Save

Between Theory(-ies) and Practice(-s): Legal Devices (Ḥiyal) in Classical Islamic Law

In: Arab Law Quarterly
View More View Less
  • 1 Saudi-Spanish Center for Islamic Economics and Finance, IE Business School, Madrid, Spain
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

By assuming a disconnection between jurists’ doctrines and the reality of social life, Joseph Schacht interpreted ḥiyal (legal devices) in classical Islamic law as ‘the maximum that custom could concede, and the minimum (that is to say, formal acknowledgment) that the theory had to demand’. Challenging this interpretation, this article argues that ḥiyal were not exclusively the product of commercial customs that were unrelated to the jurists’ ideal law. In actual fact, the diverging contractual theories of the Sunni maḏāhib contributed to the development of diverse ḥiyal practices, whose social acceptance in medieval trade was correspondingly fostered (or rejected) by underlying fiqh doctrines.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 386 81 0
Full Text Views 215 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 56 11 0