The Use of Relativizers across Speaker Roles and Gender: Explorations in 19th-century Trials, Drama and Letters

in Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text

Subject Highlights


In Present-day English, the development of the relativizers has been towards a more frequent use of that. In 19th-century English, however, the wh-forms predominate. The present paper explores the distribution of that and the wh-forms (who, whom, whose and which) across speaker roles and gender in 19th-century Trials, Drama and Letters, and, in particular, describes the contexts in which that occurs. The data are drawn from CONCE, A Corpus of Nineteenth-Century English, consisting of 1 million words, covering genres representative of 19th-century English usage. The wh-forms are favoured by 19th-century letter writers, and speakers in Trials and Drama. A few female letter writers use that frequently, introducing a new, less formal, style in letter writing. In Trials, that is used most frequently by judges, lawyers and witnesses in typical environments: in cleft sentences; that is used with nonpersonal nouns and with pronouns such as something, everything and all. Playwrights may use that as a stylistic device to describe the speech of, primarily, waiters, maids, and other servants.

Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word

Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse


Table of Contents




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 15 15 2
Full Text Views 5 5 3
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

Related Content