Animals employ a wide variety of communication tactics that rely on distinct sensory modalities. Lizards are characterized by their heightened dependence on chemical and visual communication. Some authors have proposed that a reduced number of chemical secretory pores may be associated with an increased visual dependence in some species. Here, we study two species of Liolaemus lizards with different chemical features to compare their visual and chemical communication. The first species, L. coeruleus, does not have precloacal pores in either sex, while L. albiceps has precloacal pores in both sexes. We expect that L. coeruleus will principally adhere to the visual modality, while L. albiceps will show greater chemical responses. We filmed the lizard’s response to different chemical and visual stimuli. In the trials, both species demonstrated chemical self-recognition, L. albiceps exhibited less total time in motion but more behavioural displays in the presence of conspecific scents, suggesting conspecific chemical recognition too. On the other hand, visuals results showed that L. coeruleus reacted more to the presence of conspecifics than L. albiceps. These observations suggest that L. coeruleus relies more on visual signalization, while L. albiceps has a greater dependence on chemical communication. Our results may indicate a correspondence between precloacal secretions and the response to these by conspecifics in both species studied.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abdala, C.S. (2007): Phylogeny of the boulengeri group (Iguania: Liolaemidae, Liolaemus) based on morphological and molecular characters. Zootaxa 1538: 13-84.
Abdala, C.S., Paz, M.M., Semhan, R.V. (2013): New Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) with a new morphological character from the border between Argentina and Chile. Rev. Biol. Trop. 61: 1563-1584.
Alberts, A.C. (1989): Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in desert iguanas: implications for pheromone detection. Anim. Behav. 38: 129-137.
Ali, M.F., Morgan, E.D. (1990): Chemical communication in insect communities: a guide to insect pheromones with special emphasis on social insects. Biol. Rev. 65: 227-247.
Baeckens, S., Edwards, S., Huyghe, K., Van Damme, R. (2015): Chemical signalling in lizards: an interspecific comparison of femoral pore numbers in Lacertidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 114: 44-57.
Baeckens, S., Van Damme, R., Cooper, W.E. (2017): How phylogeny and foraging ecology drive the level of chemosensory exploration in lizards and snakes. J. Evol. Biol. 30: 627-640.
Baeckens, S., Martín, J., García-Roa, R., Pafilis, P., Huyghe, K., Van Damme, R. (2018): How environmental conditions shape the chemical signal design of lizards. Funct. Ecol. 32: 566-580.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R.H.B., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Scheipl, F., Grothendieck, G., Peter, G., Fox, J. (2012): Package ‘lme4’. CRAN. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Bozzo Miranda, V. (2014): Interacciones sociales en el lagarto llorón (Liolaemus chilinesis). Bachelor Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Silvoagropecuarias Escuela Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Mayor, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Breitman, M.F., Parra, M., Pérez, C.H.F., Sites Jr., J. (2011): Two new species of lizards from the Liolaemus lineomaculatus section (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from southern Patagonia. Zootaxa 3120: 1-28.
Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2010): Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 292-300.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. (2004): Multimodel inference understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33: 261-304.
Campos, S.M., Strauss, C., Martins, E.P. (2017): In space and time: territorial animals are attracted to conspecific chemical cues. Ethology 123: 136-144.
Cei, J.M. (1986): Reptiles del Centro, Centro-oeste y Sur de la Argentina. Reg. Sci. Nat., Torino 4: 1-527.
Cei, J.M., Ortiz-Zapata, J. (1983): Descripción de una nueva especie de lagarto Liolaemus coeruleus n. sp. para Argentina (Sauria, Iguanidae). Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepc. 54: 35-41.
Chen, J., Jono, T., Cui, J., Yue, X., Tang, Y. (2016): The acoustic properties of low intensity vocalizations match hearing sensitivity in the webbed-toed gecko, Gekko subpalmatus. PLoS One 11: e0146677.
Cooper, W.E., van Wyk, J.H., Mouton, P.L.F. (1996): Pheromonal detection and sex discrimination of conspecific substrate deposits by the rock-dwelling cordylid lizard Cordylus cordylus. Copeia 1996: 839-845.
De Waal, F.B.M. (2003): Darwin’s legacy and the study of primate visual communication. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1000: 7-31.
Escobar, C.A., Labra, A., Niemeyer, H.M. (2001): Chemical composition of precloacal secretions of Liolaemus lizards. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 1677-1690.
Esquerré, D., Núñez, H., Scolaro, J.A. (2013): Liolaemus carlosgarini and Liolaemus riodamas (Squamata: Liolaemidae), two new species of lizards lacking precloacal pores, from Andean areas of central Chile. Zootaxa 3619: 428-452.
Font, E., Desfilis, E. (2002): Chemosensory recognition of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by juveniles of the Iberian wall lizard Podarcis hispanica. Ethology 108: 319-330.
Font, E., Carazo, P., Pérez i de Lanuza, G., Kramer, M. (2012): Predator-elicited foot shakes in wall lizards (Podarcis muralis): evidence for a pursuit-deterrent function. J. Comp. Psychol. 126: 87-96.
García-Roa, R., Jara, M., Baeckens, S., López, P., Van Damme, R., Martín, J., Pincheira-Donoso, D. (2017): Macroevolutionary diversification of glands for chemical communication in squamate reptiles. Sci. Rep. 7: 9288.
Gutiérrez, J.A., Piantoni, C., Ibargüengoytía, N. (2013): Altitudinal effects on life history parameters in populations of Liolaemus pictus argentinus (Sauria: Liolaemidae). Acta Herpetol. 8: 9-17.
Hagedorn, M., Heiligenberg, W. (1985): Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish. Anim. Behav. 33: 254-265.
Halloy, M. (1996): Behavioral patterns in Liolaemus quilmes (Tropiduridae), a South American lizard. Bull. Md. Herpetol. Soc. 32: 43-57.
Halloy, M. (2012): Visual display variations in neotropical lizards, Liolaemus quilmes (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to sex and season. Herpetol. J. 22: 267-270.
Halloy, M., Castillo, M. (2002): Forelimb wave displays in lizard species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Herpetol. Nat. Hist. 9: 127-133.
Hews, D.K., Benard, M.F. (2001): Negative association between conspicuous visual display and chemosensory behavior in two phrynosomatid lizards. Ethology 107: 839-850.
Hews, D.K., Date, P., Hara, E., Castellano, M.J. (2011): Field presentation of male secretions alters social display in Sceloporus virgatus but not S. undulatus lizards. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1403-1410.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., Westfall, P., Heiberger, R.M., Schuetzenmeister, A., Scheibe, S. (2019): Multcomp: simultaneous inference in general parametric models. R 2019, 1-3.
Johnstone, R.A. (1996): Multiple displays in animal communication:’backup signals’ and ‘multiple messages’. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351: 329-338.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B. (2015): Package ‘lmertest’. R package version, 2(0).
Labra, A. (2006): Chemoreception and the assessment of fighting abilities in the lizard Liolaemus monticola. Ethology 112: 993-999.
Labra, A. (2008): Multi-contextual use of chemosignals by Liolaemus lizards. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, p. 357-365. Hurst, J.L., Beynon, R.J., Roberts, S.C., Wyatt, T.D., Eds, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
Labra, A. (2011): Chemical stimuli and species recognition in Liolaemus lizards. J. Zool. 285: 215-221.
Labra, A., Hoare, M. (2015): Chemical recognition in a snake-lizard predator-prey system. Acta Ethol. 18: 173-179.
Labra, A., Brann, J.H., Fadool, D.A. (2005): Heterogeneity of voltage- and chemosignal-activated response profiles in vomeronasal sensory neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 94: 2535-2548.
Labra, A., Reyes-Olivares, C., Weymann, M. (2016): Asymmetric response to heterotypic distress calls in the lizard Liolaemus chiliensis. Ethology 122: 758-768.
Labra, A., Escobar, C.A., Aguilar, P.M., Niemeyer, H.M. (2002): Sources of pheromones in the lizard Liolaemus tenuis. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 75: 141-147.
Labra, A., Carazo, P., Desfilis, E., Font, E. (2007): Agonistic interactions in a Liolaemus lizard: structure of head bob displays. Herpetologica 63: 11-18.
Lesson, R.P., Duperrey, L.I. (1830): Voyage autour du monde: exécuté par Ordre du Roi, Sur la Corvette de Sa Majesté, La Coquille, pendant les années 1822, 1823, 1824 et 1825, sous le ministère et conformément aux instructions de SEM le marquis de Clermont-Tonnerre, ministre de la Marine, Bertrand.
Lobo, F., Laurent, R.F. (1995): Un nouveau Liolaemus Andin (Tropiduridae). Revue Fr. Aquariol. Herpetol. 22: 107-116.
López, P., Martín, J. (2001): Fighting rules and rival recognition reduce costs of aggression in male lizards, Podarcis hispanica. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 111-116.
Lopez, P.T., Narins, P.M., Lewis, E.R., Moore, S.W. (1988): Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris. Anim. Behav. 36: 1295-1308.
Manser, M.B., Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L. (2002): Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6: 55-57.
Martín, J., López, P. (2006): Age-related variation in lipophilic chemical compounds from femoral gland secretions of male lizards Psammodromus algirus. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 34: 691-697.
Martínez Oliver, I., Lobo, F. (2002): Una nueva especie de Liolaemus del grupo alticolor (Iguania: Liolaemidae) de la puna salteña, Argentina. Cuad. Herpetol. 16: 47-64.
Martins, E.P., Labra, A., Halloy, M., Thompson, J.T. (2004): Repeated large scale patterns of signal evolution: an interspecific study of Liolaemus lizard headbob displays. Anim. Behav. 68: 453-463.
Martins, E.P., Ossip-Drahos, A.G., Vital García, C., Zúñiga-Vega, J.J., Campos, S.M., Hews, D.K. (2018): Trade-offs between visual and chemical behavioral responses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72: 189.
Mason, R.T., Parker, M.R. (2010): Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles. J. Comp. Physiol. A 196: 729-749.
Millar, R.B., Anderson, M.J. (2004): Remedies for pseudoreplication. Fish Res. 70: 397-407.
Mora, M., Labra, A. (2017): The response of two Liolaemus lizard species to ash from fire and volcanism. J. Herpetol. 51: 388-395.
Ord, T.J., Blumstein, D.T. (2002): Size constraints and the evolution of display complexity: why do large lizards have simple displays?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 145-161.
Ord, T.J., Blumstein, D.T., Evans, C.S. (2001): Intrasexual selection predicts the evolution of signal complexity in lizards. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 737-744.
Ord, T.J., Blumstein, D.T., Evans, C.S. (2002): Ecology and signal evolution in lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 127-148.
Ord, T.J., Peters, R.A., Clucas, B., Stamps, J.A. (2007): Lizards speed up visual displays in noisy motion habitats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274: 1057-1062.
Ortega, Z., Mencía, A., Pérez-Mellado, V. (2017): Rapid acquisition of antipredatory responses to new predators by an insular lizard. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71: 1.
Partan, S.R., Marler, P. (2005): Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am. Nat. 166: 231-245.
Paruelo, J.M., Beltrán, A., Jobbágy, E., Sala, O.E., Golluscio, R.A. (1998): The climate of Patagonia: general patterns and controls on biotic processes. Ecol. Austral 8: 85-101.
Pérez i de Lanuza, G., Font, E., Monterde, J.L. (2013): Using visual modelling to study the evolution of lizard coloration: sexual selection drives the evolution of sexual dichromatism in lacertids. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 1826-1835.
Phelan, P.L., Baker, T.C. (1987): Evolution of male pheromones in moths: reproductive isolation through sexual selection? Science 235: 205-207.
R Development Core Team (2019): R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
Rosell, F., Sundsdal, L.J. (2001): Odorant source used in Eurasian beaver territory marking. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 2471-2491.
Ruiz-Monachesi, M.R. (2018): Comunicación química y visual en el género Liolaemus (Iguania-Liolaemidae), evaluación morfo-funcional. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT), San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina.
Ruiz-Monachesi, M.R., Valdecantos, S. (2017): Chemical recognition of prey in Liolaemus ceii (Donoso-Barros, 1971). Herpetol. Notes 10: 327-328.
Ruiz-Monachesi, M.R., Paz, A., Quipildor, A.M. (2019): Hemipenes eversion behavior: a new form of communication in two Liolaemus lizards (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Can. J. Zool. 97: 187-194.
Sánchez-Martinez, P.M., Ramiréz-Pinilla, M.P., Miranda-Esquivel, D.R. (2007): Comparative histology of the vaginal-cloacal region in Squamata and its phylogenetic implications. Acta Zool. 88: 289-307.
Scrocchi, G., Kretzschmar, S. (1996): Guía de métodos de captura y preparación de anfibios y reptiles para estudios científicos y manejo de colecciones herpetológicas. Fundación Miguel Lillo Tucumán.
Symonds, M.R., Moussalli, A. (2011): A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 13-21.
Trauth, S.E., Cooper, W.E., Vitt, L.J., Perril, S.A. (1987): Cloacal anatomy of the broad-headed skink, Eumeces laticeps, with a description of a female pheromonal gland. Herpetologica 43: 458-466.
Troncoso-Palacios, J., Labra, A. (2012): Is the exploratory behavior of Liolaemus nitidus modulated by sex? Acta Herpetol. 7: 69-80.
Uetz, P., Freed, P., Jirí, H. (2020): The reptile database. http://www.reptile-database.org. Accessed February 5, 2020.
Valdecantos, S. (2011): Coexistencia entre especies: competencia, agresión o indiferencia en lagartijas de la puna del género Liolaemus (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaeminae). Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Códoba, Argentina.
Valdecantos, S., Labra, A. (2017): Testing the functionality of precloacal secretions from both sexes in the South American lizard, Liolaemus chiliensis. Amphibia-Reptilia 38: 209-216.
Valdecantos, S., Lobo, F., Martínez, V. (2007): Estimación de edades, tamaño corporal y adquisición de la maduréz sexual en dos especies de Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Cuad. Herpetol. 21: 31-44.
Valdecantos, S., Martínez, V., Labra, A. (2014): Comparative morphology of Liolaemus lizards precloacal glands. Acta Herpetol. 9: 147-158.
Valdecantos, S., Martínez, V., Labra, A. (2015): Description of a proctodeal gland present in three South American Liolaemus lizards (Iguania: Liolaemidae). Salamandra 51: 182-186.
Vicente, N.S. (2018): Headbob displays signal sex, social context and species identity in a Liolaemus lizard. Amphibia-Reptilia 39: 203-218.
Vicente, N.S., Halloy, M. (2015): Male headbob display structure in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to social context. Herpetol. J. 25: 49-53.
Vicente, N.S., Halloy, M. (2016): Chemical recognition of conspecifics in a neotropical lizard, Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae): relation to visual displays, season and sex. J. Ethol. 34: 329-335.
Vicente, N.S., Halloy, M. (2018): El auto-reconocimiento químico en Liolaemus pacha (Iguania: Liolaemidae) está influenciado por la estación. Cuad. Herpetol. 32: 23-29.
Vicente, N.S. (2019): Arm-wave display in a Liolaemus lizard. Herpetol. J. 29: 184-188.
Vitt, L.J., Congdon, J.D., Hulse, A.C., Platz, J.E. (1974): Territorial aggressive encounters and tail breaks in the lizard Sceloporus magister. Copeia 1974: 990-993.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 640 | 264 | 39 |
| Full Text Views | 229 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 153 | 6 | 0 |
Animals employ a wide variety of communication tactics that rely on distinct sensory modalities. Lizards are characterized by their heightened dependence on chemical and visual communication. Some authors have proposed that a reduced number of chemical secretory pores may be associated with an increased visual dependence in some species. Here, we study two species of Liolaemus lizards with different chemical features to compare their visual and chemical communication. The first species, L. coeruleus, does not have precloacal pores in either sex, while L. albiceps has precloacal pores in both sexes. We expect that L. coeruleus will principally adhere to the visual modality, while L. albiceps will show greater chemical responses. We filmed the lizard’s response to different chemical and visual stimuli. In the trials, both species demonstrated chemical self-recognition, L. albiceps exhibited less total time in motion but more behavioural displays in the presence of conspecific scents, suggesting conspecific chemical recognition too. On the other hand, visuals results showed that L. coeruleus reacted more to the presence of conspecifics than L. albiceps. These observations suggest that L. coeruleus relies more on visual signalization, while L. albiceps has a greater dependence on chemical communication. Our results may indicate a correspondence between precloacal secretions and the response to these by conspecifics in both species studied.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 640 | 264 | 39 |
| Full Text Views | 229 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 153 | 6 | 0 |