Pragmatist Egalitarianism Revisited: Some Replies to my Critics

In: Contemporary Pragmatism
Author: David Rondel1
View More View Less

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In this article, I reply to some criticisms of my book, Pragmatist Egalitarianism, offered by professors Robert Talisse, Susan Dieleman, and Alexander Livingston. Some of the major themes and questions I address include the following: How are conflicts between different egalitarian ideals best understood and addressed? Does the quest for equality have a fundamental locus, or are the different egalitarian variables I identify in the book, conceptually speaking, on an equal footing? What is the relationship between justice and equality? How are feminist egalitarianism and Marxian egalitarianism best slotted into my distinction between “vertical” and “horizontal” egalitarianism? What does liberalism, problematic though it may sometimes be, have to contribute to the egalitarian project?

  • Cohen G.A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Mills Charles . 2017. “The Critique of Racial Liberalism: An Interview with Charles W. Mills.” Roberts Neil . Black Perspectives. April 3, 2017. At -racial-liberalism-an-interview-with-charles-w-mills/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rondel David . 2018. Pragmatist Egalitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rorty Richard . 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rorty Richard . 1998. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin.

  • Walzer Michael . 2004. Politics and Passion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 211 109 10
Full Text Views 9 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 10 5 0