GLIMPSE 2.0: a framework to feed the world
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Aidan J. Connolly in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Luiz R. Sodre in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Kate Phillips-Connolly in
Current site
Google Scholar
Five years ago a new acronym GLIMPSE was proposed in the International Food and Agribusiness Management Review to summarize the seven barriers faced by agriculture in its quest to feed the world, based on interviews of 25 agribusiness experts. Through an iterative, grounded theory methodology the original research that led to the GLIMPSE framework was validated, deepened and expanded. The new research made minor revisions to the original GLIMPSE, but confirmed it as an effective framework to explain to an interested public how agriculture can tackle the planet’s nutritional requirements if certain constraints are addressed. Specifically, international policy makers, governments, non-governmental organization, charities, industry organizations, integrated food companies and farmers often struggle to explain the complex challenges agribusiness faces, and in this respect the GLIMPSE framework allows all stakeholders to describe the main challenges agriculture faces on its journey to feed almost 10 billion people by 2050.
-
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 2012. Annual Letter. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jgm4hve.
-
Boehlje, M., M. Roucan-Kaneb and S. Bröringc. 2011. Future Agribusiness challenges: strategic uncertainty, innovation and structural change. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14: 53-82.
'Future Agribusiness challenges: strategic uncertainty, innovation and structural change ' () 14 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 53 -82.
-
Bourgeois, R. 2014. Food (in)security: the new challenges ahead. document de travail ART-Dev, Art-Dev.
'Food (in)security: the new challenges ahead', ().
-
Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research methods, 4th ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.
Social Research methods , ().
-
Connolly, A.J. 2016. A CRISPR Opportunity: is this the end of transgenic GMOs in our food? Available at: http://tinyurl.com/gruhm92.
-
Connolly, A.J. and K. Phillips-Connolly. 2012. Can agribusiness feed 3 billion new people … and save the planet? A GLIMPSE™ into the future. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 15: 139-152.
'Can agribusiness feed 3 billion new people … and save the planet? A GLIMPSE™ into the future ' () 15 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 139 -152.
-
Consumer Reports National Research Center. 2015. Natural food labels survey – 2015 nationally-representative phone survey. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/j7duxk2.
-
Davis, J.H. and R.A. Goldberg. 1957. A concept of agribusiness. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
'A concept of agribusiness', ().
-
Dobbs, R., J. Manyika and J. Woetzel. 2015. No ordinary disruption: the four global forces breaking all the trends. Public Affairs Books, New York, NY, USA.
'No ordinary disruption: the four global forces breaking all the trends', ().
-
Economics of Land Degradation Initiative (ELD). 2013. A global strategy for sustainable land management. The rewards of investing in sustainable land management. ELD, Bonn, Germany , p. 12.
-
European Commission (EC). 2014a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe. /* COM/2014/0398 final/2 */. . Available at: http://tinyurl.com/hf4fme4.
-
European Commission (EC). 2014b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment. COM/2015/0593 final – 2015/0272 (COD). Available at: http://tinyurl.com/o6jlym4.
-
European Commission (EC). 2015. Circular economy strategy. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/mrgoa47.
-
Glaser, B.G. and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research , ().
-
Juma, C. 2012. Poor Infrastructure is Africa’s soft underbelly. Forbes. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/zzj9utw
-
Lakner, Z G.A. and Baker. 2014. Struggling with uncertainty: the state of global agri-food sector in 2030. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 17: 141-176.
'Struggling with uncertainty: the state of global agri-food sector in 2030 ' () 17 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 141 -176.
-
Lipinski, B., C. Hanson, J. Lomax, L. Kitinoja, R. Waite and T. Searchinger. 2013. Installment 2 of ‘creating a sustainable food future – reducing food loss and waste’. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
'Installment 2 of ‘creating a sustainable food future – reducing food loss and waste’', ().
-
McKenzie, F.C. and J. Williams. 2015. Sustainable food production: constraints, challenges and choices by 2050. Journal of Food Security 7: 221-233.
'Sustainable food production: constraints, challenges and choices by 2050 ' () 7 Journal of Food Security : 221 -233.
-
Meng, Q., P. Hou, L. Wu, X. Chen, Z. Cui and F. Zhang. 2013. Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Research 143: 91-97.
'Understanding production potentials and yield gaps in intensive maize production in China ' () 143 Field Crops Research : 91 -97.
-
National Wildlife Health Center. 2016. Avian Influenza in poultry. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/ycbav7.
-
Pew Research Center. 2015. Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/m7ktyng.
-
PwC. 2015. Agribusinesses Insights Survey 2014/2015. Africa – are you in for the ride? Available at: http://tinyurl.com/hy8b5zv.
-
Rabobank. 2015. Succession: keeping the family farm alive. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/h9pk4d3.
-
Rezende, G.C., L.R. Ferreira and A.C. Kreter. 2009. Labor legislation and its adverse impacts on transaction costs in Brazilian agriculture. Working Papers 06/2009. Columbia University – ILAS, New York, NY, USA. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI). 2013. Land footprint Scenarios, p. 13. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jt65s5v.
-
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Every family needs a farmer. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/haw5s8n.
-
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2015. Update on avian influenza findings: Poultry findings confirmed by USDA’s National veterinary services laboratories. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/j5wu4q7.
-
Vervoort, J.M., P.K. Thornton, P. Kristjanson, W. Forch, P.J. Ericksen, K. Kok, J.S.I. Ingram, M. Herrero, A. Palazzo, A.E.S. Helfgott, A. Wilkinson, P. Havlik, D. Mason-D’Croz, D. and C. Jost. 2014. Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change. Global Environmental Change 28: 383-394
'Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change ' () 28 Global Environmental Change : 383 -394.
-
Waltz, E. 2016. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/jv56vq7.
-
Wheeler, T. and J. Von Braun. 2013. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341: 508-513.
'Climate change impacts on global food security ' () 341 Science : 508 -513.
-
World Economic Forum (WEF). 2015. Global Risks 2015. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/h77d8cr.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 155 | 120 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 107 | 59 | 3 |
GLIMPSE 2.0: a framework to feed the world
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Aidan J. Connolly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luiz R. Sodre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kate Phillips-Connolly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Five years ago a new acronym GLIMPSE was proposed in the International Food and Agribusiness Management Review to summarize the seven barriers faced by agriculture in its quest to feed the world, based on interviews of 25 agribusiness experts. Through an iterative, grounded theory methodology the original research that led to the GLIMPSE framework was validated, deepened and expanded. The new research made minor revisions to the original GLIMPSE, but confirmed it as an effective framework to explain to an interested public how agriculture can tackle the planet’s nutritional requirements if certain constraints are addressed. Specifically, international policy makers, governments, non-governmental organization, charities, industry organizations, integrated food companies and farmers often struggle to explain the complex challenges agribusiness faces, and in this respect the GLIMPSE framework allows all stakeholders to describe the main challenges agriculture faces on its journey to feed almost 10 billion people by 2050.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 155 | 120 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 107 | 59 | 3 |
