‘Selfies’ Reveal Systematic Deviations from Known Principles of Photographic Composition

In: Art & Perception
View More View Less
  • 1 Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Parma, Italy
  • | 2 Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


We used ‘selfies’, self-portraits taken with a hand-held smartphone camera, to test three known principles of photographic composition: The rule of thirds, the golden ratio rule, and the eye centering principle. Although they are often taught and discussed, the origin of these principles remains unclear. It is possible that they stem from constraints on human perceptual processes. Alternatively, these principles might serve more practical purposes, such as forcing photographers to explore all quadrants of the image. Selfies provide an ideal test bed for these questions due to the control they give self-photographers when they compose the photograph. We used a database of images created by non-professional photographers (N=388). After analysis, we conclude that there little support for any of the three principles, suggesting that none is strongly rooted in spontaneous perceptual preferences.

  • Amirshahi S. A., Redies C., Denzler J. (2012). Assessment of the Rule of Thirds in Photographs Taken by Amateurs. Paper presented at VSAC Conference, Alghero, Italy.

  • BBC News magazine (2013). Self-portraits and social media: the rise of the ‘selfie’. 7 June 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22511650.

  • Bertamini M., Bennett K. M., Bode C. (2011). The anterior bias in visual art: the case of images of animals, Laterality 16, 673689.

  • Bruno N., Bertamini M. (2013). Self-portraits: smartphones reveal a side bias in non-artists, PLoS One 8, e55141.

  • Datta R., Joshi D., Li J., Wang J. Z. (2006). Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach, in: ECCV 2006 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Leonardis A., Bischof H., Pinz A. (Eds), pp.  288301. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fausing B. (2013). Selfies and the Search for Recognition. See for Your Selfie. Web article retrieved on November 1, 2013, http://www.academia.edu/4418191/Selfies_and_the_Search_for_Recognition._See_for_your_Selfie.

  • Fechner G. Th. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik, 2nd edn. Breitkopf and Härtel, Leipzig, Germany.

  • Gionni R. (2013). Autoritratti con lo smartphone: una Ricerca Empirica. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Università di Parma, Italy.

  • Green C. D. (1995). All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section, Perception 24, 937968.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Höge H. (1997). The golden section hypothesis: its last funeral, Empir. Stud. Arts 15, 233255.

  • Houghton D., Joinson A., Caldwell N., Marder B. (2013). Tagger’s Delight? Disclosure and Liking in Facebook: the Effects of Sharing Photographs amongst Multiple Known Social Circles, Discussion Paper, University of Birmingham Discussion Paper Series, Birmingham.

  • Krages B. (2005). Photography: The Art of Composition. Allworth Press, New York, NY, USA.

  • Lenman R. (Ed.) (2005). The Oxford Companion to the Photograph. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

  • Liu L., Chen R., Wolf L., Cohen-Or D. (2010). Optimizing photo composition, Comput. Graph. Forum 29, 469478.

  • Luo Y., Tang X. (2008). Photo and video quality evaluation: focusing on the subject, in: ECCV 2008, Part III, LNCS 5304, D. Forsyth, P. Torr and A. Zimmerman (Eds), pp. 386–399. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.

  • Machajdik J., Hanbury A. (2010). Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theor, Paper presented at the International Conference on Multimedia, New York, NY, USA.

  • McManus I. C., Humphrey N. K. (1973). Turning the left cheek, Nature 243, 271272.

  • McManus I., Stöver K., Kim D. (2011). Arnheim’s Gestalt theory of visual balance: examining the compositional structure of art photographs and abstract images, i-Perception 2, 615647.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McManus I. C., Thomas P. (2007). Eye centring in portraits: a theoretical and empirical evaluation, Perception 36, 167182; discussion 183–188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McManus I. C., Weatherby P. (1997). The golden section and the aesthetics of form and composition: a cognitive model, Empir. Stud. Arts 15, 209232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ohta H. (1999). Preferences in quadrangles reconsidered, Perception 28, 505517.

  • Pacioli L. (1509). De divina proportione (English: On the Divine Proportion), Luca Paganinem de Paganinus de Brescia (Antonio Capella): Venice.

  • Peterson B. (2003). Learning to See Creatively: Design, Color and Composition in Photography. Amphoto Press, New York, NY, USA.

  • Phillips F., Norman J. F., Beers A. M. (2010). Fechner’s aesthetics revisited, Seeing Perceiving 23, 263271.

  • Plug C. (1980). The golden section hypothesis, Am. J. Psychol. 93, 467487.

  • Russell P. A. (2000). The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context, Am. J. Psychol. 113, 2742.

  • Santella A., Agrawala M., deCarlo D., Salesin D., Cohen M. (2006). Gaze-based interaction for semi-automatic photo cropping, Paper presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.

  • Smith J. T. (1797). Remarks on Rural Scenery, with Twenty Etchings of Cottages, from Nature, and Some Observations and Precepts Relative to the Picturesque, printed for, and sold by Nathaniel Smith, Ancient Print Seller, at Rembrandt’s Head, May’s Buildings, St. Martin’s Lane, and I. T. Smith, at No 40 Trith Street, Soho, London, UK.

  • Tyler C. W. (1998). Painters centre one eye in portraits, Nature 392, 877878.

  • Tyler C. W. (2007a). Some principles of spatial organization in art, Spat. Vis. 20, 509530.

  • Tyler C. W. (2007b). Eye-centering in portraits: reply to McManus and Thomas, Perception 36, 183188.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 854 262 35
Full Text Views 167 10 0
PDF Views & Downloads 41 12 0