) notes, in Christian doctrine more generally the pleasures of the flesh are regarded as evil and sinful and should be renounced.
Women who would like to have sex with me, please call me.
I would like to have a boyfriend and have sex with him.
Response: I am interested. Please write me with the following email address
The main reason for silencing childhood sexuality is to control.
Everyone knew, for example, that children had no sex, which was why they were forbidden to talk about it, why one closed one’s eyes and stopped one’s ears whenever they came to show evidence to the contrary, and why a general and studied silence was imposed (1978, 4).
This negative portrayal of women’s sexuality can also be seen in the way women’s sexual organs are depicted in society. In Ethiopia, not only graffiti but jokes and oral poems also depict the sexuality of women as unpleasant (Mulumebet 2006), a negative perception that must be seen in relation to women’s position in society. In Ethiopia, women’s sexual organs and women’s blood are considered unclean. In some parts of the country, women give birth unattended in an isolated hut built for the purpose because the place where women deliver their babies and everything in it is considered unclean (Meseret 2011). Hence, a man who entered the room would not be allowed to enter the church (Pankhurst 1990, 267). By the same token, parents interviewed about their children’s sexual relationships said that it is more important to control girls than boys. As some said, it is appropriate to tolerate male sexual transgression as they have stronger sexual needs than women (Mulumebet 2006).
Even if the vagina is ugly, we still continue having sex.
Women, you should know your vagina is not clean.
It should be noted that, although the majority of the graffiti depicts men positively, according to a study in a number of public universities in Ethiopia some graffiti in female students’ dormitories portrays men as unfaithful and untrustworthy (Teshome 2016).
Glory and Praise to King Penis!!
Let it live as the king of vagina forever!
Both of the above graffiti were written on a toilet wall. Some writers ask for advice and others merely want a response. Thus, viewers can read the graffiti dialogue as it occurs over time. Yet, from the way original statements are expressed, it seems that most of the writers do not expect a real response, putting telephone numbers and email addresses which do not seem to be valid.
I am in love with a girl.
Response a: Commit suicide.
Response b: Be a man and ask her.
Response c: Focus on your study.
If you want to discuss about love, please email me at
In the above graffiti, however, it is not possible to be absolutely certain about the gender of the writers. From their content they appear to be written by women, but one cannot rule out the possibility of men, or a men pretending to be women. As Reisner (1971, 4) writes:
I am suffering because I am in love with a man.
I am happy he started to love me back after two years.
Women graffiti writers at Addis Ababa University are resisting the norm that they should be silent about sexual issues. Although Ethiopian women face a number of challenges, evidence shows that they are not passive victims but try to resist oppression by various means. For example, Ethiopian women share with each other experiences about sexual relationships (see Mulumebet and Flemmen 2008) while, in a similar vein, Signe Arnfred (2004:23) argues that “the notion of ‘universal female subordination’ is misplaced in Africa”, giving the example of the phenomenon of women choosing not to marry. Furthermore, African women have always resisted the oppression of traditional rulers.
Despite the prevalence of the fruits of their efforts, writers of graffiti are seldom seen at their labors. So, if we ask what type of individuals writes graffiti, the answer lies in the nature of the message, the place where it is written, and the spirit of the times.
Another issue that is repeatedly addressed in the graffiti of Addis Ababa University is religion. Again, we need to look at the context in order to clearly understand the reason for this predominance. Students of the university come from all regions of Ethiopia, bringing their own cultures and religion and the important place religion has in their lives is clearly exhibited in the large quantity of graffiti on the subject. Most of the religious messages are short declaratory statements such as “Jesus is lord”, with the writers advocating their own religious ideology. Moreover, there are dialogues between the followers of different Christian sects, principally between Ethiopian Orthodox Church followers and Protestants.
Ethiopians are known for their deep religiosity (Molvaer 1980), historically being defenders of the faith rather than mere followers, as noted by Messay (1999, 111): “The wider the expansion of Islam and the consequent isolation of the Ethiopians, the deeper was their impression of being the last stronghold of Christianity, which stronghold had to withstand at all costs.” One of the crucial institutions that has guided Ethiopia’s history is the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, the oldest national church in Africa (Belay 1992). Although both Christianity and Islam are widely followed in Ethiopia, Orthodox Christianity is the oldest and most dominant religion in the country and its religious influence can be clearly observed in the day-to-day activities of the people. Christianity emerged in Ethiopia in the mid-fourth century, possibly earlier, and gained an important role in Ethiopian life that has lasted to the present; the Orthodox, so-called Tewahedo Church is deeply rooted in Ethiopian history, social life and ethics (Abbink 2003, 2).
As we can see from the above graffiti, the writers question the authority of religion, which is also observable in the joke one respondent makes about Jesus and his crucifixion. In the third example the writer changed the popular Bible verse, “I can do whatever I need to do in life through Christ”, to, “I can kill through Christ”. For an Ethiopian Christian, making jokes about the word of God is considered a serious offence. Furthermore, the church is still a powerful institution in society more broadly (Bourdieu 2001, 116). When twentieth-century Ethiopian rulers tried to build a modern country out of a multi-cultural and multi-religious society, they used the institution of the church, specifically Orthodox Christianity, to promote a modern national identity. For example, Emperor Haile-Selassie, who ruled Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974, sought to build a modern national state within a framework of “religious uniformity” under the Orthodox Church (Wudu 2003, 89). Hence, for the graffiti writer, criticizing
Jesus is lord!
Response a: Who said he is a thief?
Response b: One can’t make jokes about the words of God.
Jesus will come back to this world. You need to receive Him and be saved.
Response: He could come but he would be crucified and returned as usual!
I can kill through Christ.
In the first snippet, the Orthodox believer states that his/her religion is the real one, implying that other religions are wrong. The response is that the right religion is Protestantism and others worship idols, a critique which seems to be directed at Orthodox Christianity with its tradition of having the symbol of the Arc of the Covenant in churches. Then the first writer, or possibly another person with similar writing, responds stating that Protestants are newcomers, thereby claiming that his/her religion is the oldest. Abbink notes that the tension between religions is not new; Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity has “from its inception … contended with other faiths: not only with indigenous religions and cults but also with Islam since the 7th century and with Western forms of Christianity” (Abbink 2003, 2).
Orthodox – The real Faith.
Response a: All except Protestants worship idols.
Response b: You are a newcomer.
Here, the Protestant graffitist criticizes one of the major rituals in Orthodox Christianity, that of followers’ kissing the walls when entering the premises of the holy place – a religious practice that has always been considered as a wrong practice by followers of Protestant religions. In the graffiti, the writer advises those who kiss the walls of the Orthodox Church to avoid the practice and follow the right path which is Jesus Christ. Another major issue of contention is the special place Saint Mary has in Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity. Some writers emphasized the importance of focusing on Jesus rather than Saint Mary.
People, do not make a mistake by kissing a Church wall.
Salvation is only through Jesus Christ.
Some of the writings specifically focus on the religious elements that separate the Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity from other Christian religions. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church is known by its name “Tewahedo” (oneness), a name based on its Biblical Cannon. Unlike Christians who believe Christ to have two distinct natures, one divine and one human, followers of Orthodox Christianity in Ethiopia believe Christ has a divine nature in which his human nature is contained. Ethiopian Orthodox Christianity has its peculiar indigenized form, with significant Judaic influences (Belay 1992; Berhanu 2000; Pankhurst 1992; Ullendorff 1965). In terms of international graffiti comparison it is interesting and unusual that Ethiopian graffiti deals with theological specifics, but this is revealing of the societal divisions and power relations in the country.
Jesus is Lord!
Response: The Virgin Mary is His mother!
These two pieces of graffiti show the dissatisfaction of the writers with the policies of the current government of Ethiopia: in the first, the government is criticized for repressing the democratic rights of the people of Ethiopia; in the second, the writer accuses the government of playing a destructive role compared with the previous regimes of Ethiopia. Graffiti in these instances has both political and social significance (Pietrosanti 2010, 55).
Does Democracy exist in Ethiopia?
Response: Never, Ever, Forever!
In previous times it was about the prosperity of Ethiopia.
Now it is about the destruction of Ethiopia.
In most of the graffiti about ethnicity the denigration of, and prejudice against, certain groups by others can be clearly observed. The first piece shows how certain groups consider themselves better than others and the response
Who is better than a Gonderie?
Response: You are a monster because you are narrow minded and tribalist.
Ethiopia has been divided by Woyane into small regions.
Response: Let Ethiopia be divided into small towns, rather than regions. That is Ethiopia’s problem.
We strictly oppose ethnic politics since it has no use for our nation.
Graffiti writers do not only offer resistance to existing structures but also propose alternative and better arrangements (Ferrell 1995). Ethnic federalism has been criticized for privileging ethnicity over other markers of identity like religion, class and gender, particularly given that, depending on the context, other ways of self-identification are sometimes more important than ethnicity. It is feared that the significant internalization of ethnic identities enhances mutual stereotyping and prejudice in Ethiopia (Abbink 2011, 611–612) and, indeed, most ethnic graffiti on the campus was written in the form of hate messages. In response to these messages, however, some graffiti writers encourage unity and solidarity. In the past, Addis Ababa University students fought for political freedom. “They demanded freedom of expression and assembly not only to prepare themselves for a future role as responsible citizens, but also to raise the level of political consciousness in the Ethiopian population” (Balsvik, 2005, 311). Using graffiti as a medium, students of Addis Ababa University still express their belief in the possibilities of fruitful change in Ethiopia.
The chapter has explored the various ways in which graffiti writers in Addis Ababa University attempt to resist the control of the authorities, and has briefly examined the context of social control and political power in which the graffiti was produced. The major themes in graffiti at the university are associated with sexuality, religion, political power, ethnic differences and conflict. The graffitists have tried to reach a desired audience and communicate ideas that run counter to those of the establishment, but they have also tried to concretize or defend existing, perhaps threatened, dominant ideas, especially in terms of sexuality, religion and ethnicity. The university graffiti also incorporates interaction in which writers surprise and challenge one another. Ultimately, the writings remind us to pay attention to the particular meanings of resistance and authority in the everyday experience of youth.
The history of the Ethiopian state has been characterized as one of conflict, with varying dimensions based on class, ethnic, religious and regional sentiments. The graffiti writings analysed in this chapter are a clear indication
Though this chapter focused on the local issues presented in Addis Ababa University graffiti, it is important to examine how the writings relate to both the global graffiti subculture and the outside world. Ethiopian youth are not free from globalizing influences; hence, it is also important to look at their political engagement in the context of global social, economic and political transformations.
MulumebetZenebe, and Anne BrittFlemmen. 2008. “Gender Relations and Sexual Norms in the HIV/AIDS Discourse in Addis Ababa. Focus on Women’s Resistance.” In, Urban Poverty in Ethiopia: The Economic and Social Adaptations of Women in Addis Ababa, edited by EmebetMulugeta. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University Press.
TeshomeMengesha. 2016. “A Psychological and Intersectional Examination of Socio-Political Issues Reflected in Graffiti: Selected Public Universities in Focus.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Foreign Languages and Literature, College of Humanities, Language Studies, and Journalism and Communication, Addis Ababa University.
TrahanAdam. 2011. Identity and Ideology: the Dialogic Nature of Latrinalia. Internet Journal of Criminology.http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Trahan_Identity_and_Ideology_The%20Dialogic_Nature_of_Latrinalia_IJC_September_2011.pdf(accessed January 27, 2017).