In this article, I investigate a hypothesis concerning the supposed influence of Spinoza on Marx’s works. Setting out from a comment made by Althusser – ‘[Spinoza] is the only direct ancestor of Marx’ – I try to demonstrate that even though the relationship between Spinoza and Marx has limited support at a historiographical level, a determined set of ideas of Spinoza can be connected to some of Marx’s political objectives in the period prior to 1845. This argument is supported through Marx’s notebooks devoted to studying Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise, written in 1841, and his refutation of Spinoza in The Holy Family. However, contrary to what could be expected, when Marx abandoned his most pronounced idealistic phase, within which Spinoza played a certain role, he rebelled against Spinozism at the same time. Nonetheless, it is one thing to repudiate Spinoza’s name, and a very different thing to repudiate Spinoza’s ideas.
BoveLaurent2012 ‘Bêtes ou Automates. La différence anthropologique dans la politique spinoziste’ in Lectures contemporaines de Spinoza edited by Pierre-FrançoisMoreauParis: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.
HegelGeorg Wilhelm Friedrich1995b  Lectures on the History of PhilosophyVolume 3 Medieval and Modern Philosophy translated by E.S.Haldane and Frances H.SimsonLincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
JacobiFriedrich Heinrich1994  ‘Concerning the Doctrine of Spinoza in Letters to Herr Moses Mendelssohn’ in The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill edited by Georgedi GiovanniQuébec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
ToselAndré2007 ‘Pour une étude systématique du rapport de Marx à Spinoza: remarques et hypothèses’ in Spinoza au XIXe siècle edited by Pierre-FrançoisMoreau and JeanSalemParis: Publications de la Sorbonne.