We experimentally investigated whether intraspecific and intersexual attraction (or avoidance) by chemical signals may bias newt trapping success. We installed commercially available fish funnel traps which are often used in newt monitoring studies. We tested if capture rates differed between traps with or without newts. One experimental trap set comprised five traps, one trap being empty and four traps containing one male or female Lissotriton vulgaris or Ichthyosaura alpestris, respectively. Capture rates of newts of neither species nor sex was significantly affected by the presence of a particular newt species or sex in the traps, compared to control traps without newts. Trapping success thus seems not to be biased beyond random effects.
Bock D., Hennig V., Steinfartz S. (2009): The use of fish funnel traps for monitoring crested newts (Triturus cristatus) according to the Habitats Directive. Z. Feldherpetol. Suppl. 15: 317-326.
Fasola M. (1993): Resource partitioning by three species of newts during their aquatic phase. Ecography 16: 73-81.
Griffiths R.A. (1996): Newts and Salamanders of Europe. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
Grözinger F., Wertz A., Thein J., Feldhaar H., Rödel M.-O. (2012): Environmental factors fail to explain oviposition site use in the European common frog. J. Zool. London 288: 103-111.
Gunzburger M.S. (2007): Evaluation of seven aquatic sampling methods for amphibians and other aquatic fauna. Appl. Herpetol. 4: 47-63.
Heyer W.R., Donelly M.A., McDiamid R.W., Hayek L.A.C., Foster M.S. (1994): Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
Olson D.H., Leonard W.P., Bury R.B. (1997): Sampling Amphibians in Lentic Habitats. Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology, Northwest Fauna Number 4, Washington D.C.
Rimpp K. (2007): Teichmolch – Triturus vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Die Amphibien und Reptilien Baden-Württembergs, p. 237-252. Laufer H., Fritz K., Sowig P., Eds, Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Rimpp K., Fritz K. (2007): Bergmolch – Triturus alpestris (Laurenti, 1768). In: Die Amphibien und Reptilien Baden-Württembergs, p. 191-206. Laufer H., Fritz K., Sowig P., Eds, Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Rödel M.-O., Demtröder S., Fuchs C., Petrich D., Pfisterer F., Richter A., Stolpe C., Voß R., Ripperger S.P., Mayer F., Schmid F., Rieß J., Obermaier E., Dittrich C., Thein J. (2014): Modifizierte Kleinfischreusen zur verbesserten Fängigkeit adulter Molche. Z. Feldherpetol. 21: 75-82.
Rosca I., Gherghel I., Strugariu A., Zamfirescu S.R. (2013): Feeding ecology of two newt species (Triturus cristatus and Lissotriton vulgaris) during the reproduction season. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ec. 408: 05. DOI:10.1051/kmae/2013040.
Schlüpmann M. (2009): Wasserfallen als effektives Hilfsmittel zur Bestandsaufnahme von Amphibien – Bau, Handhabung, Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Fängigkeit. Z. Feldherpetol. Suppl. 15: 257-290.
Treer D., Van Bocxlaer I., Matthijs S., Du Four D., Janssenswillen S., Willaert B., Bossuyt F. (2013): Love is blind: indiscriminate female mating responses to male courtship pheromones in newts (Salamandridae). PLoS ONE 8 (2): e56538. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0056538.
Van Buskirk J. (2007): Body size, competitive interactions, and the local distribution of Triturus newts. J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 559-567.
Ichthyosaura alpestris female positioned in a plastic box within a funnel trap (left) and box closed with plastic gauze (right). The box roof was perforated (hole diameters approximately 3-4 mm) to allow newts to breathe; see text for description of the experiment.
We experimentally investigated whether intraspecific and intersexual attraction (or avoidance) by chemical signals may bias newt trapping success. We installed commercially available fish funnel traps which are often used in newt monitoring studies. We tested if capture rates differed between traps with or without newts. One experimental trap set comprised five traps, one trap being empty and four traps containing one male or female Lissotriton vulgaris or Ichthyosaura alpestris, respectively. Capture rates of newts of neither species nor sex was significantly affected by the presence of a particular newt species or sex in the traps, compared to control traps without newts. Trapping success thus seems not to be biased beyond random effects.