Beyond Expansion or Restriction? Models of Interaction between the Living Instrument and Margin of Appreciation Doctrines and the Scope of the echr

In: International Human Rights Law Review
Authors: Rachael Ita1 and David Hicks2
View More View Less
  • 1 PhD, Senior Lecturer in Law, Leicester De Montfort Law School, De Montfort University Leicester, Leicester, UK,
  • | 2 PhD, Senior Lecturer in Criminology, School of Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK,
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The living instrument doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is criticised as restricting the margin of appreciation of States and expanding the scope of the European Convention on Human Rights (echr). Systematic examination of this claim is usually overlooked in the context of the relationship between the admissibility and merits phase of ECtHR cases. This article considers this claim in the context of jurisdictional arguments on incompatibility ratione materiae (subject matter outside the scope of the Convention) and the link to the merits of the case. Case law of the ECtHR from January 1979 to December 2016 is assessed to elaborate four models of interaction between the margin of appreciation and living instrument doctrines. The article argues the need to go beyond consideration of expansion and restriction of the scope of the echr, and to assess the Court’s appetite for allocating new duties to States based upon the case arguments and positioning of living instrument and margin of appreciation doctrines.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 144 144 18
Full Text Views 7 7 4
PDF Views & Downloads 23 23 9