Comparing Contextualism and Invariantism on the Correctness of Contextualist Intuitions

in Grazer Philosophische Studien
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Contextualism is motivated by cases in which the intuitive correctness of a range of phenomena, including knowledge attributions, assertions and reasoning, depends on the attributor's context. Contextualists offer a charitable understanding of these intuitions, interpreting them as reflecting the truth value of the knowledge attributions and the appropriateness of the relevant assertions and reasoning. Here, I investigate a range of different invariantist accounts and examine the extent to which they too can offer a charitable account of the contextualist data

Comparing Contextualism and Invariantism on the Correctness of Contextualist Intuitions

in Grazer Philosophische Studien

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 4
Full Text Views 79 79 38
PDF Downloads 13 13 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0