Save

The administration of probiotics and synbiotics in immune compromised adults: is it safe?

In: Beneficial Microbes
Authors:
M. Van den Nieuwboer Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for other papers by M. Van den Nieuwboer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R.J. Brummer School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82 Örebro, Sweden

Search for other papers by R.J. Brummer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. Guarner Food Microbiology and Biotechnology Digestive System Research Unit, CIBERehd, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron,, 08035 Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by F. Guarner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Morelli Istituto di Microbiologia Università Cattolica S.C.,, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy

Search for other papers by L. Morelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Cabana Departments of Pediatrics, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 3333 California Street, #245, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA

Search for other papers by M. Cabana in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
E. Claassen

Search for other papers by E. Claassen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Open Access

This study aimed to systematically evaluate safety of probiotics and synbiotics in immune compromised adults (≥18 years). Safety was analysed using the Common Terminology Clinical Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.0) classification, thereby providing an update on previous reports using the most recent available clinical data (2008-2013). Safety aspects are represented and related to number of participants per probiotic strain/culture, study duration, dosage, clinical condition and selected afflictions. Analysis of 57 clinical studies indicates that probiotic and/or synbiotic administration in immune compromised adults is safe with regard to the current evaluated probiotic strains, dosages and duration. Individuals were considered immune compromised if HIV-infected, critically ill, underwent surgery or had an organ- or an autoimmune disease. There were no major safety concerns in the study, as none of the serious adverse events (AE)s were related, or suspected to be related, to the probiotic or synbiotic product and the study products were well tolerated. Overall, AEs occurred less frequent in immune compromised subjects receiving probiotics and/or synbiotics compared to the control group. In addition, the results demonstrated a flaw in precise reporting and classification of AE in most studies. Furthermore, generalisability of conclusions are greatly limited by the inconsistent, imprecise and potentially incomplete reporting as well as the variation in probiotic strains, dosages, administration regimes, study populations and reported outcomes. We argue that standardised reporting on adverse events (CTCAE) in ‘food’ studies should be obligatory, thereby improving reliability of data and re-enforcing the safety profile of probiotics.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 422 352 34
PDF Views & Downloads 449 372 27