Kant, the Practical Postulates, and Clifford’s Principle

In: Contemporary Pragmatism
Author: Samuel Kahn1
View More View Less

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

In this paper I argue that Kant would have endorsed Clifford’s principle. The paper is divided into four sections. In the first, I review Kant’s argument for the practical postulates. In the second, I discuss a traditional objection to the style of argument Kant employs. In the third, I explain how Kant would respond to this objection and how this renders the practical postulates consistent with Clifford’s principle. In the fourth, I introduce positive grounds for thinking that Kant would have endorsed this principle.

  • Adickes Erich . 1920. Kants Opus postumum dargestellt und beurteilt. Reuther and Reichard.

  • Chignell Andrew . 2007. “Belief in Kant.” The Philosophical Review 116.3: 323360.

  • Chignell Andrew . 2016. “The Ethics of Belief.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), url = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-belief/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allison Henry . 1990. Kant’s theory of freedom. Cambridge University Press.

  • Ameriks Karl . 2000. Kant’s theory of mind. 2nd edition, Oxford University Press.

  • Chituc Vladimir et al.2016. “Blame, not ability, impacts moral “ought” judgments for impossible actions.” Cognition 150: 2025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chuard Philippe and Southwood Nicholas . 2009. “Epistemic norms without voluntary control.” Noûs 43.4: 599632.

  • Feldman Richard . 2001. “Voluntary belief and epistemic evaluation.” In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue (ed. Matthias Steup). Oxford University Press: 7792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham Peter . 2011. “Ought and ability.” The Philosophical Review 120.3: 337382.

  • Greene Thomas and Silber John . 1960. “Preface to the second edition of this translation.” In Kant Immanuel , Religion within the limits of Reason alone (trans. Theodore Greene and Hoyt Hudson). First Harper Torchbook: cxxxixcxlii.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greene Theodore . 1960. “The historical context and religious significance of Kant’s Religion.” In Kant Immanuel , Religion within the limits of Reason alone (trans. Theodore Greene and Hoyt Hudson). First Harper Torchbook: ixlxxviii.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guyer Paul . 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.

  • Johnson Robert and Cureton Adam . 2017. “Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming url = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/kant-moral/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kahn Samuel . 2015. “Is the Final Chapter of the Metaphysics of morals also the Final Chapter of the Practical Postulates?American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89.2: 309332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kahn Samuel . 2019. Kant, Ought Implies Can, the Principle of Alternate Possibilities, and Happiness. Lexington Press.

  • Martin Wayne . 2009. “Ought but cannot,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 109: 103128.

  • Pace Michael . 2011. “The Epistemic Value of Moral Considerations.” Noûs 45.2: 239268.

  • Pigden Charles . 1990. “Ought Implies Can.” Sophia 29.1: 230.

  • Reath Andrews . 1988. “Two conceptions of the highest good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26.4: 593619.

  • Ryan Sharon . 2003. “Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief.” Philosophical Studies 114.5: 4779.

  • Sayre-McCord Geoffrey . 1996. “Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory.” In Moral Knowledge? New Readings in Moral Epistemology (eds. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Mark Timmons ). Oxford University Press: 137189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schrader George . 1951. “Kant’s Presumed Repudiation of the “Moral Argument” in the “Opus Postumum”.” Philosophy 26.98: 228241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silber John . 1960. “The ethical significance of Kant’s Religion.” In Kant Immanuel , Religion within the limits of Reason alone (trans. Theodore Greene and Hoyt Hudson). First Harper Torchbook: lxxixcxxxiv.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steup Matthias . 2000. “Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology.” Acta Analytica 15.24: 2556.

  • Steup Matthias (ed.). 2001. Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Oxford University Press.

  • Tolley Clinton . 2006. “Kant on the Nature of Logical Laws.” Philosophical Topics 34.5: 371407.

  • Vranas Peter . 2007. “I ought, therefore I can.” Philosophical Studies 136.2: 167216.

  • Wood Allen .1970. Kant’s Moral Religion. Cornell University Press.

  • Wood Allen . 1978. Kant’s Rational Theology. Cornell University Press.

  • Wood Allen . 2007. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 181 125 6
Full Text Views 10 8 0
PDF Views & Downloads 14 10 1