Political Competition in Sweden 1976-2014

A Comparative Analysis at the Local Level

In: Comparative Sociology

The main purpose of this study is to examine political competition on the local level in Sweden and to empirically test two theories of political competition, namely whether the size of the unit affects the variation in political competition and whether socioeconomic standards affect the variation in political competition. The findings support the suggested causal mechanism between socioeconomic standards and competition. Accordingly, units with higher socioeconomic standards have a higher level of political competition. Some empirical findings also support the suggested causal mechanism between the size of the units and the political competition. The findings show that population size is a robust determinant of competition and that a larger population size affects competition positively. The findings show also that area size is a relatively robust determinant of competition and that area size has a negative effect on competition. However the negative effect is contrary to the expectations.

  • AchenC. H. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables 2000 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association July 2000 UCLA Ann Arbor

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AistrupJ. A. State legislative party competition: A county-level measure Political Research Quarterly 1993 46 2 433 446

  • AistrupJ. A. Constituency diversity and party competition: A county and state level analysis Political Research Quarterly 2004 57 2 267 281

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AltmanD.Pérez-LiñánA. Assessing the quality of democracy: Freedom, competitiveness and participation in eighteen Latin American countries Democratization 2002 9 2 85 100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnckarC. Storlek och partisystem: en studie av 77 stater 1998 Åbo Åbo Akademis Förlag

  • AnckarC. Size, islandness, and democracy: A global comparison International political science review 2008 29 4 433 459

  • AnckarD. Homogeneity and smallness: Dahl and Tufte revisited Scandinavian Political Studies 1999 22 1 29 44

  • BartoliniS. Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part i Journal of Theoretical Politics 1999 11 4 435 470

  • BartoliniS. Collusion, Competition and Democracy Part ii Journal of Theoretical Politics 2000 12 1 33 65

  • BeckN. Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 2001 4 1 271 293

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeckN.KatzJ. N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data American Political Science Review 1995 634 647

  • BeckN.KatzJ. N. Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models Political Analysis 1996 6 1 1 36

  • BeckN.KatzJ. N. Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data Annual Review of Political Science 2011 14 331 352

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BäckH. Explaining coalitions: evidence and lessons from studying coalition formation in Swedish local government 2003 Uppsala University

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BäckH.HadeniusA. Democracy and State Capacity: Exploring a J‐Shaped Relationship Governance 2008 21 1 1 24

  • CasstevensT. W.PressC. The context of democratic competition in American state politics American Journal of Sociology 1963 536 543

  • DahlR. A. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition 1971 New Haven, CT Yale University Press

  • DahlR. A. Democracy and its Critics 1989 New Haven and London Yale University Press

  • DahlR. A.TufteE. R. Size and democracy 1973 Stanford University Press

  • DawsonR. E.RobinsonJ. A. Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states The Journal of Politics 1963 25 2 265 289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DenkT. Size and Political Support on the Local Level in Sweden Local Government Studies 2012 38 6 777 793

  • DiamondL. DiamondL.PlatterM. F. Three Paradoxes of Democracy The Global Resurgence of Democracy 1996 Baltimore and London Johns Hopkins University Press 111 123

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DownsA. An economic theory of political action in a democracy The Journal of Political Economy 1957 135 150

  • DyeT. R. Politics, economics, and the public: policy outcomes in the American states 1966 Chicago Rand McNally & Company

  • FoxJ. Regression diagnostics 1991 Thousand Oaks SAGE Publications

  • FranklinM. N. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945 2004 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GerringJ.PalmerM.TeorellJ.ZareckiD. Demography and democracy: A global, district-level analysis of electoral contestation American Political Science Review 2015 109 3 574 591

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HillK. Q. Democracy in the fifty states 1994 Lincoln and London University of Nebraska Press

  • HögströmJ. Quality of Democracy Around the Globe: A Comparative Study 2013 Östersund, Sweden Mid Sweden University Doctoral Thesis

  • HögströmJ. Democracies in crisis Contemporary Politics 2014 20 4 402 420

  • KarlssonD. A Democracy of Scale. Size and Representative Democracy in Swedish Local Government Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 2013 17 1 7 28

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KeeleL.KellyN. J. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables Political Analysis 2006 14 2 186 205

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KingG.KeohaneR. O.VerbaS. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994 Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KittelB. Sense and sensitivity in pooled analysis of political data European Journal of Political Research 1999 35 2 225 253

  • KittelB.WinnerH. How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization‐welfare state nexus revisited European Journal of Political Research 2005 44 2 269 293

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LarsenC. A. Municipal size and democracy: a critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark Scandinavian Political Studies 2002 25 4 317 332

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LassenD. D.SerritzlewS. Jurisdiction size and local democracy: evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform American Political Science Review 2011 105 2 238 258

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MoraskiB. J.ReisingerW. M. Explaining electoral competition across Russia’s regions Slavic Review 2003 278 301

  • MorehouseS. M. State politics, parties and policy 1981 New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston

  • NewtonK. Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness, and democracy in local government Political Studies 1982 30 2 190 206

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PintoP. M.TimmonsJ. F. The Political Determinants of Economic Performance Political Competition and the Sources of Growth Comparative Political Studies 2005 38 1 26 50

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PlümperT.TroegerV. E.ManowP. Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory European Journal of Political Research 2005 44 2 327 354

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReuvenyR.LiQ. Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality An Empirical Analysis Comparative Political Studies 2003 36 5 575 601

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Statistics Sweden 2016 Last accessed June 30, 2016 From www.scb.se

  • StrømK. Inter-party competition in advanced democracies Journal of Theoretical Politics 1989 1 3 277 300

  • StrømK. Democracy as political competition American Behavioral Scientist 1992 35 4-5 375 396

  • TeuneH.PrzeworskiA. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry 1970 Malabar, Florida Krieger Publishing Company

  • TrippA. M.KangA. The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation Comparative Political Studies 2008 41 3 338 361

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VanhanenT. Prospects of democracy: A study of 172 countries 1997 London and New York Routledge

  • VanhanenT. A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810-1998 Journal of Peace Research 2000 37 2 251 265

  • VanhanenT. Democratization: A comparative analysis of 170 countries 2003 London and New York Routledge

  • WrightJ. Political competition and democratic stability in new democracies British journal of political science 2008 38 2 221 245

  • 3

    See also Downs (1957).

  • 14

    In model 1, the five cases Kiruna (1994), Kiruna (2002), Stockholm (2006), Gällivarie (1998), and Gällivarie (2002) have a Cook’s value of over .010. In model 2, the four cases Stockholm (2006), Stockholm (2010), Vellinge (2006), and Kiruna (2002) have a Cook’s value of over .010. In model 3, the seven cases Kiruna (1994), Stockholm (2006), Gällivarie (1998), Jokkmokk (1998), Gällivarie (2006), Arjeplog (2014), and Vaxholm (2006) have a Cook’s value of over .010.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 134 94 0
Full Text Views 178 8 1
PDF Downloads 14 5 0