Lineages of Capital

in Historical Materialism
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Banaji’s essays offer a powerful plea for a renewal of Marxism, a passionate argument to emancipate Marxism from the dead weight of vulgar traditions – with their simplifications, forced abstractions, mechanical reductions, generalised a-historical theorising, and familiar teleologies. To reinvigorate Marxism, argues Banaji, it is essential to use theory creatively, and recognise the need for complexity in thinking about categories. We cannot generalise about modes of production simply by referring to the forms of labour exploitation in the abstract: associate serfdom or coerced labour with feudalism, and free wage-labour with capitalism. Without historical research into the specific ways in which each economy works – its history and logic of operation – we cannot in the abstract characterise a mode of production: we only end up producing a formal evolutionary sequence of modes. Agreeing with the general thrust of the critique mounted in the book, this essay suggests that Banaji’s own arguments often reproduce the binaries and linearities he opposes, and remain framed within certain forms of reductionism.

Lineages of Capital

in Historical Materialism

Sections

References

  • AndersonPerry Arguments within English Marxism 1980 London Verso

  • BalbusIsaac D. ‘Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the “Relative Autonomy” of Law’ Law and Society Review 1977 11 3 571 588

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BanajiJairus ‘For a Theory of Colonial Modes of Production’ Economic and Political Weekly 1972 7 52 2498 2502

  • BanajiJairus ‘Mode of Production in Indian Agriculture: A Comment’ Economic and Political Weekly 1973 8 14 679 683

  • BanajiJairus ‘India and the Colonial Mode of Production: Comment’ Economic and Political Weekly 1975 10 49 1887 1889 1891 1892

  • BanajiJairus ‘The Peasantry in the Feudal Mode of Production: Towards an Economic Model’ Journal of Peasant Studies 1976a 3 3 299 320

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BanajiJairus ‘Chayanov, Kautsky, Lenin: Considerations towards a Synthesis’ Economic and Political Weekly 1976b 11 40 1594 1607

  • BanajiJairus ‘Capitalist Domination and the Small Peasantry: Deccan Districts in the Late-Nineteenth Century’ Economic and Political Weekly 1977a 12 33/34 [Special Number] 1375 1377 1379 1381 1383 1385 1387 1389 1391 1393 1398 1400 1401 1403 1404

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BanajiJairus ‘Modes of Production in a Materialist Conception of History’ Capital and Class 1977b 1 3 1 44

  • BanajiJairus Agrarian Change in Late Antiquity: Gold Labour and Aristocratic Dominance 2001 Oxford Oxford University Press

  • BanajiJairus Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation 2010 Leiden Brill Historical Materialism Book Series

  • BandyopadhyayD. ‘Tebhaga Movement in Bengal: A Retrospect’ Economic and Political Weekly 2001 36 41 3901 3903 3905 3907

  • BardhanPranabRudraAshok ‘Terms and Conditions of Sharecropping Contracts: An Analysis of Village Survey Data in India’ Journal of Development Studies 1980 16 3 287 302

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bengal Land Revenue Commission Report of the Land Revenue Commission Bengal with Minutes of Dissent 1940a Volume 1 Alipore Bengal Government Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bengal Land Revenue Commission Report of the Land Revenue Commission Bengal with Minutes of Dissent 1940b Volume 2 Alipore Bengal Government Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BhaduriAmit ‘Cropsharing as a Labour Process: Size of Farm and Supervision Cost’ Journal of Peasant Studies 1983 10 2/3 88 93

  • BhattacharyaNeeladri ‘The Logic of Tenancy Cultivation: Central and Southeast Punjab, 1870–1935’ The Indian Economic and Social History Review 1983 20 2 121 170

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BoseSugata Agrarian Bengal: Economy Social Structure and Politics 1919–1947 1986 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

  • BoseSugata Peasant Labour and Colonial Capital: Rural Bengal since 1770 1993 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

  • BremanJan Patronage and Exploitation: Changing Agrarian Relations in South Gujarat India 1979 New Delhi Manohar

  • BrownWendyHalleyJanet E. Left Legalism/Left Critique 2002 Durham, NC. Duke University Press

  • BurkePeter ‘Strengths and Weaknesses of the History of Mentalities’ History of European Ideas 1986 7 5 439 451

  • BurkePeter The French Historical Revolution: The ‘Annales’ School 1929–89 1990 Cambridge Polity Press

  • ChartierRoger Cultural History: Between Practices and Representations 1988 Cambridge Polity Press

  • ChatterjeePartha ‘Colonial State and Peasant Resistance in Bengal: 1920–1947’ Past and Present 1986 110 169 204

  • Critical Legal Studies Symposium Stanford Law Review 1984 36 1/2

  • DasguptaBiplab ‘Sharecropping in West Bengal during the Colonial Period’ Economic and Political Weekly Review of Agriculture 1984 19 26 A85 A87 A89 A96

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de CerteauMichel RendallSteven The Practice of Everyday Life 1988 [1980] Berkeley University of California Press

  • FreemanAlan D. ‘Truth and Mystification in Legal Scholarship’ Yale Law Journal 1981 90 5 1229 1237

  • GabelPeterFeinmanJay KairysDavid ‘Contract Law as Ideology’ The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique 1998 New York Basic Books

  • JohnsonRichard ‘Edward Thompson, Eugene Genovese and Socialist-Humanist History’ History Workshop Journal 1978 6 79 100

  • KayeHarvey J. McClellandKeith E.P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives 1990 Cambridge Polity Press

  • KennedyDuncan ‘The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries’ Buffalo Law Review 1979 28 211 381

  • KennedyDuncan ‘The Role of Law in Economic Thought: Essays on the Fetishism of Commodities’ The American University Law Review 1985 Volume 34

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KennedyDuncan A Critique of Adjudication 1998 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press

  • KennedyDuncan BrownHalley ‘Critique of Rights in Critical Legal Studies’ 2002 2002

  • KulaWitold GarnerLawrence An Economic Theory of the Feudal System: Towards a Model of the Polish Economy 1500–1800 1976 London New Left Books

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LaCapraDominick ‘Is Everyone a Mentalité Case? Transference and the “Culture” Concept’ History and Theory 1985 23 3 296 311

  • Martinez-AlierJuan Landowners and Labourers in Southern Spain 1971 London Allen and Unwin

  • Martinez-AlierJuan Hacienda Plantations and Collective Farms: Agrarian Class Societies – Cuba and Peru 1977 London Frank Cass

  • Martinez-AlierJuan DuncanKennethRutledgeIanHardingColin ‘Relations of Production in Andean Haciendas: Peru’ Land and Labour in Latin America: Essays on the Development of Agrarian Capitalism in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries 1978 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarxKarl MooreSamuelAvelingEdward Capital Volume I 1971 [1887] Moscow Progress Publishers

  • MenschElizabeth V. ‘The Colonial Origins of Liberal Property Rights’ Buffalo Law Review 1982 31 635 735

  • PatnaikUtsa Agrarian Relations and Accumulation: The ‘Mode of Production’ Debate in India 1990 New Delhi Oxford University Press

  • PrakashGyan Bonded Histories: Genealogies of Labor Servitude in Colonial India 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

  • PrakashGyan The World of the Rural Labourer in Colonial India 1994 New Delhi Oxford University Press

  • RancièreJacques DruryJohn The Nights of Labour: The Workers’ Dream in Nineteenth-Century France 1989 [1981] Philadelphia Temple University Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RayDebidas ‘The Small Lessor and the Big Lessee: The Evidence from West Bengal’ Economic and Political Weekly Review of Agriculture 1978 13 51/52 A119 A121 A124

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RosaldoRenato CliffordJamesMarcusGeorge E. ‘From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor’ Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography 1986 Berkeley University of California

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RubinIsaak Illich SamardžijaMilošPerlmanFredy Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value 1972 [1928] Detroit Black and Red

  • RudraAshok ‘Share-Cropping Arrangements in Western Bengal’ Economic and Political Weekly 1975 10 39 A58 A63

  • SartreJean-Paul Sheridan-SmithAlan Critique of Dialectical Reason I: Theory of Practical Ensembles 1976 [1960] London Verso

  • ScottJames C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance 1985 New Haven Yale University Press

  • ScottJames C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts 1990 New Haven Yale University Press

  • ScottJoan W. ‘On Language, Gender, and Working-Class History’ International Labor and Working-Class History 1987 31 1 13

  • SewellW.H. KayeMcClelland ‘How Classes are Made: Critical Reflections on E.P. Thompson’s Theory of Working-Class Formation’ 1990 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SteinbergMarc KayeMcClelland ‘ “A Way of Struggle”: Reformations and Affirmations of E.P. Thompson’s Class Analysis in the Light of Postmodern Theories of Language and Superstructure’ 1990 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SteinfeldRobert The Invention of Free Labour: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and Culture 1350–1870 1991 Chapel Hill University of North Carolina Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SteinfeldRobert Coercion Contract and Free Labour in the Nineteenth Century 2001 Cambridge Cambridge University Press

  • SteinfeldRobert J.EngermanStanley L. BrassTomvan der LindenMarcel ‘Labour – Free or Coerced?’ Free and Unfree Labour: The Debate Continues 1997 Berne Peter Lang

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThompsonEdward Palmer Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act 1977 Harmondsworth Penguin

  • ThompsonEdward Palmer The Making of the English Working Class 1980 [1963] Harmondsworth Penguin

  • ThompsonEdward Palmer Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture 1991 London Merlin Press

  • TuschlingBurkhard ‘Production Relations, Law and State’ 1979 mimeograph translated by Jagabandhu Acharya

  • UngerRoberto Mangabeira The Critical Legal Studies Movement 1983 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press

  • WoodE.M. KayeMcClelland ‘Falling through the Cracks: E.P. Thompson and the Debate on Base and Superstructure’ 1990 1990

  • YeoEileenYeoStephen Popular Culture and Class Conflict 1590–1914: Explorations in the History of Labour and Leisure 1981 Brighton Harvester Press

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Banaji 197219731975 1976a 1976b 1977a and 1977b. Not all these essays are part of the collection Theory as History. In his earliest piece (1972) production relations are differentiated from relations of exploitation in the following terms: ‘We may define relations of exploitation as the particular form in which surplus is appropriated from the direct producers . . . Relations of production on the other hand are the specific historically determined form which particular relations of exploitation assume due to a certain level of development of the productive forces to the predominance of particular property forms (feudal landed property etc.) and so on. Thus in the strict sense feudalism is not the same as serfdom . . . capitalism cannot be defined in terms of the existence or non-existence of wage labour for the latter is only transformed into the capitalist relation of production under certain historical connections . . .’ In his later essays the notion of relations of production is specified slightly differently emphasising the logic and rationality more emphatically. See Banaji 1976a.

  • 5.

    Banaji 1977a.

  • 6.

    Banaji 1976a.

  • 7.

    Banaji 2001; also Banaji 2010Chapters 6–8.

  • 8.

    Banaji 2010Chapter 9.

  • 9.

    Banaji 2010. See in particular Chapter 3.

  • 12.

    Banaji 2010.

  • 13.

    Martinez-Alier 1971.

  • 15.

    See Martinez-Alier 1977 and 1978.

  • 16.

    Martinez-Alier 1977pp. 45ff.

  • 17.

    Martinez-Alier 1977p. 45.

  • 21.

    Banaji 2010p. 131.

  • 22.

    Banaji 2010pp. 133–4.

  • 23.

    Banaji 2010p. 131.

  • 24.

    Banaji 2010p. 132.

  • 26.

    Marx 1971p. 717.

  • 27.

    Steinfeld and Engerman 1997.

  • 28.

    Steinfeld 1991 and 2001.

  • 29.

    Rancière 1989.

  • 30.

    de Certeau 1988; Rancière 1989.

  • 32.

    Steinfeld 1991 and 2001.

  • 33.

    Steinfeld and Engerman 1997.

  • 34.

    Kennedy 19851998 and 2002; Steinfeld 1991 and 2001.

  • 37.

    Rubin 1972; Tuschling 1979.

  • 38.

    Marx 1971p. 77.

  • 39.

    Banaji 2010p. 106.

  • 40.

    See Burke 1986 and 1990; Chartier 1988Chapter 1; LaCapra 1985; Rosaldo 1986.

  • 41.

    Yeo and Yeo 1981.

  • 43.

    Banaji 2010p. 42.

  • 44.

    Breman 1979.

  • 46.

    Prakash 1990.

  • 47.

    Banaji 1976a.

  • 48.

    Kula 1976.

  • 49.

    Banaji 1976b.

  • 51.

    Banaji 2010pp. 46–7.

  • 52.

    Banaji 2010p. 112.

  • 53.

    Bengal Land Revenue Commission 1940ap. 69.

  • 55.

    Bengal Land Revenue Commission 1940b.

  • 56.

    Bhattacharya 1983. On the complicated picture in India after Independence see Ray 1978; Rudra 1975; Bardhan and Rudra 1980; Bhaduri 1983.

  • 57.

    Banaji 2010p. 6.

  • 58.

    Banaji 1977a; Banaji 2010Chapter 10. The argument is developed also in Banaji 2010 Chapter 12.

  • 59.

    Banaji 2010p. 103.

  • 60.

    See Banaji 2010pp. 43–4. Banaji ends his conclusion to the book with the following argument: ‘In short the theoretical distinction we need here is one between capitalism in this more general sense a sense which allows for the commercial capitalism of the twelfth to eighteenth centuries and what Marx himself called the “capitalist mode of production”. The latter is only a historically developed form of capitalism in the more general sense which in this way acquires a wider purchase and helps resolve problems that continue to mystify Marxists.’ (Banaji 2010 p. 358.) The linear schema of the succession of modes made familiar by the transition debate is replaced here with a different linearity. The shift is from the ‘initial stages’ to ‘developed’ forms capitalism in the general sense to the specifically capitalist mode of production. Emerging in embryonic forms operating in diverse configurations capital ultimately matures into forms that are seen as typical to the fully developed capitalist mode of production.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 108 108 13
Full Text Views 100 100 3
PDF Downloads 35 35 1
EPUB Downloads 30 30 0