Pyrrhonism and the Dialectical Methods

The Aims and Argument of Outlines of Pyrrhonism II

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Justin Vlasits Philosophisches Seminar, Philosophische Fakultät, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Tübingen Deutschland

Search for other papers by Justin Vlasits in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The aim of this paper is to show how Outlines of Pyrrhonism II constitutes an original, ambitious, and unified skeptical inquiry into logic. My thesis is that Sextus’ argument in Book II is meant to accomplish both its stated goal (to investigate the topics typically grouped together by dogmatists under the heading of “logic”) and an unstated goal. The unstated goal is, in my view, interesting in itself and sheds new light on Sextus’ methodology. The goal is: to suspend judgement on the effectiveness of dogmatic methodologies.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 417 118 8
Full Text Views 11 3 1
PDF Views & Downloads 34 15 3