Does recent experience affect large male advantage in a sequentially-mating fish?
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Emily R. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Laura K. Weir in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In many mating systems, large male body size is associated with dominance in direct contests with rivals and females may exhibit preference for larger males. As such, body size is often positively associated with mating success. However, mating experience can influence the potential advantage of large body size through alterations in behaviour and depletion of sperm reserves. In Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), males mate with many females each day, and larger males mate more frequently than smaller males. In an observational experiment, we tested the following alternate predictions: (1) recent mating experience may enhance mating success through a carry-over effect of prior mating, whereby small experienced males gain an advantage over large inexperienced rivals in mating contests; or (2) recent mating experience decreases mating success through a reduction in fertilization due to sperm limitation, effectively dampening the large-male advantage against a small inexperienced rival. We examined the interactive effect of size and recent experience on mating behaviour and success. While mating contests were monopolized by large males, recent experience enhanced mating success, especially in small male winners. Experienced males courted more readily than those without recent experience, suggesting that recent prior mating enhances this behaviour. Furthermore, males who had copulated recently did not exhibit sperm depletion when in the presence of a competitor, nor did female behaviour indicate a preference for inexperienced males. This suggests that males can use sexual experience to increase their reproductive success in future mating situations, which may influence the action of sexual selection and alternative tactics in shaping mating systems.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Allen, E.R. (2019). Plasticity and selection of male sexual traits across operational sex ratios in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). — M.Sc. thesis, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS.
-
Bisazza, A. & Marconato, A. (1988). Female mate choice, male–male competition and parental care in the river bullhead, Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae). — Anim. Behav. 36: 1352-1360.
-
Bisazza, A., Marconato, A. & Marin, G. (1989). Male competition and female choice in Padogobius martensi (Pisces, Gobiidae). — Anim. Behav. 38: 406-413.
-
Blaul, B. & Ruther, J. (2012). Body size influences male pheromone signals but not the outcome of mating contests in Nasonia vitripennis. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1557-1563.
-
Candolin, U. & Voigt, H.-R. (2001). Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequence of male competition or predation susceptibility? — Oikos 95: 225-230.
-
Chellappa, S., Yamamoto, M.E., Cacho, M.S.R.F. & Huntingford, F.A. (1999). Prior residence, body size and the dynamics of territorial disputes between male freshwater angelfish. — J. Fish Biol. 55: 1163-1170.
-
Dewsbury, D.A. (1982). Ejaculate cost and male choice. — Am. Nat. 119: 601-610.
-
Dickerson, B.R., Quinn, T.P. & Willson, M.F. (2002). Body size, arrival date, and reproductive success of pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha. — Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 14: 29-44.
-
Dukas, R. (2005a). Experience improves courtship in male fruit flies. — Anim. Behav. 69: 1203-1209.
-
Dukas, R. (2005b). Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. — Behav. Ecol. 16: 800-804.
-
Dyakonova, V. & Krushinsky, A. (2008). Previous motor experience enhances courtship behavior in male cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. — J. Insect Behav. 21: 172-180.
-
Filice, D.C.S. & Dukas, R. (2019). Winners have higher pre-copulatory mating success but losers have better post-copulatory outcomes. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 286: 20182838.
-
Graham, J.M. & Desjardins, C. (1980). Classical conditioning: induction of luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion in anticipation of sexual activity. — Science 210: 1039-1041.
-
Grant, J.W.A., Casey, P.C., Bryant, M.J. & Shahsavarani, A. (1995). Operational sex ratio, mediated by synchrony of female arrival, alters the variance of male mating success in Japanese medaka. — Anim. Behav. 49: 367-375.
-
Grant, J.W.A. & Green, L.D. (1996). Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). — Behav. Ecol. 7: 165-167.
-
Haley, M.P., Deutsch, C.J. & Le Boeuf, B.J. (1994). Size, dominance and copulatory success in male northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris. — Anim. Behav. 48: 1249-1260.
-
Hamilton, J.B., Walter, R.O., Daniel, R.M. & Mestler, G.E. (1969). Competition for mating between ordinary and supermale Japanese medaka fish. — Anim. Behav. 17: 168-176.
-
Harris, W.E. & Moore, P.J. (2005). Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts. — Am. Nat. 165: S64-S71.
-
Harrison, L.M., Jennions, M.D. & Head, M.L. (2018). Does the winner–loser effect determine male mating success? — Biol. Lett. 14: 20180195.
-
Hebets, E.A. & Sullivan-Beckers, L. (2010). Mate choice and learning. — In: Encyclopedia of animal behavior (Breed, M.D. & Moore, J., eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 389-393.
-
Hoefler, C.D., Moore, J.A., Reynolds, K.T. & Rypstr, A.L. (2010). The effect of experience on male courtship and mating behaviors in a cellar spider. — Am. Midl. Nat. 163: 255-268.
-
Hoelzer, G.A. (1990). Male–male competition and female choice in the Cortez damselfish, Stegastes rectifraenum. — Anim. Behav. 40: 339-349.
-
Howard, R.D., DeWoody, J.A. & Muir, W.M. (2004). Transgenic male mating advantage provides opportunity for Trojan gene effect in a fish. — Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101: 2934-2938.
-
Howard, R.D., Martens, R.S., Innis, S.A., Drnevich, J.M. & Hale, J. (1998). Mate choice and mate competition influence male body size in Japanese medaka. — Anim. Behav. 55: 1151-1163.
-
Hsu, Y., Earley, R.L. & Wolf, L.L. (2006). Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. — Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81: 33-74.
-
Iglesias-Carrasco, M., Jennions, M.D., Ho, S.Y.W. & Duchêne, D.A. (2019). Sexual selection, body mass and molecular evolution interact to predict diversification in birds. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 286: 20190172.
-
Iwamatsu, T., Onitake, K., Yoshimoto, Y. & Hiramoto, Y. (1991). Time sequence of early events in fertilization in the medaka egg. — Dev. Growth Diff. 33: 479-490.
-
Kamel, F., Mock, E.J., Wright, W.W. & Frankel, A.I. (1975). Alterations in plasma concentrations of testosterone, LH, and prolactin associated with mating in the male rat. — Horm. Behav. 6: 277-288.
-
Keleman, K., Vrontou, E., Krüttner, S., Yu, J.Y., Kurtovic-Kozaric, A. & Dickson, B.J. (2012). Dopamine neurons modulate pheromone responses in Drosophila courtship learning. — Nature 489: 145-149.
-
King, B.H. & Fischer, C.R. (2010). Male mating history: effects on female sexual responsiveness and reproductive success in the parasitoid wasp Spalangia endius. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 607-615.
-
Lindström, K. & Hellström, M. (1993). Male size and parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. — Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 5: 97-106.
-
Losey, G.S., Stanton, F.G., Telecky, T.M. & Tyler, W.A. (1986). Copying others, an evolutionarily stable strategy for mate choice: a model. — Am. Soc. Nat. 128: 653-664.
-
Loyau, A., Blanchet, S., Van Laere, P., Clobert, J. & Danchin, E. (2012). When not to copy: female fruit flies use sophisticated public information to avoid mated males. — Sci. Rep. 2: 1-6.
-
Markow, T.A., Quaid, M. & Kerr, S. (1978). Male mating experience and competitive courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster. — Nature 276: 821-822.
-
Molina, Y. & Christenson, T. (2008). Effects of mating experience on subsequent reproductive behaviour and sperm release in the spider Nesticodes rufipes. — Anim. Behav. 76: 1327-1334.
-
Nakatsuru, K. & Kramer, D.L. (1982). Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (Pisces, Characidae). — Science 216: 753-755.
-
O’Dea, R.E., Jennions, M.D. & Head, M.L. (2014). Male body size and condition affects sperm number and production rates in mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. — J. Evol. Biol. 27: 2739-2744.
-
Oliveira, R.F., Silva, A. & Canário, A.V.M. (2009). Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 276: 2249-2256.
-
Ono, Y. & Uematsu, T. (1957). Mating ethogram in Oryzias latipes. — J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido. Univer. Ser. VI. Zool 13: 197-202.
-
Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M.J.G. (1996). Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 263: 1291-1297.
-
Perez-Staples, D., Aluja, M., Macías-Ordóñez, R. & Sivinski, J. (2008). Reproductive trade-offs from mating with a successful male: the case of the tephritid fly Anastrepha obliqua. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1333-1340.
-
Pérez-Staples, D., Martínez-Hernández, M.G. & Aluja, M. (2010). Male age and experience increases mating success but not female fitness in the Mexican fruit fly. — Ethology 116: 778-786.
-
Pilastro, A., Scaggiante, M. & Rasotto, M.B. (2002). Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 9913-9915.
-
Preston, B.T., Stevenson, I.R., Pemberton, J.M. & Wilson, K. (2001). Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. — Nature 409: 681-682.
-
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: do females copy each other? — Am. Nat. 140: 1000-1009.
-
R Core Team (2020). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
-
Reynolds, J.D. & Côté, I.M. (1995). Direct selection on mate choice: female redlip blennies pay more for better mates. — Behav. Ecol. 6: 175-181.
-
Ribeiro, P.D., Daleo, P. & Iribarne, O.O. (2010). Density affects mating mode and large male mating advantage in a fiddler crab. — Oecologia 164: 931-941.
-
Rittschof, C.C. (2010). Male density affects large-male advantage in the golden silk spider, Nephila clavipes. — Behav. Ecol. 21: 979-985.
-
Rutte, C., Taborsky, M. & Brinkhof, M.W.G. (2006). What sets the odds of winning and losing? — Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 16-21.
-
Ryan, M.J., Hews, D.K. & Wagner Jr., W.E. (1990). Sexual aelection on alleles that determine body size in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 231-237.
-
Saleem, S., Ruggles, P.H., Abbott, W.K. & Carney, G.E. (2014). Sexual experience enhances Drosophila melanogaster male mating behavior and success. — PLoS ONE 9: e96639.
-
Schlaepfer, M.A. & McNeil, J.N. (2000). Are virgin male lepidopterans more successful in mate acquisition than previously mated individuals? A study of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). — Can. J. Zool. 78: 2045-2050.
-
Schuett, G.W. (1997). Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. — Anim. Behav. 54: 213-224.
-
Sih, A., Bell, A.M. & Johnson, J.C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372-378.
-
Sirot, E. (2001). Mate-choice copying by females: the advantages of a prudent strategy. — J. Evol. Biol. 14: 418-423.
-
Stamps, J.A. & Krishnan, V.V. (1994). Territory acquisition in lizards: II. Establishing social and spatial relationships. — Anim. Behav. 47: 1387-1499.
-
Teseo, S., Veerus, L. & Mery, F. (2016). Fighting experience affects fruit fly behavior in a mating context. — Sci. Nat. 103: 38-41.
-
Thonhauser, K.E., Raffetzeder, A. & Penn, D.J. (2019). Sexual experience has no effect on male mating or reproductive success in house mice. — Sci. Rep. 9: 1-11.
-
Torres-Vila, L.M. & Jennions, M.D. (2005). Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57: 318-326.
-
Walter, R.O. & Hamilton, J.B. (1970). Head-up movements as an indicator of sexual unreceptivity in female medaka, Oryzias latipes. — Anim. Behav. 18: 125-127.
-
Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G. & Parker, G.A. (2002). Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 313-320.
-
Weir, L.K. (2013). Male–male competition and alternative male mating tactics influence female behavior and fertility in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 193-203.
-
Weir, L.K. & Grant, J.W.A. (2010). Courtship rate signals fertility in an externally fertilizing fish. — Biol. Lett. 6: 727-731.
-
Whalen, R.E. (1966). Sexual motivation. — Psychol. Rev. 73: 151-163.
-
Whitehouse, M.E.A. (1997). Experience influences male–male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). — Anim. Behav. 53: 913-923.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 602 | 274 | 31 |
| Full Text Views | 27 | 11 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 48 | 23 | 6 |
Does recent experience affect large male advantage in a sequentially-mating fish?
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Emily R. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura K. Weir in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In many mating systems, large male body size is associated with dominance in direct contests with rivals and females may exhibit preference for larger males. As such, body size is often positively associated with mating success. However, mating experience can influence the potential advantage of large body size through alterations in behaviour and depletion of sperm reserves. In Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes), males mate with many females each day, and larger males mate more frequently than smaller males. In an observational experiment, we tested the following alternate predictions: (1) recent mating experience may enhance mating success through a carry-over effect of prior mating, whereby small experienced males gain an advantage over large inexperienced rivals in mating contests; or (2) recent mating experience decreases mating success through a reduction in fertilization due to sperm limitation, effectively dampening the large-male advantage against a small inexperienced rival. We examined the interactive effect of size and recent experience on mating behaviour and success. While mating contests were monopolized by large males, recent experience enhanced mating success, especially in small male winners. Experienced males courted more readily than those without recent experience, suggesting that recent prior mating enhances this behaviour. Furthermore, males who had copulated recently did not exhibit sperm depletion when in the presence of a competitor, nor did female behaviour indicate a preference for inexperienced males. This suggests that males can use sexual experience to increase their reproductive success in future mating situations, which may influence the action of sexual selection and alternative tactics in shaping mating systems.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 602 | 274 | 31 |
| Full Text Views | 27 | 11 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 48 | 23 | 6 |
