Howling by the river: howler monkey (Alouatta palliata) communication in an anthropogenically-altered riparian forest in Costa Rica

In: Behaviour
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Anthropology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, CanadaN2L 3G1
  • | 2 Department of Biology, Regis University, Denver, CO 80221, USA
  • | 3 The Maderas Rainforest Conservancy, P.O. Box 55-7519, Miami, FL 33255-7519, USA
  • | 4 Department of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA
  • | 5 Department of Anthropology, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA, USA
  • | 6 Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  • | 7 Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The ways that forest edges may affect animal vocalization behaviour are poorly understood. We investigated the effects of various types of edge habitat on the loud calls (howls) of a folivorous-frugivorous primate species, Alouatta palliata, with reference to the ecological resource defence hypothesis, which predicts that males howl to defend vegetation resources. We tested this hypothesis across four forest zones — interior, riparian, anthropogenic, and combined forest edges — in a riparian forest fragment in Costa Rica. We predicted vegetation and howling would differ between forest zones, with riparian and interior zones showing the highest values and anthropogenic edge the lowest. Our results indicated that vegetation was richer and howling longer in riparian and interior zones compared to combined and anthropogenic edges, supporting the resource defence hypothesis and providing some of the first evidence in animal communication scholarship for differences in behavioural edge effects between natural riparian and anthropogenic edges.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1141 297 7
Full Text Views 98 29 3
PDF Views & Downloads 89 61 6