The effect of a traditional and a stick gang-line on the body position of working sled dogs
In: Comparative Exercise PhysiologySearch for other papers by F. Pittet in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by C.M. McGowan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by H.K. Hyytiäinen in
Current site
Google Scholar
This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different gang-lines on the pulling angle of sled dogs. It was hypothesised that dogs would run with a straighter angle of pull (in relation to the main-line) in stick gang-lines (STICK) than they would do in traditional gang-lines (TRAD). Eight sled dogs, divided into two teams, ran a 3.1 km trail twice in both types of gang-lines, pulling a quadbike on dry ground. Each dog remained in its team in the same position (side of gang line, and forward or back in the line) for both runs, using both types of lines in randomised order between the runs. Markers were placed on the dogs and on the main lines, and the runs were recorded by a video camera. The dogs’ angle of pull measured from the video recordings was compared between the two conditions. Thirteen positional measurements for each dog during each run were taken. The dogs were used to running in TRAD and were not acclimatised to STICK. Data was analysed using Wilcoxon and Spearmans rho tests. Data regarding individual dogs (n=13), teams (n=52), dogs’ placements in teams (n=4), and gang-line related pulling angles (n=104) was analysed. Overall, the position of the dogs was straighter when pulling in STICK, than when pulling in TRAD, with a median of 19° (inter quartile range (IQR) 24.75°) and 32° (IQR 25.75°), respectively (P<0.001). Between the two teams, there was no significant difference in pulling positions when running in STICK (P=0.543), but there was in TRAD (P<0.001). In individual assessment, six of the eight dogs ran in a straighter position (P=0.003 to 0.046) in STICK. Dogs running in the front of both teams pulled significantly straighter when in STICK (21°; IQR 23.75) than in TRAD (median 39°; IQR 18; P<0.001).
-
Brown, S.K., Darwent, C.W., Wictum, E.J. and Sacks, B.N., 2015. Using multiple markers to elucidate the ancient, historical and modern relationships among North American artic dog breeds. Heredity 115: 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.49
-
Carter, A.J. and Hall, E.J., 2018. Investigating factors affecting the body temperature of dogs competing in cross country (canicross) races in the UK. Journal of Thermal Biology 72: 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.12.006
-
Coppinger, R., Coppinger, L. and Skillings, E., 1998. Observations on assistance dog training and use. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 1: 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0102_4
-
Femundlopet, 2018. The track 2019. Femundlopet, Røros, Norway. Available at: https://femundlopet.no/en/the-track/
-
Finnmarkslopet, 2018. The trail. Finnmarkslopet, Alta, Norway. Available at: http://www.finnmarkslopet.no/home-trail/
-
Fischer, M.S. and Lilje, K.E., 2014. Muscles. In: Fischer, M.S. and Lilje, K.E. (eds.) Dogs in motion, 2nd edition. VDH Service GmbH, Dortmund, Germany, pp. 98-129.
'Muscles ', () 98 -129.
-
Foss, K., Da Costa, R.C. and Moore, S., 2013. Three-dimensional kinematic gait analysis of Doberman pinschers with and without cervical spondylomyelopathy. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 27: 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.12012
-
Gomez Alvarez, C.B., Gustas, P., Bergh, A. and Rhodin, M., 2017. Vertical head and pelvic movement symmetry at the trot in dogs with induced supporting limb lameness. The Veterinary Journal 229: 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.10.011
-
Grabowski, A.M. and Kram, R., 2008. Running with horizontal pulling forces: the benefits of towing. European Journal of Applied Physiology 104: 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0785-8
-
Grandjean, D., 1989. Entraînement ou course: le matériel nécessaire. In: Grandjean, D. (ed.) Les chiens de traîneaux: de la peur du loup à l’amour d’un chien, 1st edition. Editions Amphora s.a., Paris, France, pp. 55-80.
'Entraînement ou course: le matériel nécessaire ', () 55 -80.
-
Gysin, P., Kaminski, T.R., Hass, C.J., Grobet, C.E. and Gordon, A., 2008. Effects of gait variations on grip force coordination during object transport. Journal of Neurophysiology 100: 2477-2485. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90561.2008
-
Helton, W.S., 2007. Skill in expert dogs. Journal of Experimental and Psychologial Applications 13: 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.3.171
-
Hetta Huskies, 2018. Husky safaris. Hetta Huskies, Enontekiö, Finland. Available at: http://www.hettahuskies.com/en/activities/multi-day-husky-safaris
-
Hicks, D.A. and Millis, D.L., 2014. Kinetic and kinematic evaluation of compensatory movements of the head, pelvis and thoracolumbar spine associated with asymmetric weigth bearing of the pelvic limbs in trotting dogs. Veterinary Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 27: 453-460. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-14-04-0057
-
Hildebrand, M., 1968. Symmetrical gaits of dogs in relation to body build. Journal of Morphology 124: 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051240308
-
Holden-Douilly, L., Pourcelot, P., Desquillbet, L., Falala, S., Crevier-Denoix, N. and Chateau, H., 2013. Equine hoof slip distance during trot at training speed: comparison between kinematic and accelerometric measurement techniques. The Veterinary Journal 197: 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.004
-
Huson, H.J., Parker, H.G., Runstadler, J. and Ostrander, E.A., 2010. A genetic dissection of the breed composition and performance enhancement in the Alaskan sled dog. BMC Genetics 11: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-71
-
Huson, H.J., VonHoldt, B.M., Rimbault, M., Byers, A.M., Runstadler, J.A., Parker, H.G. and Ostrander, E.A., 2012. Breed-specific ancestry studies and genome-wide association analysis highlight an association between the MYH9 gene and heat tolerance in Alaskan spring racing sled dogs. Mammalian Genome 23: 178-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-011-9374-y
-
Iditarod, 2018. Race map. Available at: https://iditarod.com/race-map/
-
LaBelle, C.G., 2007a. Team members. Mush! Revised: a beginner’s manual of sled dog training, 4th edition. Barkleigh Productions, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA, pp. 6-7.
'Team members. Mush! Revised: a beginner’s manual of sled dog training, 4th edition ', () 6 -7.
-
LaBelle, C.G., 2007b. Lines. Mush! Revised: a beginner’s manual of sled dog training, 4th edition. Barkleigh Productions, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA, pp. 46-51.
'Lines. Mush! Revised: a beginner’s manual of sled dog training, 4th edition ', () 46 -51.
-
Lee, J.J., 2015. What makes a great sled dog? Breed, ambition, tough feet. National Geographic, Boone, IA, USA. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/y2ut4nmn
-
Lorke, M., Willen, M., Lucas, K., Beyerbach, M., Wefstaedt, P., Escobar, H.M. and Nolte, I., 2017. Comparative kinematic gait analysis in young and old beagle dogs. Journal of Veterinary Science 18: 521-530. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2017.18.4.521
-
Orantes-Gonzalez, E. and Heredia-Jimenez, J., 2017. Pulling a school trolley: a good kinematic option for children. Gait and Posture 53: 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.01.012
-
Ortega, F.Z., Sanchez, M.F., Garcia, R.F., Schyke, C.E.J. and Morales, L.Z., 2014. Predictors of scoliosis in school-aged children. Gaceta Medica de Mexico 150: 524-530.
'Predictors of scoliosis in school-aged children ' () 150 Gaceta Medica de Mexico : 524 -530.
-
Peham, C., Limbeck, S., Galla, K. and Bockstahler, B., 2013. Pressure distribution under three different types of harnesses used for guide dogs. The Veterinary Journal 198: e93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.040
-
Schwencke, M., Smolders, L.A., Bergknut, N., Gustas, P., Meij, B.P. and Hazewinkel, H.A., 2012. Soft tissue artifact in canine kinematic gait analysis. Veterinary Surgery 41: 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01021.x
-
Von Pfeil, D.J.F., Liska, W.D., Nelson, S., Mann, S. and Wakshlag, J.J., 2015. A survey on orthopedic injuries during a marathon sled dog race. Veterinary Medicine 6: 329-339. https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S88276
-
Wilderness Tour, 2018. Akaskero. Available at: https://akaskero.com/en/schlittenhundezentrum/wildnistour/
-
Yukon Quest, 2018a. Yukon quest distance chart. Available at: https://www.yukonquest.com/fr/node/374
-
Yukon Quest, 2018b. The modern sled dog. Available at: http://www.yukonquest.com/about/sled-dogs/modern-sled-dog
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 290 | 182 | 14 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 243 | 87 | 6 |
The effect of a traditional and a stick gang-line on the body position of working sled dogs
In: Comparative Exercise PhysiologySearch for other papers by F. Pittet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C.M. McGowan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H.K. Hyytiäinen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different gang-lines on the pulling angle of sled dogs. It was hypothesised that dogs would run with a straighter angle of pull (in relation to the main-line) in stick gang-lines (STICK) than they would do in traditional gang-lines (TRAD). Eight sled dogs, divided into two teams, ran a 3.1 km trail twice in both types of gang-lines, pulling a quadbike on dry ground. Each dog remained in its team in the same position (side of gang line, and forward or back in the line) for both runs, using both types of lines in randomised order between the runs. Markers were placed on the dogs and on the main lines, and the runs were recorded by a video camera. The dogs’ angle of pull measured from the video recordings was compared between the two conditions. Thirteen positional measurements for each dog during each run were taken. The dogs were used to running in TRAD and were not acclimatised to STICK. Data was analysed using Wilcoxon and Spearmans rho tests. Data regarding individual dogs (n=13), teams (n=52), dogs’ placements in teams (n=4), and gang-line related pulling angles (n=104) was analysed. Overall, the position of the dogs was straighter when pulling in STICK, than when pulling in TRAD, with a median of 19° (inter quartile range (IQR) 24.75°) and 32° (IQR 25.75°), respectively (P<0.001). Between the two teams, there was no significant difference in pulling positions when running in STICK (P=0.543), but there was in TRAD (P<0.001). In individual assessment, six of the eight dogs ran in a straighter position (P=0.003 to 0.046) in STICK. Dogs running in the front of both teams pulled significantly straighter when in STICK (21°; IQR 23.75) than in TRAD (median 39°; IQR 18; P<0.001).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 290 | 182 | 14 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 243 | 87 | 6 |
