Ethical Negotiations: Committees, Methods and Research with Children

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

This paper reflects on the ethical procedures encountered, and methodological strategies adopted, in order to develop and conduct qualitative research with children to explore their relationship to, and through, information and communication technologies (ICT). The study was conducted in Australia, which like many other nations, adopted a formal, mandatory institutional ethics framework historically formed in response to real and potential unethical and harmful research. This is now associated with a broader agenda of of risk-management and protection in universities which must be managed to enable the right of children to participate fully in research that affects them. Since calls for more multi-dimensional research with children and ICT have been made (Livingstone and Helsper, 2007; Livingstone, 2010), few academic studies have delved into the ethical processes and negotiations involved in such research, especially within academic institutions that are bounded by strict ethical and risk-management processes. This paper contributes to the growing field of appropriate research methods and methodologies, and their circumspection, for study with ICT connected-children, and adds to the growing debates around ethically including children in academic research.

Ethical Negotiations: Committees, Methods and Research with Children

in The International Journal of Children's Rights
Sections
References
  • AldersonP.Research by childrenInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology 4(2) (2001): 139153.

  • AldersonP. & MorrowV.Ethics Social Research and Consulting with Children and Young People (Tanner’s Lane: Barnardo’s2004).

  • BeazleyH. & EnnewJ.Participatory methods and approaches: tackling the two tyrannies’. In Doing Development Research. eds. DesaiV. & PotterR. (London: Sage 2997).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BellN.Ethics in child research: rights, reason and responsibilitiesChildren’s Geographies 6(1) (2008): 720.

  • CampbellA.For their own goodChildhood 15(1) (2008): 3049.

  • ChakrabortyK.The good muslim girl: Conducting qualitative participatory research to understand the lives of young Muslim women in the bustees of KolkataChildren’s Geographies 7(4) (2009): 421434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClarkA. & MossP.Listening to Young Children: The Mosaic Approach (London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ClarkA. & MossP.Spaces to Play: More Listening to Younger Children Using the Mosaic Approach (London: National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DarbyshireP.MacDougallC. & SchillerW.Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more?Qualitative Research 5(4) (2005): 417436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EnnewJ.The Right to be Properly Researched: How to do Rights-Based Scientific Research with Children (Bangkok: Knowing Children, Black on White Publications2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EnnewJ. & PlateauD.P.How to Research the Physical and Emotional Punishment of Children (Bangkok: International Save the Children Alliance2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FranceA.Young people’. In Doing Research with Children and Young People. eds. FraserS.LewisV.DingS.KelletM. & RobinsonC. (London: Sage2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GibbsL.GoldL.KulkensM. . ‘ Are the benefits of a community-based participatory approach to public health research worth the costs?Just Policy 47 (2008): 5259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HalseC. & HoneyA.Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourseQualitative Inquiry 13(3) (2007): 336352.

  • IsraelB.SchulzA.ParkerE. . ‘ Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public healthAnnual Review of Public Health 19 (1998): 173202.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IsraelB.A.SchulzA.J.ParkerE.A. . ‘ Community-based participatory research: Policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health researchEducation Health 14(2) (2001): 182197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JamesA.Learning to belong: The boundaries of adolescence’. In Symbolising Boundaries: Identity and Diversity in British Cultures. ed. Cohen (Manchester: Manchester University Press1986).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JamesA.JenksC. & ProutA.Theorizing Childhood (Cambridge: Polity Press1998).

  • KellettM.Children as Active Researchers: A New Research Paradigm for the 21st Century? (London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KrappmannL.The weight of the child’s view (Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child)’. International Journal of Children’s Rights 18(4) (2010): 501513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LivingstoneS.Youthful participation: what have we learned, what shall we ask next?’ In First Annual Digital Media and Learning Conference: Diversifying Participation (San Diego, La Jolla, California: University of California2010). (Unpublished) Accessed at: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/Experts/s.livingstone@lse.ac.uk.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LivingstoneS. & HelsperE.Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divideNew Media & Society 9(4) (2007): 671696.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacDougallC.Understanding 21st century childhood’. In Understanding Health (2nd Ed). eds. KeleherH. & MacDougallC. (Melbourne: Oxford University Press2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MeekV.L. & WoodF.The market as a new steering strategy for Australian higher educationHigher Education Policy 10(3–4) (1997): 253274.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NHMRCNational Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council2007). Accessed June 2011 at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/subjects/human.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PunchS.Multiple methods and research relations with young people in rural bolivia’. In Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers. eds. LimbM. & DwyerC. (London: Arnold2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PowellM.A. & SmithA.Children’s participation rights in researchChildhood 16(1) (2009): 124142.

  • RobsonB. & WisemanJ.MacroMelbourne: A Liveable City for All its People? (Melbourne: Melbourne Community Foundation2009a).

  • RobsonB. & WisemanJ.The MacroMelbourne Initiative: Social and Economic Disadvantage in Melbourne: Trends Challenges and Priorities for Philanthropic Investment (Melbourne: Melbourne Community Foundation2009b).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SkeltonT.Research with children and young people: exploring the tensions between ethics, competence and participationChildren’s Geographies 6(1) (2008): 2136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TierneyZ.B. & CorwinW.B.The tensions between academic freedom and institutional review boardsQualitative Inquiry 13(3) (2007): 388398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TilleyS.A. & GormleyL.Canadian university ethics review: Cultural complications translating principles into practiceQualitative Inquiry 13(3) (2007): 368387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNUNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child G.A. res. 44/25 annex 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167 U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (1989) entered into force September 2 1990. /C/93/Add.5 of 16 July 2003.

  • ValentineG.HollowayS. & BinghamN.The digital generation: Children, ICT and the everyday nature of social exclusionAntipode 34(2) (2002): 296315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VromenA.Australian young people’s participatory practices and internet useInformation Communication & Society 10(1) (2007): 4868.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • University of Melbourne Human Ethics Website accessed June 2011 at: http://www.research.unimelb.edu.au/humanethics/aboutapproval/whoapproves.

  • WarschauerM.Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide (Massachusetts: MIT Press2003).

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 56 53 2
Full Text Views 114 114 1
PDF Downloads 7 7 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0