Musical Perdurantism and the Problem of Intermittent Existence

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien

Recently, a number of philosophers have defended a novel, materialist view on the nature of musical works—musical perdurantism. According to this view, musical works are a peculiar kind of concreta, namely perduring mereological sums of performances and/or other concrete entities. One problem facing musical perdurantism stems from the thought that if this view is correct, then virtually no musical work can exist in a continuous, non-intermittent fashion. The aim of this paper is to expound this problem and show that it cannot be plausibly solved by a musical perdurantist.

  • AlwardPeter 2004. “The Spoken Work.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62, 331–337.

  • Aristotle 1995. Aristotle’s Physics: A Guided Study. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press.

  • CaplanBen and MathesonCarl 2004. “Can a Musical Work Be Created?” British Journal of Aesthetics 44, 113–134.

  • CaplanBen and MathesonCarl 2006. “Defending Musical Perdurantism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 46, 59–69.

  • CaplanBen and MathesonCarl 2008. “Defending ‘Defending Musical Perdurantism.’” British Journal of Aesthetics 48, 80–85.

  • CurrieGregory 1989. An Ontology of Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • DaviesDavid 2004. Art as Performance. Blackwell Publishing.

  • DaviesStephen 2001. Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • DoddJulian 2000. “Musical Works as Eternal Types.” British Journal of Aesthetics 40, 424–440.

  • DoddJulian 2004. “Types, Continuants, and the Ontology of Music.” British Journal of Aesthetics 44, 342–360.

  • DoddJulian 2012. “Defending the Discovery Model in the Ontology of Art: A Reply to Amie Thomasson on the Qua Problem.” British Journal of Aesthetics 52, 75–95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoodmanNelson 1968. Languages of Art. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

  • HawleyKatherine 2010. “Temporal Parts.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. url = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/temporal-parts/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HazlettAllan 2013. “Against Repeatable Artworks.” In: Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy Mag Uidhir, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaniaAndrew 2008. “The Methodology of Musical Ontology: Descriptivism and its Implications.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48, 426–444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KaniaAndrew 2010. “The Philosophy of Music.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. url = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/music/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KleinschmidtShieva and RossJacob 2012. “Repeatable Artwork Sentences and Generics.” In: Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy Mag Uidhir, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KivyPeter 1983. “Platonism in Music.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 19, 109–129.

  • LevinsonJerrold 1980. “What a Musical Work Is.” Journal of Philosophy 77, 5–28.

  • LewisDavid 1983. Philosophical Papers: Volume 1. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Mag Uidhir, Christy 2013. Art and Art-Attempts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • QuineW. V. O. 1948. “On What There Is.” Review of Metaphysics 2, 21–38.

  • RohrbaughGuy 2003. “Artworks as Historical Individuals.” European Journal of Philosophy 11, 177–211.

  • RohrbaughGuy 2013. “Must Ontological Pragmatism Be Self-Defeating?” In: Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy Mag Uidhir, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RossbergMarcus 2013. “Destroying Artworks.” In: Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Christy

  • UidhirMag, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–83.

  • SteckerRobert 2009. “Methodological Questions about the Ontology of Music.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67, 375–386.

  • TillmanChris 2011. “Musical Materialism.” British Journal of Aesthetics 51, 13–29.

  • TillmanChris and SpencerJoshua 2012. “Musical Perdurantism and the Inheritance Problem.” Analysis 72, 252–259.

  • ThomassonAmie 2004. “The Ontology of Art.” In: The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, edited by Peter Kivy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 78–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThomassonAmie 2005. “The Ontology of Art and Knowledge in Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63, 221–229.

  • VarziAchille 2015. “Mereology.” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. url = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/mereology/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WollheimRichard 1968. Art and its Objects. New York: Harper & Row.

  • WolterstorffNicholas 1975. “Toward an Ontology of Art Works.” Noûs 9, 115–142.

  • ZemachEddy 1966. “The Ontological Status of Art Objects.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25, 145–153.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 127 105 8
Full Text Views 173 157 0
PDF Downloads 17 13 0