Email this content
Save
Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Artificial burrows with basal chambers are preferred by pygmy bluetongue lizards, Tiliqua adelaidensis
In: Amphibia-ReptiliaNatural refuges are sometimes supplemented with artificial refuges to enhance populations of endangered species, or to improve the success of translocation and relocation programs. The design and structure of these artificial structures should incorporate key features of natural refuges. We aimed to improve the design of artificial burrows currently used in the conservation of the pygmy bluetongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis, by comparing burrows with or without a basal chamber. We found that lizards chose burrows with chambers significantly more often, but that neither the size of the chamber, nor the substrate lining the chamber influenced the choice. Incorporating a basal chamber into the design of artificial burrows should provide more favourable artificial refuges for these lizards and should be incorporated into future conservation management programs.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
Arida E.A., Bull C.M. (2008): Optimising the design of artificial refuges for the Australian skink, Egernia stokesii. Appl. Herpetol. 5: 161-172.
-
Brazill-Boast J., Pryke S.R., Griffith S.C. (2012): Provisioning habitat with custom-designed nest-boxes increases reproductive success in an endangered finch. Austral. Ecol. (in press).
-
Doré F., Grillet P., Thirion J.-M., Besnard A., Cheylan M. (2011a): Implementation of a long-term monitoring program of the ocellated lizard (Timon lepidus) population on Oleron Island. Amphibia-Reptilia 32: 159-166.
-
Doré F., Grillet P., Thirion J.-M., Besnard A., Cheylan M. (2011b): Premiers résultats d’un suivi à long terme sur une population de Lézard ocellé Timon lepidus sur l’île d’Oléron. Rev. Ecol. (Terre et Vie) 66: 205-214.
-
Ebrahimi M., Fenner A.L., Bull C.M. (2012): Lizard behaviour suggests a new design for artificial burrows. Wildlife Res. 39: 295-300.
-
Fenner A.L., Bull C.M. (2011): Central-place territorial defence in a burrow dwelling skink: aggressive responses to conspecific models in pygmy bluetongue lizards. J. Zool. 283: 45-51.
-
Fenner A.L., Bull C.M., Hutchinson M.N. (2008): Injuries to lizards: conservation implications for the endangered pygmy bluetongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis. Wildlife Res. 35: 158-161.
-
Fordham D.A., Watts M.J., Delean S., Brook B.W., Heard L.M.B., Bull C.M. (2012): Managed relocation as an adaptation strategy for mitigating climate change threats to the persistence of an endangered lizard. Glob. Change Biol. (in press), DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02742.x
-
Gibbons P., Lindenmayer D.B. (2002): Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia. CSIRO, Collingwood.
-
Goldingay R.L., Stevens J.R. (2009): Use of artificial tree hollows by Australian birds and bats. Wildlife Res. 36: 81-97.
-
Goldsbrough C.L., Shine R., Hochuli D.F. (2006): Factors affecting retreat-site selection by coppertail skinks (Ctenotus taeniolatus) from sandstone outcrops in eastern Australia. Austral. Ecol. 31: 326-336.
-
Grillet P., Cheylan M., Thirion J.M., Doré F., Bonnet X., Dauge C., Chollet S., Marchand M.A. (2010): Rabbit burrows or artificial refuges are a critical habitat component for the threatened lizard, Timon lepidus (Sauria, Lacertidae). Biodivers. Conserv. 19: 2039-2051.
-
Homan P. (2000): Excluding the common myna Acridotheres tristis from artificial nest boxes using a baffle. Vic. Nat. 117: 75.
-
Hutchinson M.N., Milne T., Croft T. (1994): Redescription and ecological notes on the pygmy bluetongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis (Squamata: Scincidae). Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 118: 217-226.
-
Lambrechts M.M., Adriaensen F., Ardia D.R. et al. (2010): The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol. 45: 1-26.
-
Lettink M., Cree A. (2007): Relative use of three types of artificial retreats by terrestrial lizards in grazed coastal shrubland, New Zealand. Appl. Herpetol. 4: 227-243.
-
Lindenmayer D.B., Welsh A., Donnelly C., Crane M., Michael D., Macgregor C., McBurney L., Montague-Drake R., Gibbons P. (2009): Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition. Biol. Conserv. 142: 33-42.
-
Mensforth C.L., Bull C.M. (2008): Selection of artificial refuge structure in the Australian gidgee skink. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 14: 63-68.
-
Milne T., Bull C.M. (2000): Burrow choice by individuals of different sizes in the endangered pygmy blue tongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis. Biol. Conserv. 95: 295-301.
-
Milne T., Bull C.M., Hutchinson M.N. (2003a): Use of burrows by the endangered pygmy blue-tongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis (Scincidae). Wildlife Res. 30: 523-528.
-
Milne T., Bull C.M., Hutchinson M.N. (2003b): Fitness of the endangered pygmy bluetongue lizard Tiliqua adelaidensis in artificial burrows. J. Herpetol. 37: 762-765.
-
Nelson N.J., Keall S.N., Brown D., Daugherty C.H. (2002): Establishing a new wild population of tuatara (Sphenodon guntheri). Conserv. Biol. 16: 887-894.
-
Pianka E.R., Vitt L.J. (2003): Lizards: Windows to the Evolution of Diversity. University of California Press, Berkeley.
-
Robertson R.J., Rendell W.B. (1990): A comparison of the breeding ecology of a secondary cavity nesting bird, the tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), in nest boxes and natural cavities. Can. J. Zool. 68: 1046-1052.
-
Souter N.J., Bull C.M., Hutchinson M.N. (2004): Adding burrows to enhance a population of the endangered pygmy blue tongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis. Biol. Conserv. 116: 403-408.
-
Souter N.J., Bull C.M., Lethbridge M.R., Hutchinson M.N. (2007): Habitat requirements of the endangered pygmy bluetongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis. Biol. Conserv. 135: 33-45.
-
Webb J.K., Shine R. (2000): Paving the way for habitat restoration: can artificial rocks restore degraded habitats of endangered reptiles? Biol. Conserv. 92: 93-99.
-
View in gallery
Figure 1. Mean (SE) time in minutes lizards spent in the standard artificial burrow (No chamber) and the tennis ball burrow (Chamber) on each of the two filming days of experiment 1.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 181 | 19 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 102 | 19 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 24 | 0 |
Artificial burrows with basal chambers are preferred by pygmy bluetongue lizards, Tiliqua adelaidensis
In: Amphibia-ReptiliaNatural refuges are sometimes supplemented with artificial refuges to enhance populations of endangered species, or to improve the success of translocation and relocation programs. The design and structure of these artificial structures should incorporate key features of natural refuges. We aimed to improve the design of artificial burrows currently used in the conservation of the pygmy bluetongue lizard, Tiliqua adelaidensis, by comparing burrows with or without a basal chamber. We found that lizards chose burrows with chambers significantly more often, but that neither the size of the chamber, nor the substrate lining the chamber influenced the choice. Incorporating a basal chamber into the design of artificial burrows should provide more favourable artificial refuges for these lizards and should be incorporated into future conservation management programs.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 181 | 19 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 102 | 19 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 50 | 24 | 0 |