Karl Radek (1885–1939) by Jean-François Fayet

In: Historical Materialism
Author: Ian Birchall
View More View Less

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 2

    Lenin 1965, p. 69.

  • 5

    Lerner 1970, p. 115. His claim that John Reed died of disillusion at the Baku Congress rather than of the diagnosed typhus (p. 104) is pure fantasy. Lerner’s book was published by Stanford University Press which, in the post-McCarthy period, produced such important studies as Robert Wohl’s history of the early years of the French Communist Party and John M Cammett’s study of Gramsci (Wohl 1966; Cammett 1967). Though the research was doubtless encouraged for Cold- War purposes, this was measured work committed to the principle of knowing the enemy. It is hard to imagine the USA of today producing such intelligent work on the history of Islam.

  • 6

    Tuck 1988, pp. 62, 113.

  • 7

    Nettl 1966, p. 471.

  • 9

    See also Nettl 1966, II, pp. 569–74, 586–8.

  • 10

    Lenin 1966, p. 335. It is a pity this letter was not made available at the time of the Algerian War to the French soldiers who were told by the French Communist Party that they were in breach of their ‘Leninist’ obligations if they deserted or evaded conscription.

  • 12

    Rosmer 1987, p. 70.

  • 13

    Serge 2001, p. 611.

  • 15

    Rosmer 1987, pp. 87, 122.

  • 16

    Carr 1986, p. 32.

  • 17

    Richardson 1995, pp. 19, 76.

  • 21

    Broué 2005, p. 550.

  • 22

    Radek 1923.

  • 24

    Cliff 1979, pp. 168–72. For a critique of Cliff’s position which still sees the Schlageter speech as an ‘error’, see Harman 1982, pp. 253–4.

  • 25

    Broué 2005, p. 730.

  • 27

    Broué 2005, p. 725.

  • 28

    Broué 2005, p. 726.

  • 29

    Cliff 1979, p. 169.

  • 30

    It was Zinoviev who, in 1924, first invented the position, made notorious by Stalin in the early 1930s, that social democracy had now ‘become merely a wing of fascism’ (p. 501). Anyone who advocated such an inanity clearly could have no grasp of either the united front or the problem of fascism.

  • 31

    Rosmer 1987, p. 207.

  • 32

    Broué 2005, p. 728.

  • 33

    For a contemporary account see Serge 2000, pp. 77–81.

  • 36

    Serge 2000, p. 127.

  • 37

    Rosmer 1987, pp. 222–6. At the time Rosmer wrote a vigorous defence of Radek, sharply criticising his Social-Democratic critics. Rosmer 2000.

  • 38

    Lenin 1964, p. 63.

  • 39

    Retzlaw 1972, p. 258. I am grateful to Einde O’Callaghan for this reference.

  • 40

    Broué 2005, pp. 889–98.

  • 41

    Trotsky 1946, p. 376.

  • 43

    Retzlaw 1972, p. 358.

  • 44

    See Marie 2001, pp. 597–606.

  • 45

    Gorky et al. 1977, pp. 153, 151.

  • 46

    Joyce 1934. When I was a schoolboy, it was commonly rumoured that the best (i.e. most salacious) bit of Ulysses was the last forty pages and that we should turn directly to them. Apparently, Radek had done the same.

  • 48

    See Serge 2004.

  • 49

    Radek 1935, p. 34.

  • 51

    Broué 1964, pp. 213–14.

  • 53

    Collard 1937, p. 78.

  • 54

    Serge 2001, p. 489.

  • 55

    As predicted by Serge 2001, p. 778.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 126 53 5
Full Text Views 98 10 1
PDF Downloads 43 17 0