Duets in pair-bonding primates serve as a primary mode of communication between pairs, and duets may provide cues to conspecifics regarding the calling individual or pair. Here, we test the hypothesis that pulse elements in coppery titi monkey duets vary with condition and identity of the caller. We predicted that pulse elements would vary with age, sex, or pair-bond length. We estimated pulse rate and duration for 378 pulse elements from the duets of 74 captive titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus). We found inter-individual variation in both features, and evidence for vocal convergence among pair mates in pulse rate. Age was the best predictor of pulse rate, and pulse rate decreased with age. Age and pair-bond length reliably predicted pulse duration. Our results suggest that variation in titi monkey duets reflects differences in caller condition and pair identity, and contribute to growing evidence for vocal plasticity in nonhuman primates.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adret, P., Dingess, K., Caselli, C., Vermeer, J., Martínez, J., Luna Amancio, J., van Kuijk, S., Hernani Lineros, L., Wallace, R., Fernandez-Duque, E., Di Fiore, A., Adret, P., Dingess, K.A., Caselli, C.B., Vermeer, J., Martínez, J., Luna Amancio, J.C., Van Kuijk, S.M., Hernani Lineros, L.M., Wallace, R.B., Fernandez-Duque, E. & Di Fiore, A. (2018). Duetting patterns of titi monkeys (Primates, Pitheciidae: Callicebinae) and relationships with phylogeny. — Animals 8: 178.
Bales, K., Mason, W., Abbott, D., Mendoza, S., Tardif, S., Ruiz, J., Moeller, E.L., Williams, L., Schultz-Darken, N. & Bourgeois, S. (2013). Preparing new world monkeys for laboratory research. — ILAR J. 47: 307-315.
Ballentine, B., Hyman, J. & Nowicki, S. (2004). Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 163-168.
Bartoń, K. (2013). MuMIn: multi-model inference — R packag. version. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B.M. & Walker, S. (2017). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4 — R packag. version 1.1-13. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Bee, M.A. (2003). A test of the “dear enemy effect” in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 601-610.
Bergman, T.J., Beehner, J.C., Painter, M.C. & Gustison, M.L. (2019). The speech-like properties of nonhuman primate vocalizations. — Anim. Behav. 151: 229-237.
Bradbury, J. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Brotherton, P.N.M. & Komers, P.E. (2003). Mate guarding and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals. — In: Monogamy mating strategy. Partnerships birds, humans other mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 42-58.
Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. — Sociol. Methods Res. 33: 261-304.
Byers, J., Hebets, E.A. & Podos, J. (2010). Female choice based upon male motor performance. — Amin. Behav. 79: 771-778.
Caselli, C.B., Mennill, D.J., Gestich, C.C., Setz, E.Z.F. & Bicca-Marques, J.C. (2015). Playback responses of socially monogamous black-fronted titi monkeys to simulated solitary and paired intruders. — Am. J. Primatol. 77: 1135-1142.
Clink, D.J., Bernard, H., Crofoot, M.C. & Marshall, A.J. (2017). Investigating individual vocal signatures and small-scale patterns of geographic variation in female Bornean Gibbon (Hylobates muelleri) great calls. — Int. J. Primatol. 38: 656-671.
Clink, D.J., Grote, M.N., Crofoot, M.C. & Marshall, A.J. (2018). Understanding sources of variance and correlation among features of Bornean gibbon (Hylobates muelleri) female calls. — J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Clink, D.J., Tasirin, J.S. & Klinck, H. (2019). Vocal individuality and rhythm in male and female duet contributions of a nonhuman primate. — Curr. Zool. 0: 1-14.
Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Albon, S.D. (1979). The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. — Behaviour 69: 145-170.
Cramer, E.R.A. (2013). Physically challenging song traits, male quality, and reproductive success in house wrens. — PLoS ONE 8: e59208.
Dahlin, C.R. & Benedict, L. (2014). Angry birds need not apply: a perspective on the flexible form and multifunctionality of avian vocal duets. — Ethology 120: 1-10.
de Kort, S.R., Eldermire, E.R.B., Valderrama, S., Botero, C.A. & Vehrencamp, S.L. (2009). Trill consistency is an age-related assessment signal in banded wrens. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lomd. B: Biol. Sci. 276: 2315-2321.
Drăgănoiu, T.I., Nagle, L. & Kreutzer, M. (2002). Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 2525-2531.
DuBois, A.L., Nowicki, S. & Searcy, W.A. (2009). Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context. — Biol. Lett. 5: 163-165.
Fedurek, P., Slocombe, K.E., Enigk, D.K., Emery Thompson, M., Wrangham, R.W. & Muller, M.N. (2016). The relationship between testosterone and long-distance calling in wild male chimpanzees. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70: 659-672.
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. (2018). An R companion to applied regression. — Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Furutani, A., Mori, C. & Okanoya, K. (2018). Trill-calls in Java sparrows: repetition rate determines the category of acoustically similar calls in different behavioral contexts. — Behav. Proc. 157: 68-72.
Gamba, M., Torti, V., Estienne, V., Randrianarison, R.M., Valente, D., Rovara, P., Bonadonna, G., Friard, O. & Giacoma, C. (2016). The indris have got rhythm! Timing and pitch variation of a primate song examined between sexes and age classes. — Front. Neurosci. 10: 1-12.
Geissmann, T. (1984). Inheritance of song parameters in the Gibbon song, analysed in 2 hybrid gibbons (Hylobates pileatus × H. lar). — Folia Primatol. 42: 216-235.
Gillooly, J.F. & Ophir, A.G. (2010). The energetic basis of acoustic communication. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 277: 1325-1331.
Guo, J., Lee, D., Sakrejda, K., Gabry, J. & Goodrich, B. (2016). rstan: R interface to stan — R packag. version. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Hafen, T.G., Neveu, H., Rumpler, Y., Wilden, I. & Zimmermann, E. (1998). Acoustically dimorphic advertisement calls separate morphologically and genetically homogenous populations of the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). — Folia Primatol. 69(Suppl. 1): 342-356.
Hile, A.G., Plummer, T.K. & Striedter, G.F. (2000). Male vocal imitation produces call convergence during pair bonding in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. — Anim. Behav. 59: 1209-1218.
Janik, V.M. & Slater, P.J.B. (1997). Vocal learning in mammals. — Adv. Study Behav. 26: 59-100.
Kassambara, A. (2018). ggpubr: “ggplot2” based publication ready plots.
Komdeur, J. (2001). Mate guarding in the Seychelles warbler is energetically costly and adjusted to paternity risk. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 2103-2111.
Laiolo, P., Tella, J.L., Carrete, M., Serrano, D. & Lopez, G. (2004). Distress calls may honestly signal bird quality to predators. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271: S513-S515.
Lameira, A.R. & Wich, S.A. (2008). Orangutan long call degradation and individuality over distance: a playback approach. — Int. J. Primatol. 29: 615-625.
Lau, A., Clink, D.J., Crofoot, M.C. & Marshall, A.J. (2018). Evidence for high variability in temporal features of the male coda in Müller’s Bornean gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). — Int. J. Primatol. 39: 670-684.
Leliveld, L.M.C., Scheumann, M. & Zimmermann, E. (2011). Acoustic correlates of individuality in the vocal repertoire of a nocturnal primate (Microcebus murinus). — J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129: 2278-2288.
Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Petit, E.J. & Zuberbühler, K. (2011). Social learning of vocal structure in a nonhuman primate?. — BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 362.
Lesbarrères, D. & Lodé, T. (2002). Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. — Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14: 287-295.
Levréro, F., Touitou, S., Frédet, J., Nairaud, B., Guéry, J.-P. & Lemasson, A. (2019). Social bonding drives vocal exchanges in Bonobos. — Sci. Rep. 9: 711.
Linhart, P., Jaška, P., Petrusková, T., Petrusek, A. & Fuchs, R. (2013). Being angry, singing fast? Signalling of aggressive motivation by syllable rate in a songbird with slow song. — Behav. Proc. 100: 139-145.
Marshall, A.J., Wrangham, R.W. & Arcadi, A.C. (1999). Does learning affect the structure of vocalizations in chimpanzees?. — Anim. Behav. 58: 825-830.
Marshall-Ball, L., Mann, N. & Slater, P.J.B. (2006). Multiple functions to duet singing: hidden conflicts and apparent cooperation. — Anim. Behav. 71: 823-831.
Martínez-Rivera, C.C. & Gerhardt, H.C. (2008). Advertisement-call modification, male competition, and female preference in the bird-voiced treefrog Hyla avivoca. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63: 195-208.
Mathevon, N., Casey, C., Reichmuth, C. & Charrier, I. (2017). Northern elephant seals memorize the rhythm and timbre of their rivals’ voices. — Curr. Biol. 27: 2352-2356.
Mendoza, S.P. & Mason, W.A. (1986). Contrasting responses to intruders and to involuntary separation by monogamous and polygynous new world monkeys. — Physiol. Behav. 38: 795-801.
Merlo, J., Chaix, B., Yang, M. & Lynch, J. (2005). A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: linking the statistical concept of clustering to the idea of contextual phenomenon. — J. Epidemiol. 59: 443-449.
Mitani, J. & Gros-Louis, J. (1998). Chorusing and call convergence in chimpanzees: tests of three hypotheses. — Behaviour 135: 1041-1064.
Mitani, J.C., Gros-Louis, J. & Macedonia, J.M. (1996). Selection for acoustic individuality within the vocal repertoire of wild chimpanzees. — Int. J. Primatol. 17: 569-583.
Moser-Purdy, C. & Mennill, D.J. (2018). Large vocal repertoires do not constrain the dear enemy effect: a playback experiment and comparative study of songbirds. — Anim. Behav. 118: 55-64.
Müller, A.E. & Anzenberger, G. (2002). Duetting in the Titi monkey Callicebus cupreus: structure, pair specificity and development of duets. — Folia Primatol. 73: 104-115.
Ophir, A.G., Schrader, S.B. & Gillooly, J.F. (2010). Energetic cost of calling: general constraints and species-specific differences. — J. Evol. Biol. 23: 1564-1569.
Papworth, S., Herbinger, I., Zuberbühler, K. & Boesch, C. (2009). Vocal, gestural and locomotor responses of wild chimpanzees to familiar and unfamiliar intruders: a playback study. — Anim. Behav. 78: 1389-1396.
Pasch, B., George, A.S., Campbell, P. & Phelps, S.M. (2011). Androgen-dependent male vocal performance influences female preference in Neotropical singing mice. — Anim. Behav. 82: 177-183.
Porter, A.M. (2016). Variability in the social lives of red Titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor) and equatorial saki monkeys (Pithecia equatorialis), two pair-living primates in Ecuador. — University of California, Davis, CA.
R Development Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Radford, A.N. (2005). Group-specific vocal signatures and neighbour-stranger discrimination in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe. — Anim. Behav. 70: 1227-1234.
Riebel, K., Odom, K.J., Langmore, N.E. & Hall, M.L. (2019). New insights from female bird song: towards an integrated approach to studying male and female communication roles. — Biol. Lett. 15: 20190059.
Robinson, J.G. (1979a). An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey Callicebus moloch. — Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 381-405.
Robinson, J.G. (1979b). Use of space by groups vocal regulation of titi monkeys Callicebus moloch. — Behav. Ecol. 5: 1-15.
Robinson, J.G. (1981). Vocal regulation of inter- and intragroup spacing during boundary encounters in the titi monkey, Callicebus moloch. — Primates 22: 161-172.
Rothwell, E.S. (2018). The neurobiological and physiological basis of pair bond maintenance behavior in socially monogamous titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus). — University of California, Davis.
Scherer, K.R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. — Psychol. Bull. 99: 143.
Siebert, E.R. & Parr, L.A. (2003). A structural and contextual analysis of chimpanzee screams. — Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1000: 104-109.
Smith, J.M. & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Snowdon, C.T. (2009). Plasticity of communication in nonhuman primates. — Adv. Study Behav. 40: 239-276.
Snowdon, C.T. (2017). Learning from monkey “talk”. — Science 355: 1120-1122.
Snowdon, C.T. & Elowson, A.M. (1999). Pygmy marmosets modify call structure when paired. — Ethology 105: 893-908.
Szymkowiak, J. & Kuczyński, L. (2017). Song rate as a signal of male aggressiveness during territorial contests in the wood warbler. — J. Avian Biol. 48: 275-283.
Tanaka, T., Sugiura, H. & Masataka, N. (2006). Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of the development of group differences in acoustic features of coo calls in two groups of Japanese macaques. — Ethology 112: 7-21.
Terleph, T.A., Malaivijitnond, S. & Reichard, U.H. (2016). Age related decline in female lar Gibbon great call performance suggests that call features correlate with physical condition. — BMC Evol. Biol. 16: 4.
Terleph, T.A., Malaivijitnond, S. & Reichard, U.H. (2018). Male white-handed gibbons flexibly time duet contributions. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72: 16.
Valeggia, C.R., Mendoza, S.P., Fernandez-Duque, E., Mason, W.A. & Lasley, B. (1999). Reproductive biology of female titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch) in captivity. — Am. J. Primatol. 47: 183-195.
Van Belle, S., Fernandez-Duque, E. & Di Fiore, A. (2016). Demography and life history of wild red titi monkeys (Callicebus discolor) and equatorial sakis (Pithecia aequatorialis) in Amazonian Ecuador: a 12-year study. — Am. J. Primatol. 78: 204-215.
Vehrencamp, S.L., Yantachka, J., Hall, M.L. & de Kort, S.R. (2013). Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 409-419.
Vehrencamp, S.L. (2000). Handicap, index, and conventional signal elements of bird song. — In: Animal signals: signaling and signal design in animal communication (Rosenqvist, G., Amundsen, T. & Esprnark, Y., eds). Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, Norway, p. 277-300.
Wilkins, M.R., Seddon, N. & Safran, R.J. (2012). Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 156-166.
Wright, P.C. (1990). Patterns of paternal care in primates. — Int. J. Primatol. 11: 89-102.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 672 | 298 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 64 | 25 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 65 | 34 | 3 |
Duets in pair-bonding primates serve as a primary mode of communication between pairs, and duets may provide cues to conspecifics regarding the calling individual or pair. Here, we test the hypothesis that pulse elements in coppery titi monkey duets vary with condition and identity of the caller. We predicted that pulse elements would vary with age, sex, or pair-bond length. We estimated pulse rate and duration for 378 pulse elements from the duets of 74 captive titi monkeys (Plecturocebus cupreus). We found inter-individual variation in both features, and evidence for vocal convergence among pair mates in pulse rate. Age was the best predictor of pulse rate, and pulse rate decreased with age. Age and pair-bond length reliably predicted pulse duration. Our results suggest that variation in titi monkey duets reflects differences in caller condition and pair identity, and contribute to growing evidence for vocal plasticity in nonhuman primates.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 672 | 298 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 64 | 25 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 65 | 34 | 3 |