A Different Legal Conservatism

In: Contemporary Pragmatism
View More View Less
  • 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Virginia Tech, USA, luke.plotica@vt.edu

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In Conservatism and Pragmatism, Seth Vannatta posits and explores several major conceptual and practical affinities between classical (especially Peircean) pragmatism and conservatism. Characterizing both as essentially methods rather than ideologies, he argues that the two ought to be understood as mutually supportive and corrective, and that they conjointly supply an especially robust set of intellectual resources relevant to contemporary moral, political, and legal concerns. This essay critically examines Vannatta’s marriage of conservatism and pragmatism in the realm of legal theory. It argues that while Vannatta’s work provides a rigorous pragmatist alternative to the familiar legal formalism adopted by many American conservatives, its foundations may be narrower than Vannatta appreciates and the resulting theory may have little necessary connection to the dispositional, methodological conservatism upon which it is purportedly based.

  • Calabresi Steven G. , ed. 2007. Originalism: A Quarter Century of Debate. Washington, DC : Regnery Press.

  • Holmes Oliver Wendell Jr. 1992. The Essential Holmes, ed. Posner Richard A. . Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.

  • Holmes Oliver Wendell Jr. 1997. “The Path of Law.” Harvard Law Review 110(5): 9911009.

  • James William . 1987. Pragmatism in Writings, 1902–1910, ed. Kuklick Bruce . New York, NY : Library of America, pp. 479624.

  • Leiter Brian . 2010. “Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue?.” Legal Theory 16: 11133.

  • Oakeshott Michael . 1991. Rationalism in politics and other essays, 2nd Ed. Indianapolis, IN : Liberty Fund.

  • Posner Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

  • Posner Richard A. 2006. Not a Suicide Pact: the Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.

  • Scalia Antonin . 1989. “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 56(4): 117588.

  • Schauer Frederick . 1988. “Formalism.” Yale Law Journal 97(4): 50948.

  • Schauer Frederick . 1991. Playing by the Rules: a Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision Making in Law and in Life. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sunstein Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press).

  • Sunstein Cass R. 2009. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn’t Mean What it Meant Before (Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vannatta Seth . 2014. Conservatism and Pragmatism in Law, Politics, and Ethics (New York, NY : Palgrave Macmillan).

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 129 36 3
Full Text Views 21 3 0
PDF Views & Downloads 11 2 0