Money versus Value?

Reconsidering the ‘Monetary Approach’ of the ‘post’-Uno School, Benetti/Cartelier, and the Neue Marx-Lektüre

In: Historical Materialism
View More View Less
  • 1 Institute of Asian and Oriental Studies, University of Zurich

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

Even after the demise of the influential Uno School in the 1980s, Japanese economists have been continuously engaged in the categorial reconstruction of Marx’s Critique of Political Economy, especially the theory of value and money. Writing in the 1980s–2000s, authors of the ‘post-Uno School’, such as Ebitsuka Akira, Mukai Kimitoshi, Kataoka Kōji etc., broadened the value-theoretical views of Uno School orthodoxy to include, among others, the Neue Marx-Lektüre (predominantly H.-G. Backhaus and M. Heinrich) and the French economists C. Benetti and J. Cartelier.

This paper will confront the ‘post-Uno School’s’ reading of Marx’s theory of value, which poses the theories of value and money as unreconcilable, leading them to discard the theory of value in favour of a ‘monetary approach’. We show that the dismissal of value theory leads to an introduction of Baileyan and neoclassical elements into Marx’s theory, which we believe to be both theoretically and practically precarious.

  • Aglietta, Michel 1976, Régulation et crises du capitalisme. L’expérience des Etats-Unis, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

  • Albritton, Robert 1986, A Japanese Reconstruction of Marxist Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Albritton, Robert 1991, A Japanese Approach to Stages of Capitalist Development, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Albritton, Robert, Makoto Itoh, Richard Westra and Alan Zuege (eds.) 2001, Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crises and Globalization, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Albritton, Robert and Thomas T. Sekine (eds.) 1995, A Japanese Approach to Political Economy: Unoist Variations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Albritton, Robert and John Simoulidis (eds.) 2003, New Dialectics and Political Economy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Arthur, Christopher J. 2006, ‘Money and Exchange’, Capital & Class, 90: 735.

  • Backhaus, Hans-Georg 1978, ‘Materialien zur Rekonstruktion der Marxschen Werttheorie’, in Gesellschaft. Beiträge zur Marxschen Theorie. Band 11, edited by Hans-Georg Backhaus, G. Brandt and G. Diel, pp. 16177, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Backhaus, Hans-Georg 2011, Dialektik der Wertform, Freiburg: ça ira.

  • Barshay, Andrew E. 2004, The Social Sciences in Modern Japan: The Marxian and Modernist Traditions, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bellofiore, Riccardo 1989, ‘A Monetary Labor Theory of Value’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 21, 1–2: 125.

  • Benetti, Carlo 1985, ‘Economie monétaire et économie de troc: la question de l’unité de compte commune’, Economie Appliquée, 1: 85109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benetti, Carlo 1990, Moneda y teoría de valor, Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  • Benetti, Carlo and Jean Cartelier 1980, Marchands, Salariat et Capitalistes, Paris: Éditions La Découverte.

  • Benetti, Carlo and Jean Cartelier 1998, ‘Money, Form and Determination of Value’, in Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal. Essays on Volume 3 of Capital. Volume 1: Value, Method, and Money, edited by Riccardo Bellofiore, pp. 157171, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benetti, Carlo and Jean Cartelier 2013, ‘After thirty years...’, in New Contributions to Monetary Analysis: The Foundations of an Alternative Economic Paradigm, edited by Faruk Ülgen, Ramon Tortajada, Matthieu Méaulle and Rémi Stellian, London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brentel, Helmut 1989, Soziale Form und ökonomisches Objekt. Studien zum Gegenstands- und Methodenverständnis der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cartelier, Jean 1976, Surproduit et réproduction. La formation de l’économie politique classique, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires Grenoble (Maspero).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cartelier, Jean 1991, ‘Marx’s Theory of Value, Exchange and Surplus Value: A Suggested Reformulation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15: 257269.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Vroey, Michel 1981, ‘Value, Production, and Exchange’, in Steedman et al. 1981, pp. 173201.

  • Ebitsuka Akira 1982, ‘Uno “Genriron” Taikei to “Seisanron” ni okeru Kachihōsoku no “Ronshō” [The “Proof” of the Law of Value in Uno’s System of the “Theory of Principles” and the “Theory of Production”]’, Hitotsubashi ronsō, 88, 2: 265281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ebitsuka Akira 1984, ‘Kahei to keizaigaku hihan. Benetti/Cartelier ni yoru keizaigaku hihan no puroburematikku [Money and the Critique of Political Economy: The Problematic of the Critique of Political Economy according to Benetti/Cartelier]’, Hitotsubashi ronsō, 91, 5: 679697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Elbe, Ingo 2008, Marx im Westen. Die neue Marx-Lektüre in der Bundesrepublik seit 1965, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

  • Engels, Frederick 1980 [1859], ‘Review of “Karl Marx: A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy”’, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 16, pp. 465477, London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engster, Frank 2014, Das Geld als Mass, Mittel und Methode. Das Rechnen mit der Identität der Zeit, Berlin: Neofelis Verlag.

  • Furihata, Setsuo (ed.) 1989, Senjika no teikō to jiritsu: Sōzōteki sengo e no taidō [Resistance and Independence in Times of War: Signs Towards a Creative Post-War Era], Tokyo: Shakai Hyōronsha.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harvey, David 2018, ‘Marx’s Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value’, available at: <http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinrich, Michael 1988, ‘Was ist die Werttheorie noch wert? Zur neueren Debatte um das Transformationsproblem und die Marxsche Werttheorie’, Prokla, Heft 72, 18. Jg., Nr. 3, pp. 1538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinrich, Michael 1991, Die Wissenschaft vom Wert. Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition, Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinrich, Michael 1999, Die Wissenschaft vom Wert. Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition, Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoff, Jan 2017, Marx Worldwide: On the Development of the International Discourse on Marx since 1965, translated by Nicholas Gray, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Itoh, Makoto 1976, ‘A Study of Marx’s Theory of Value’, Science and Society, 40, 3: 307340.

  • Kataoka Kōji 1994, ‘Kahei seisanron no hihanteki kentō. Kahei no sonzairon josetsu [A Critical Examination of the Theory of the Genesis of Money: An Introduction to the Ontology of Money]’, Keizaigaku Zasshi, 95, 3/4: 133153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kawamura Tetsuji et al. 2016, Gurobaru shihonshugi to dankairon: Marukusu keizaigaku no gendaiteki kadai [Global Capitalism and Stage Theory: The Present Assignment of Marxian Political Economy], Collection 2, Volume 2, Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobō.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange, Elena Louisa 2014, ‘Failed Abstraction: The Problem of Uno Kōzō’s Reading of Marx’s Theory of the Value Form’, Historical Materialism, 22, 1: 333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange, Elena Louisa 2016, ‘The Critique of Political Economy and the New Dialectic: Hegel, Marx, and Christopher J. Arthur’s “Homology Thesis”’, Crisis & Critique, 3, 3: 235272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange, Elena Louisa 2017, ‘Geldtheorie ohne Fetischcharakter. Zur problematischen Rezeption des ersten Kapitalbandes bei Uno Kōzō und der Uno-Schule’, Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, 4, 1–2: 177208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange, Elena Louisa 2018, ‘Capital’, in The Bloomsbury Companion to Marx, edited by Jeff Diamanti, Andrew Pendakis and Imre Szeman, pp. 273280, London: Bloomsbury.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lange, Elena Louisa 2019, ‘The Proof Is in the Pudding: On the Necessity of Presupposition in Marx’s Critical Method’, in Marx Inattuale, edited by Riccardo Bellofiore and Carla Maria Fabiani, pp. 153174, Consecutio Rerum Book Series, Rome: Edizioni Efesto.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, Karl 1973 [1857–1858], Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft), translated by Martin Nicolaus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, Karl 1976 [1867], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One, translated by Ben Fowkes, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  • Marx, Karl 1979 [1861–1863], Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Manuskript 1861–1863), in Teil 4. Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe, Zweite Abteilung: Das Kapital und Vorarbeiten, Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, Karl 1983 [1867], Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band, in Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe, Zweite Abteilung: Das Kapital und Vorarbeiten, Band 5, Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, Karl 1989 [1861–1863], 1861–63 Economic Manuscripts [Theories of Surplus Value, Volume 3], in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 32, London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marx, Karl 2008 [1867], Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals, in Marx-Engels-Werke, Band 23, Berlin: Dietz.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masaki Hachirō 1986, ‘Marxsche Wertformtheorie als notwendige Kombination zweier Methoden: eine methodologische Reflexion’, Osaka City University Economic Review, 21: 1941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masaki Hachirō 1992, ‘Marukusu no kaheishōhinron saikō [Reconsidering Marx’s Theory of the Money Commodity]’, Keizaigaku zasshi, 93, 2: 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mavrouedas, Stavros 2017, ‘Is Cartelier’s Monetary Approach a Convincing Alternative to the Labour Theory of Value? A Comment’, Economic Thought, 6, 2: 4552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moseley, Fred 1998, ‘A Critique of Benetti’s Critique of Marx’s Derivation of the Necessity of Money’, available at: <http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/working%20papers/BENETTI.pdf>, accessed 7 January 2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moseley, Fred 2016, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in ‘Capital’ and the End of the ‘Transformation Problem’, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukai Kimitoshi 1990, ‘Chūshōteki ningen rōdō no sonzairon [The Ontology of Abstract Human Labour]’, Dōshisha shōgaku, 42, 2: 4890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukai Kimitoshi 1992, ‘Rūbin igo no Marukusu [Rubin After Marx]’, Dōshisha shōgaku, 44, 3: 67117.

  • Mukai Kimitoshi 1995, ‘Kahei no Genshōgaku (jō). Marukusu Kachiron no Puroburematīku [The Phenomenology of Money (Part One). The Problematic of Marx’s Theory of Value]’, Dōshisha Shōgaku, 46, 5/6: 85131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukai Kimitoshi 1996, ‘Kahei no Genshōgaku (ka). Marukusu Kachiron no Puroburematīku [The Phenomenology of Money (Part Two). The Problematic of Marx’s Theory of Value]’, Dōshisha Shōgaku, 48, 3: 5393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukai Kimitoshi 2010, Kahei to chinrōdō no saiteigi – Itanha Marukusu keizaigaku no keifu [Redefining Money and Wage Labour – The Genealogy of the Heterodox Marxian Critique of Political Economy], Tokyo: Mineruba Shobō.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mukai Kimitoshi 2014, ‘New Readings of Capital in Japan since the 1960s – My Personal Retrospect’, unpublished manuscript: available upon request.

  • Murray, Patrick 2016, The Mismeasure of Wealth: Essays on Marx and Social Form, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

  • Reuten, Geert 1993, ‘The Difficult Labor of a Theory of Social Value: Metaphors and Systematic Dialectics at the Beginning of Marx’s Capital’, in Marx’s Method in Capital: A Reexamination, edited by Fred Moseley, pp. 89113, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sasaki Ryūji 2011, Marukusu no Busshōkaron. Shihonshugi hihan to shite no sozai no shisō [Marx’s Theory of Reification: Criticising Capitalism as the Thought of the Material], Tokyo: Shakai Hyōronsha.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sekine, Thomas T. 1997, An Outline of The Dialectic of Capital, two volumes, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Sobel, Richard and Nicolas Postel 2014, ‘Conceptualising the Labour–Money Connection: A Critical Re-examination of Benetti and Cartelier’s Marchands, salariat et capitalistes’, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 7, 1: 5685.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steedman, Ian et al. 1981, The Value Controversy, London: Verso.

  • Umezawa Naoki 1991, Kachiron no Potensharu [The Potential of Value Theory], Tokyo: Shōwadō.

  • Umezawa Naoki 1997, ‘Kachikeitairon no minaoshi no tameni [For a Reconsideration of Value-Form Analysis]’, Hikone ronsō, 331: 103120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Umezawa Naoki 2012, ‘Kaheiron no teiki suru hōhōronteki mondai wo megutte [The Methodological Problems Caused by Money Theory]’, Hikone ronsō, 394: 162173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uno Kōzō 1964, Keizai Genron [Principles of Political Economy], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

  • Uno Kōzō 1973 [1951], Keizai Genron I [Principles of Political Economy, I], in Uno Kōzō Chosakushū Dai Ikkan [Collected Works of Uno Kōzō, Volume 1], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uno Kōzō 1974 [1962], Keizaigaku Hōhōron [The Methodology of Political Economy], in Uno Kōzō Chosakushū Dai Kyūkan [Collected Works of Uno Kōzō, Volume 9], Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uno Kōzō 1980, Principles of Political Economy: Theory of a Purely Capitalist Society, translated and introduced by Thomas T. Sekine, Brighton: Harvester Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Uno Kōzō 2016, The Types of Economic Policies Under Capitalism, translated by Thomas T. Sekine, edited by John R. Bell, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Urban, William J. 2010, ‘Commentary on Jean Cartelier’s “Marx’s Theory of Value, Exchange and Surplus Value: A Suggested Reformulation’, York University course paper, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/1123509/Commentary_on_Jean_Cartelier_s_Marx_s_theory_of_value_exchange_and_surplus_value_a_suggested_reformulation>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wolf, Dieter 2008, ‘Zur Methode in Marx’ Kapital unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres logisch-systematischen Charakters. Zum „Methodenstreit“ zwischen Wolfgang Fritz Haug und Michael Heinrich’, Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen des Berliner Vereins zur Forderung der MEGA-Edition, Heft 6: Gesellschaftliche Praxis und ihre wissenschaftliche Darstellung. Beiträge zur ,Kapital‘-Diskussion, Berlin, pp. 7186, available at: <http://www.dieterwolf.net/pdf/Methodenstreit_Haug_Heinrich.pdf>.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1691 1691 118
Full Text Views 132 132 9
PDF Downloads 104 104 9