Determinants of leadership in groups of female mallards

In: Behaviour
View More View Less
  • 1 Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR7178, 23 rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 2, France
  • 2 Université libre de Bruxelles, Unit of Social Ecology, Brussels, Belgium

When moving in groups, social animals tend to follow a leader which successfully attracted them. Many variables are known to affect an individual’s propensity to act as a leader. Depending on their nature, these variables underlie two theoretical paradigms (i) ‘leadership according to social indifference’, characterised by differences in personality or sociability, or (ii) ‘leadership according to need’, characterised by differences in energetic requirements or information content. Currently, it is not clear under which circumstances each of the two paradigms plays a larger role. Here, we tried to understand these paradigms by observing collective movements in female mallards. Each of these mallards previously learned individually to associate one of four locations in a maze with food rewards. We then formed groups of various compositions (group size range: 2–5 individuals) with respect to personality, sociability, energetic requirements, motivation and information content. We found that groups remained cohesive, and that certain individuals were consistent leaders within and between trials. The order of entering the maze was mainly determined by energetic requirements. However, soon after entering the maze, the progression order changed. Then, more socially indifferent individuals took the lead and this new order remained constant until all individuals reached the final location, which was usually the one the leader had learned. In addition, we investigated the role of naïve individuals in group decision-making. In our setup, adding naïve individuals broke the leadership consistency between trials and increased fission events. Overall, our results show that the onset of collective movements may be driven by different mechanisms compared to the movement progression itself.

  • Agresti A. (2002). Categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. — Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

  • Ákos Z., Beck R., Nagy M., Vicsek T., Kubinyi E. (2014). Leadership and path characteristics during walks are linked to dominance order and individual traits in dogs. — PLoS Comput. Biol. 10: e1003446. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Altmann J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-267.

  • Andrieu J., Henry S., Hausberger M., Thierry B. (2016). Informed horses are influential in group movements, but they may avoid leading. — Anim. Cogn. 19: 451-458. DOI:10.1007/s10071-015-0945-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aplin L.M., Farine D.R., Mann R.P., Sheldon B.C. (2014). Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 281: 20141016. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.1016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barelli C., Boesch C., Heistermann M., Reichard U.H. (2008). Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources. — Behaviour 145: 965-981. DOI:10.1163/156853908784089243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battesti M., Pasquaretta C., Moreno C., Joly D., Klensch E., Petit O., Sueur C., Mery F. (2015). Ecology of information: social transmission dynamics within groups of non-social insects. — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 282: 20142480. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2014.2480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beauchamp G. (2000). Individual differences in activity and exploration influence leadership in pairs of foraging zebra finches. — Behaviour 137: 301-314. DOI:10.1163/156853900502097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BirdLife International (2012). Anas platyrhynchos. In: The IUCN red list of threatened species — Version, 2015.4. — Available online at http://www.iucnredlist.org.

  • Biro D., Sumpter D.J.T., Meade J., Guilford T. (2006). From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing. — Curr. Biol. 16: 2123-2128. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.087.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Biro P.A., Stamps J.A. (2015). Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: ignore time-related change at your peril. — Anim. Behav. 105: 223-230. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourjade M., Sueur C. (2010). Shared or unshared consensus for collective movement? Towards methodological concerns. — Behav. Proc. 84: 648-652. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourjade M., Thierry B., Hausberger M., Petit O. (2015). Is leadership a reliable concept in animals? An empirical study in the horse. — PLoS ONE 10: e0126344. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bousquet C.A.H., Manser M.B. (2011). Resolution of experimentally induced symmetrical conflicts of interest in meerkats. — Anim. Behav. 81: 1101-1107. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.030.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bousquet C.A.H., Sumpter D.J.T., Manser M.B. (2011). Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 1482-1488. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2010.1739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bousquet C.A.H., Petit O., Arrivé M., Robin J.P., Sueur C. (2015). Personality tests predict responses to a spatial learning task in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). — Anim. Behav. 110: 145-154. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.09.024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Briard L., Dorn C., Petit O. (2015). Personality and affinities play a key role in the organisation of collective movements in a group of domestic horses. — Ethology 121: 888-902. DOI:10.1111/eth.12402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chase I.D., Tovey C., Spangler-Martin D., Manfredonia M. (2002). Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5744-5749. DOI:10.1073/pnas.082104199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen R.H.B. (2015). ordinal — Regression models for ordinal data. — R package version, 2015.1-21: http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/.

  • Conradt L. (2012). Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences. — Interface Focus. DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0090.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Conradt L., Krause J., Couzin I.D., Roper T.J. (2009). “Leading according to need” in self-organizing groups. — Am. Nat. 173: 304-312. DOI:10.1086/596532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Couzin I.D., Ioannou C.C., Demirel G., Gross T., Torney C.J., Hartnett A., Conradt L., Levin S.A., Leonard N.E. (2011). Uninformed individuals promote democratic consensus in animal groups. — Science 334: 1578-1580. DOI:10.1126/science.1210280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Desforges M.F., Wood-Gush D.G.M. (1975). A behavioural comparison of domestic and mallard ducks. Spatial relationships in small flocks. — Anim. Behav. 23: 698-705. DOI:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90146-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Farine D.R., Montiglio P.O., Spiegel O. (2015). From individuals to groups and back: the evolutionary implications of group phenotypic composition. — Trends. Ecol. Evol. 30: 609-621. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischhoff I.R., Sundaresan S.R., Cordingley J.E., Rubenstein D.I. (2007). Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii. — Anim. Behav. 73: 825-831. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flack A., Pettit B., Freeman R., Guilford T., Biro D. (2012). What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons. — Anim. Behav. 83: 703-709. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furrer R.D., Kunc H.P., Manser M.B. (2012). Variable initiators of group departure in a cooperative breeder: the influence of sex, age, state and foraging success. — Anim. Behav. 84: 205-212. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.034.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gautrais J. (2010). The hidden variables of leadership. — Behav. Proc. 84: 664-667. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.03.002.

  • Gibbons J.M., Lawrence A.B., Haskell M.J. (2010). Measuring sociability in dairy cows. — Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 122: 84-91. DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.11.011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harcourt J.L., Sweetman G., Manica A., Johnstone R.A. (2010). Pairs of fish resolve conflicts over coordinated movement by taking turns. — Curr. Biol. 20: 156-160. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hepp G.R. (1989). Benefits, costs, and determinants of dominance in American black ducks. — Behaviour 109: 222-234. DOI:10.1163/156853989X00240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ioannou C.C., Singh M., Couzin I.D. (2015). Potential leaders trade off goal-oriented and socially oriented behavior in mobile animal groups. — Am. Nat. 2: 284-293. DOI:10.1086/681988.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnstone R.A., Manica A. (2011). Evolution of personality differences in leadership. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 8373-8378. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1102191108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kerth G. (2010). Group decision-making in fission-fusion societies. — Behav. Proc. 84: 662-663. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.023.

  • King A.J. (2010). Follow me! I’m a leader if you do; I’m a failed initiator if you don’t? — Behav. Proc. 84: 671-674. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.03.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krause J., Bumann D., Todt D. (1992). Relationship between the position preference and nutritional state of individuals in schools of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 177-180. DOI:10.1007/BF00166700.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kurvers R.H.J.M., Adamczyk V.M.A.P., van Wieren S.E., Prins H.H.T. (2011). The effect of boldness on decision-making in barnacle geese is group-size-dependent. — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 278: 2018-2024. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2010.2266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lamprecht J. (1996). What makes an individual the leader of its group? An evolutionary concept of distance regulation and leadership. — Soc. Sci. Inf. 35: 595-617. DOI:10.1177/053901896035004001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leonard N.E., Shen T., Nabet B., Scardovi L., Couzin I.D., Levin S.A. (2012). Decision versus compromise for animal groups in motion. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 227-232. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1118318108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ligon R.A., Butler M.W. (2016). Body mass and immune function, but not bill coloration, predict dominance in female mallards. — Behav. Proc. 131: 59-67. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.08.010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liste G., Asher L., Broom D.M. (2014). When a duck initiates movement, do others follow? Testing preference in groups. — Ethology 120: 1199-1206. DOI:10.1111/eth.12294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McClure M., Ralph M., Despland E. (2011). Group leadership depends on energetic state in a nomadic collective foraging caterpillar. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1573-1579. DOI:10.1007/s00265-011-1167-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McComb K., Shannon G., Durant S.M., Sayialel K., Slotow R., Poole J., Moss C. (2011). Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 3270-3276. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2011.0168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McDonald N.D., Rands S.A., Hill F., Elder C., Ioannou C.C. (2016). Consensus and experience trump leadership, suppressing individual personality during social foraging. — Sci. Adv. 2: e1600892. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1600892.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller N., Garnier S., Hartnett A.T., Couzin I.D. (2013). Both information and social cohesion determine collective decisions in animal groups. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 5263-5268. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1217513110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakagawa S., Schielzeth H. (2010). Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. — Biol. Rev. 85: 935-956. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakagawa S., Schielzeth H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. — Methods Ecol. Evol. 4: 133-142. DOI:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nesterova A.P., Flack A., van Loon E.E., Bonadonna F., Biro D. (2015). The effect of experienced individuals on navigation by king penguin chick pairs. — Anim. Behav. 104: 69-78. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.03.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Brien R.M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. — Qual. Quant. 41: 673-690. DOI:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peig J., Green A.J. (2009). New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. — Oikos 118: 1883-1891. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petit O., Bon R. (2010). Decision-making processes: the case of collective movements. — Behav. Proc. 84: 635-647. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pillot M.H., Gautrais J., Gouello J., Michelena P., Sibbald A., Bon R. (2010). Moving together: incidental leaders and naïve followers. — Behav. Proc. 83: 235-241. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poisbleau M., Fritz H., Guillemain M., Lacroix A. (2005). Testosterone and linear social dominance status in captive male dabbling ducks in winter. — Ethology 111: 493-509. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01092.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Poisbleau M., Guillemain M., Demongin L., Carslake D., David J. (2009). Within-brood social status and consequences for winter hierarchies amongst Mallard Anas platyrhynchos ducklings. — J. Ornithol. 150: 195-204. DOI:10.1007/s10336-008-0334-6.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pyritz L.W., King A.J., Sueur C., Fichtel C. (2011). Reaching a consensus: terminology and concepts used in coordination and decision-making research. — Int. J. Primatol. 32: 1268-1278. DOI:10.1007/s10764-011-9524-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R core team (2015). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, available online at http://www.R-project.org/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramseyer A., Petit O., Thierry B. (2009). Decision-making in group departures of female domestic geese. — Behaviour 146: 351-371. DOI:10.1163/156853909X410955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasa O.A.E. (1987). The dwarf mongoose: a study of behavior and social structure in relation to ecology in a small, social carnivore. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 17: 121-163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rice W.R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. — Evolution 43: 223-225. DOI:10.2307/2409177.

  • Rosenthal S.B., Twomey C.R., Hartnett A.T., Wu H.S., Couzin I.D. (2015). Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 4690-4695. DOI:10.1079/pnas.1420068112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šárová R., Špinka M., Panamá J.L.A., Šimeček P. (2010). Graded leadership by dominant animals in a herd of female beef cattle on pasture. — Anim. Behav. 79: 1037-1045. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sibbald A.M., Erhard H.W., McLeod J.E., Hooper R.J. (2009). Individual personality and the spatial distribution of groups of grazing animals: an example with sheep. — Behav. Proc. 82: 319-326. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2009.07.011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silk M.J., Croft D.P., Tregenza T., Bearhop S. (2014). The importance of fission-fusion social group dynamics in birds. — Ibis 156: 701-715. DOI:10.1111/ibi.12191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith J.E., Kolowski J.M., Graham K.E., Dawes S.E., Holekamp K.E. (2008). Social and ecological determinants of fission-fusion dynamics in the spotted hyaena. — Anim. Behav. 76: 619-636. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.05.001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith J.E., Gavrilets S., Borgerhoff Mulder M., Hooper P.L., El Mouden C., Nettle D., Hauert C., Hill K., Perry S., Pusey A.E., van Vugt M., Alden Smith E. (2016). Leadership in mammalian societies: emergence, distribution, power, and payoff. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 31: 54-66. DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strandburg-Peshkin A., Farine D.R., Couzin I.D., Crofoot M.C. (2015). Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons. — Science 348: 1358-1361. DOI:10.1126/science.aaa5099.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueur C. (2012). Viability of decision-making systems in human and animal groups. — J. Theor. Biol. 306: 93-103. DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.04.020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueur C., Deneubourg J.L., Petit O., Couzin I.D. (2010). Differences in nutrient requirements imply a non-linear emergence of leaders in animal groups. — PLoS Comput. Biol. 6: e1000917. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueur C., Deneubourg J.L., Petit O. (2011). From the first intention movement to the last joiner: macaques combine mimetic rules to optimize their collective decisions. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 1697-1704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sueur C., King A.J., Pelé M., Petit O. (2013a). Fast and accurate decisions as a result of scale-free network properties in two primate species. — In: Proceedings of the European conference on complex systems (Gilbert, T., Kirkilionis, M. & Nicolis, G., eds), p. 579-584.

  • Sueur C., MacIntosh A.J.J., Jacobs A.T., Petit O. (2013b). Predicting leadership using nutrient requirements and dominance rank of group members. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 457-470. DOI:10.1007/s00265-012-1466-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trillmich J., Fichtel C., Kappeler P.M. (2004). Coordination of group movements in wild Verreaux’s sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi). — Behaviour 141: 1103-1120. DOI:10.1163/1568539042664579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Schaik C.P. (1999). The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in Orangutans. — Primates 40: 69-86. DOI:10.1007/BF02557703.

  • Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Elphick C.S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. — Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 3-14. DOI:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 190 85 3
Full Text Views 229 9 0
PDF Downloads 15 4 0