A model of the origin of Kra-Dai tones

in Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

This paper finds origins for the three Kra-Dai tones in the segmental endings of Proto-Southern Austronesian, the parent language of Kra-Dai and Malayo-Polynesian. The Kra-Dai A category originates in sonorant endings (vowels, semi-vowels, nasals, liquids) and in Proto-Austronesian *-H2, reconstructed by Tsuchida (1976); the B category in *-R and in *-X, a hitherto not reconstructed ending reflected as -h in Amis and in the Bisayan language Aklanon; the C category, in Proto-Austronesian *-H1, reconstructed by Tsuchida. The tonal outcomes of *-s and *-S are described. Kra-Dai sonorant endings in tone C are argued to come from hypothetical Austronesian prototypes in which a sonorant ending was followed by *-s, a suffix of unknown function. Although the present model does not require Kra-Dai to be a daughter of Proto-Austronesian, the building blocks for Kra-Dai tones are shown to be in place during the Formosan phase of Austronesian phonological history.

Sections
References
  • Adelaar Alexander. 2011. Siraya: Retrieving the phonology grammar and lexicon of a dormant Formosan language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

  • Benedict Paul K. 1942. Thai Kadai and Indonesian: A new alignment in Southeastern Asia. American Anthropologist 44(4). 576–601.

  • Benedict Paul K. 1975. Austro-Thai language and culture with a glossary of roots. New Haven: HRAF Press.

  • Blust Robert. 2009. The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies.

  • Blust Robert. 2018. The “mystery aspirates” in Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 57(1). 221–247.

  • Blust Robert & Trussell Stephen. 2010. Austronesian comparative dictionary: Web edition. http://www.trussel2.com/acd/ (12 May 2018).

  • Dempwolff Otto. 1934. Vergleichende Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes. Vol. 1. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.

  • Dempwolff Otto. 1938. Vergleichende Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes. Vol. 3. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.

  • Egerod Søren. 1980. Atayal-English dictionary. London: Curzon Press.

  • Ferlus Michel. 1996. Remarques sur le consonantisme du proto kam-sui. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 25(2). 235–278.

  • Ferrell Raleigh. 1969. Taiwan aboriginal groups: Problems in cultural and linguistic classification (Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology 1). Taipei: Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica.

  • Gedney William J. 1986. Speculations on early Tai tones. In John McCoy & Timothy Light (eds.) Contributions to Sino-Tibetan studies 144–156. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

  • Greenhill Simon Blust Robert & Gray Russell. 2003. Austronesian basic vocabulary database. https://abvd.shh.mpg.de/austronesian/ (8 April 2019).

  • Haudricourt André-Georges. 1954a. De l’ origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242. 69–82.

  • Haudricourt André-Georges. 1954b. Comment reconstruire le chinois archaïque. Word 10(2–3). 351–364.

  • Haudricourt André-Georges. 1975. À propos du puzzle de W.J. Gedney. In Jimmy G. Harris & James R. Chamberlain (eds.) Studies in Tai linguistics in honour of W.J. Gedney 257–258. Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language.

  • Lǐ Jǐnfāng (李锦芳). 1999. Bùyāngyǔ yánjiū (布央语研究). Beijing: Zhōngyāng Mínzú Dàxué Chūbǎnshè.

  • Li Paul Jen-kuei. 1988. A comparative study of Bunun dialects. In Selected papers on Formosan languages 743–766. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Li Paul Jen-kuei. 2004a. Basic vocabulary for Formosan languages and dialects. In Selected papers on Formosan languages vol. 2 1483–1530. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Li Paul Jen-kuei. 2004b. Reconstruction of Proto-Atayalic phonology. In Selected Papers on Formosan Languages vol. 1 625–692. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Li Paul Jen-kuei. 2004c. Men’s and women’s speech in Mayrinax. In Selected papers on Formosan languages vol. 2 1045–1053. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Li Paul Jen-kuei & Tsuchida Shigeru. 2001. Pazih dictionary (Language and Linguistics Monograph A2). Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Mei Tsu-lin. 1970. Tones and prosody in Middle Chinese and the origin of the Rising tone. Harvard Journal of Asian Studies 30. 86–110.

  • Namoh Rata. 2013. O pidafo’an to sowal misanopangcah. Taipei: Nántiān Shūjú.

  • Norquest Peter. 2013. A revised inventory of Proto Austronesian consonants: Kra-Dai and Austroasiatic evidence. Mon-Khmer Studies 42. 102–126.

  • Norquest Peter. 2015. A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Hlai. Leiden: Brill.

  • Ostapirat Weera. 2000. Proto-Kra. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(1). 1–251.

  • Ostapirat Weera. 2004. Proto-Hlai sound system and lexicons. In Ying-ching Lin Fang-min Hsu Chun-chih Lee Jackson T.S. Sun Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.) Studies in Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday 121–175. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics Academia Sinica.

  • Ostapirat Weera. 2005. Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Putting together archaeology linguistics and genetics. In Laurent Sagart Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.) The peopling of East Asia 109–133. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

  • Pecoraro Ferdinando. 1977. Essai de dictionnaire taroko-français. Paris: SECMI.

  • Pittayaporn Pittayawat. 2009. The phonology of Proto-Tai. Ithaca: Cornell University PhD thesis.

  • Pulleyblank Edwin. 1962. The consonantal system of Old Chinese part 2. Asia Major 9. 206–265.

  • Reid Lawrence A. 1971. Philippine minor languages: Word lists and phonologies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

  • Sagart Laurent. 1999. The origin of Chinese tones. In Shigeki Kaji (ed.) Cross-linguistic studies of tonal phenomena tonogenesis typology and related topics 91–103. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2004. The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics 43(2). 411–444.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2005. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. In Laurent Sagart Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.) The peopling of East Asia: Putting together Archaeology Linguistics and Genetics 161–176. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2008. The expansion of setaria farmers in East Asia: A linguistic and archaeological model. In Alicia Sanchez-Mazas Roger Blench Malcolm Ross Ilya Peiros & Marie Lin (eds.) Past human migrations in East Asia: Matching archaeology linguistics and genetics (Routledge Studies in the Early History of Asia 5) 133–157. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2016. The wider connections of Austronesian: A response to Blust (2009). Diachronica 33(2). 255–281.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2017a. The origins of Kra-Dai tones current status (I): Tone C. https://stan.hypotheses.org/123.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2017b. The origins of Kra-Dai tones current status (II): Tone B. https://stan.hypotheses.org/120.

  • Sagart Laurent. 2017c. The origins of Kra-Dai tones current status (III): Tone A. https://stan.hypotheses.org/117.

  • Salas Reyes Vicente Zorc R. David & Prado Nicolas L. 1969. A study of the Aklanon dialect volume 2: Dictionary. Washington DC: Peace Corps.

  • Shorto Harry. 2006. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. (Ed.) Paul Sidwell Doug Cooper & Christian Bauer. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

  • Sneddon James N. 1984. Proto-Sangiric and the Sangiric languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.

  • Theraphan L. Thongkum. 1992. A preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Lakkja (Cha Shan Yao). Mon-Khmer Studies 20. 57–89.

  • Thurgood Graham. 1989. Notes on the reconstruction of Proto-Kam-Sui. In Jerold Edmondson & David Solnit (eds.) Comparative Kadai: Linguistic studies beyond Tai 179–218. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.

  • Tsuchida Shigeru. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology (Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series 5). Tokyo: ILCAA.

  • Vovin Alexander. 2018. Proto-K(r)adai “hand” “eye” and “bird” revisited. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 47(1). 150–164.

  • Wolff John U. 2010. Proto-Austronesian phonology with glossary. 2 vols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Zorc R. David. 1995. A glossary of Austronesian reconstructions: An introduction to Austronesian studies. In Darrell T. Tryon (ed.) Comparative Austronesian dictionary vol. 1 fascicle 2 1106–1197. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Figures
  • View in gallery
    Figure 1

    Austronesian phylogeny showing the Puluqish clade (box)

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 320 320 230
Full Text Views 14 14 3
PDF Downloads 17 17 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0