A Conventional and Sharīʿah Analysis of Bitcoin

In: Arab Law Quarterly
View More View Less
  • a Professor of Finance and Hibernia Professor of Economics and Finance, Bank One Professor in Business, Hancock Whitney Bank Professor of Economics, Department of Economics and Finance, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA
  • | b Doctoral Candidate, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, USA
  • | c Associate Professor, INCEIF, Kuala Lumpur, 59200, Malaysia
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The contention surrounding Bitcoin’s acceptability and usage has an unsettled premise in both conventional and Sharīʿah law, although digital and cryptocurrencies reflect a lasting reality. This research analyses this contention by examining the concept of currency and/or money and the underpinning trust reposed on its issuing authority against the notion that cryptocurrencies and fiat money differ only in form but share the same substance and purport. Qualitative methodology provides an analysis from conventional as well as Sharīʿah viewpoints to examine the extent cryptocurrencies can gain admittance in contemporary conventional and Islamic finance and economy. The methodology entails non-empirical secondary data sourced from libraries and online databases comprising journal articles, textbooks, newspapers and reports subjected to doctrinal content analysis. Research outcomes show division among stakeholders, including conventional and Sharīʿah scholars, regarding Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Further research is recommended inter alia on ways to adopt Shariah-compliant cryptocurrencies worldwide.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 573 490 55
Full Text Views 24 22 3
PDF Views & Downloads 54 50 8