Owners as a secure base for their dogs
In: BehaviourA modified version of the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test was used to analyse 40 dog–owner pairs in order to assess whether owners can represent a secure base for their dogs. The Wilcoxon test revealed significant differences between owner and stranger for protest at separation (whining), contact maintenance effect (proximity, attention seeking and physical contact) and secure base effect (exploration, individual play and social play). The results suggest that dogs behave similarly to children towards the mothers and to chimpanzees towards human caretakers in the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test: owners are the preferred recipient of affiliative behaviours and, in their absence, dogs show behaviours indicative of distress. After reunion with the owner, dogs show an increase in social behaviours towards him/her. Dogs did not show fear of the stranger, and it was regarded as a normal behaviour for adult well-socialized dogs. Until now whether owners represented a secure base for their dogs was debated, due to controversial results. This study found that dogs play and explore more when owners were present, suggesting that owners can represent a secure base for their dogs. Therefore, according to Bowlby’s definition, dogs are linked to their owners by an attachment bond.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ainsworth M.D.S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: a theoretical review of the infant–mother relationship. — Child. Dev. 40: 969-1025.
-
Ainsworth M.D.S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. — Am. Psychol. 44: 709-716.
-
Ainsworth M.D.S., Bell S.M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: illustrated by the behaviour of one-year-olds in a strange situation. — Child. Dev. 41: 49-67.
-
Bard K.A. (1991). Distribution of attachment classifications in nursery chimpanzees. — Am. J. Primatol. 24: 88.
-
Bard K.A., Nadler R.D. (1983). The effect of peer separation in young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). — Am. J. Primatol. 5: 25-37.
-
Bonanni R., Cafazzo S., Valsecchi P., Natoli E. (2010). Effect of affiliative and agonistic relationships on leadership behaviour in free-ranging dogs. — Anim. Behav. 79: 981-991.
-
Bowlby J. (1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1, Attachment. — Hogarth Press/Chatto & Windus, London.
-
Bowlby J. (1988). A secure base. — Routledge, London.
-
Fallani G., Prato-Previde E., Valsecchi P. (2006). Do disrupted early attachments affect the relationship between guide dogs and blind owners? — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100: 241-257.
-
Fallani G., Prato-Previde E., Valsecchi P. (2007). Behavioural and physiological responses of guide dogs to a situation of emotional distress. — Physiol. Behav. 90: 648-655.
-
Gácsi M., Topál J., Miklósi A., Doka A., Csányi V. (2001). Attachment behaviour of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers: forming new bonds. — J. Comp. Psychol. 115: 423-431.
-
Gácsi M., Maros K., Sernkvist S., Miklósi A. (2009). Does the owner provide a secure-base? Behavioural and heart rate response to a threatening stranger and to separation in dogs. — J. Vet. Behav. 4: 90-91.
-
Jensen G.D., Tolman C.W. (1965). Mother–infant relationship in the monkey, Macaca nemestrina: the effect of brief separation and mother–infant specificity. — J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55: 131-136.
-
Kaufman I.C., Rosenblum L.A. (1969). Effects of separation from mother on the emotional behaviour of infant monkeys. — Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 159: 681-695.
-
Kaulfuss P., Mills D.S. (2008). Neophilia in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and its implication for studies of dog cognition. — Anim. Cogn. 11: 553-556.
-
Lund D.J., Jørgensen M.C. (1999). Behaviour patterns and time course of activity in dog with separation anxiety. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63: 219-236.
-
Mariti C., Carlone B., Borgonini-Tarli S., Presciuttini S., Pierantoni L., Gazzano A. (2011). Considering the dog as part of the system: studying the attachment bond of dogs toward all members of the fostering family. — J. Vet. Behav. 6: 90-91.
-
Miller L.C., Bard K.A., Charles J.J., Nadler R.D. (1986). Behavioural responsiveness of young chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) to a novel environment. — Folia Primatol. 47: 128-142.
-
Miller L.C., Bard K.A., Charles J.J., Nadler R.D. (1990). Behavioural responsiveness to strangers in young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). — Folia Primatol. 55: 142-155.
-
Odendaal J.S.J., Meintjes R.A. (2003). Neurophysiological correlates of affiliative behaviour between humans and dogs. — Vet. J. 165: 296-301.
-
Nagasawa M., Shiori E., Mogi K., Kikusui T. (2012). Reciprocal communication and endocrine response in human–dog interactions. — Proc. 3rd Canine Science Forum, Barcelona, Spain, p. 6-7 (posters).
-
Palestrini C., Prato-Previde E., Spiezio C., Verga M. (2005). Heart rate and behavioural responses of dogs in the Ainsworth’s Strange Situation: a pilot study. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 94: 75-88.
-
Palestrini C., Minero M., Cannas S., Rossi E., Frank D. (2010). Video analysis of dogs with separation-related behaviours. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 124: 61-67.
-
Palmer R., Custance D. (2008). A counterbalanced version of Ainsworth’s strange situation procedure reveals secure-base effects in dog–human relationships. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109: 306-319.
-
Parthasarathy V., Crowell-Davis S.L. (2006). Relationship between attachment to owners and separation anxiety in pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris). — J. Vet. Behav. 1: 109-120.
-
Pettijohn T.F., Wong T.W., Ebert P.D., Scott J.P. (1977). Alleviation of separation distress in 3 breeds of young dogs. — Dev. Psychobiol. 10: 373-381.
-
Prato-Previde E., Custance D.M., Spiezio C., Sabatini F. (2003). Is the dog–human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth’s strange situation. — Behaviour 140: 225-254.
-
Schenkel R. (1967). Submission: its features and function in the wolf and dog. — Am. Zool. 7: 319-329.
-
Sroufe L., Waters E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. — Child. Dev. 48: 1184-1199.
-
Topál J., Miklósi A., Csányi V., Dóka A. (1998). Attachment behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) strange situation test. — J. Comp. Psychol. 12: 219-229.
-
Topál J., Gácsi M., Miklósi A., Virányi Z., Kubinyi E., Csányi V. (2005). Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies. — Anim. Behav. 70: 1367-1375.
-
Tuber D.S., Hennessy M.B., Sanders S., Miller J.A. (1996). Behavioural and glucocorticoid responses of adult domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to companionship and social separation. — J. Comp. Psychol. 110: 103-108.
-
Waters E., Sroufe L. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. — Dev. Rev. 3: 79-97.
-
Waters E., Cummings E.M. (2000). A secure base from which to explore close relationships. — Child. Dev. 71: 164-172.
-
White J.M., McBride A.E., Redhead E. (2010). Relationship between dog owner behaviour and dog attachment security in the strange situation. — J. Vet. Behav. 5: 47.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1559 | 550 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 479 | 108 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 241 | 162 | 4 |
A modified version of the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test was used to analyse 40 dog–owner pairs in order to assess whether owners can represent a secure base for their dogs. The Wilcoxon test revealed significant differences between owner and stranger for protest at separation (whining), contact maintenance effect (proximity, attention seeking and physical contact) and secure base effect (exploration, individual play and social play). The results suggest that dogs behave similarly to children towards the mothers and to chimpanzees towards human caretakers in the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test: owners are the preferred recipient of affiliative behaviours and, in their absence, dogs show behaviours indicative of distress. After reunion with the owner, dogs show an increase in social behaviours towards him/her. Dogs did not show fear of the stranger, and it was regarded as a normal behaviour for adult well-socialized dogs. Until now whether owners represented a secure base for their dogs was debated, due to controversial results. This study found that dogs play and explore more when owners were present, suggesting that owners can represent a secure base for their dogs. Therefore, according to Bowlby’s definition, dogs are linked to their owners by an attachment bond.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1559 | 550 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 479 | 108 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 241 | 162 | 4 |