Boundaries, Transitions and Passages

In: Art & Perception
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Belgium
  • 2 Utrecht University, Netherlands
  • 3 University of Sassari, Italy

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Many pictures are approximately piecewise uniform quilts. The patches meet in transitional areas that have a vague, ribbon-like geometry. These borders may occasionally get lost and sometimes pick up again, creating a ‘passage’ that partly blends adjacent patches. This type of structure is widely discussed in treatises on painting technique. Similar effects (lost outlines, passages) occur in drawing. The border regions are characterized by width, or sharpness and amplitude – which is the contrast between the patches on each side. Moreover, border regions have various textural structures. We propose a formal theory of such transitions. Images can be understood as superpositions of border areas. Stylistic changes can be implemented through the selective treatment of borders. The theory is formally similar to, though crucially different in meaning from, the theory of ‘edges’ (a technical term) in image processing. We propose it as a formal framework that enables principled discussion of ‘edge qualities’ (a term used by painters in a way unrelated to the use of ‘edge’ in image processing) in a well-structured manner.

  • Balas B., , Nakano L., and Rosenholtz R. (2009). A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. J. Vis.9(12):13, 1–18. doi: 10.1167/9.12.13.

  • Bell J. (2006). The Continuous and the Infinitesimal in Mathematics and Philosophy, Polimetrica, Monza, Italy.

  • Boime A. (1993). The Art of the Macchia and the Risorgimento, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA and London, UK.

  • Brentano, F. von (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Duncker und Humblot, Leipzig, Germany.

  • Broude N. (1987). The Macchiaioli: Italian Painters of the Nineteenth Century, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA and London, UK.

  • Cateura L. (1995). Oil Painting Secrets from a Master, Watson & Guptill, New York, NY, USA.

  • Clifton J. (1973). The Eye of the Artist, North Light Publishers, Westport, CT, USA.

  • Cornsweet T. N. (1970). Visual Perception, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

  • Craik K. J. W. (1966). The Nature of Psychology: A Selection of Papers, Essays and Other Writings by Kenneth J. W. Craik, S. L. Sherwood (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.

  • Florack L. (1997). Image Structure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Freeman J., and Simoncelli E. (2011). Metamers of the ventral stream. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 11951201.

  • Gombrich E. H. (1963). Meditations on a Hobby Horse, Phaidon, London, UK and New York, NY, USA, p. 40 and plates 10–20.

  • Guptill A. L. (1928). Drawing with Pen and Ink, and a Word Concerning the Brush, The Pencil Points Press, New York, NY, USA.

  • Hatton R. G. (1904). Figure Drawing, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

  • Hess R. F. (1982). Developmental sensory impairment: amblyopia or tarachopia? Hum. Neurobiol. 1, 1729.

  • Imbriano V. (1868). La Quinta Promotrice 1867–1868: Appendici di Vittorio Imbriani, Tipografia Napolitana, Naples, Italy.

  • Jacobs T. S. (1986). Light for the Artist, Watson-Guptill, New York, NY, USA.

  • Kandinsky W. (1926). Punkt und Linie zu Fläche, Albert Langen, München, Germany.

  • Kanizsa G. (1955). Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea. Riv. Psicol. 49, 730.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1984). The structure of images. Biol. Cybern. 50, 363370.

  • Koenderink J. J. (1990). The brain a geometry engine. Psychol. Res. 52, 122127.

  • Koenderink J. J., and Van Doorn A. J. (1992). Generic neighbourhood operators. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 597605.

  • Koenderink J., , Van Doorn A., and Pinna B. (2015). Psychogenesis of Gestalt. Gestalt Theory 37, 287304.

  • Lindeberg T. (1994). Scale-space theory: A basic tool for analysing structures at different scales. J. Appl. Stat. 21(2), 224270.

  • Mach E. (1959, orig. 1897). The Analysis of Sensations, C. M. Williams and S. Waterlow (Transl.). Dover Edition, New York, NY, USA.

  • D. Margulis (1998). Sharpening with a stiletto. Electronic Publishing Magazine 1998.Available in The Makeready Archive Column 27 of 77. (https://www.ledet.com/margulis/Makeready/MA27-Sharpening_With_Stiletto.pdf).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Margulis D. (2005). Life on the edge. Electronic Publishing Magazine 2005. Available in The Makeready Archive Column 69 of 77. (https://www.ledet.com/margulis/Makeready/MA69-Life_on_the_Edge.pdf).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marimuthu M, , Muthaiah R, . and Swaminathan P. (2012). Review article: An overview of image compression techniques. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 4, 53815386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marr D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, Freeman, New York, NY, USA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Brien, V. (1959). Contrast by contour-enhancement. Am. J. Psychol. 72, 299300.

  • Palmer S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

  • Panconi T. (1999). Antologia dei Macchiaioli, La Trasformazione Sociale e Artica nella Toscana di metà 800, Pacini Editore, Pisa, Italy.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinna B. (1987). Un effetto di colorazione, in: Il Laboratorio e la Città, V. Majer, M. Maeran and M. Santinello (Eds), pp. 158, XXI Congresso degli Psicologi Italiani, Società Italiana di Psicologia, Milan, Italy.

  • Pinna B. (2008). Watercolor illusion. Scholarpedia 3, 5352. doi:

  • Pinna B., , Brelstaff G., and Spillmann L. (2001). Surface color from boundaries: A new ‘watercolor’ illusion. Vis. Res. 41, 26692676.

  • Pinna B., , Werner J., and Spillmann L. (2003). The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure-ground organization. Vis. Res. 43, 4352.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ratliff F. (1965). Mach Bands: Quantitative Studies on Neural Networks in the Retina. Holden Day, San Francisco, CA, USA.

  • Rosenholtz R. (2011). What your visual system sees when you are not looking, in: Proc. SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, XVI, B. E. Rogowitz and T. N. Pappas (Eds), 7865: 786510, San Francisco, CA, USA. doi: 10.1117/12.876659.

  • Rosenholtz R., , Huang J., and Ehinger K. A. (2012a). Rethinking the role of top-down attention in vision: Effects attributable to a lossy representation in peripheral vision. Front. Psychol.3, 13. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenholtz R., , Huang J., , Raj A., , Balas B. J., and Llie L. (2012b). A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. J. Vis. 12, 14. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Savant S. (2014). A review on edge detection techniques for image segmentation. Int. J. Comp. Sci. Inform. Technol. 5(4), 58985900.

  • Speed H. (1917). The Practice and Science of Drawing, Seeley, Service and Co., London, UK.

  • Ter Haar Romeny B. M. (2003). Front-End Vision and Multi-Scale Image Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Vasari G. (1912–1914; orig 1550 and 1568). Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors & Architects. Gaston du C. de Vere (Transl.), Macmillan and Co. Ltd. & the Medici Society, Ltd., London, UK.

  • Weegee with Speck Gerry (1964). Weegee’s Creative Photography. Ward, Lock & Co., London, UK and Melbourne, Australia.

  • Zadeh L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338353.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 256 91 4
Full Text Views 265 6 0
PDF Views & Downloads 16 6 0