Who’s responsible here? US resident perceptions of food retailer social responsibility
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Nicole Olynk Widmar in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Christopher A. Wolf in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Carissa, J. Morgan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by W. Scott Downey in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Candace C. Croney in
Current site
Google Scholar
Perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) for prominent food retailers (Walmart, Costco, Kroger, Target, Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and Amazon.com) were analyzed through best-worst scaling methodology, which resulted in a relative ranking of perceived CSR for each retailer. Seemingly unrelated regression was used to investigate determinants of CSR rankings by the sample of 299 US residents. Of the retailers included in this analysis, Whole Foods was perceived to be the most socially responsible (37%), followed by Trader Joe’s (16%). Respondent characteristics, including gender, children in household, knowledge of retail food business practices, and familiarity with particular food retailers were determinants of the relative CSR rankings. Understanding relationships between demographics and perceptions of food retailers contributes to understanding consumer preferences and demands, which may inform firm decisions.
-
Assiouras, I., O. Ozgen and G. Skourtis. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility in food industry in product-harm crises. British Food Journal 115 (1): 108-123.
'The impact of corporate social responsibility in food industry in product-harm crises ' () 115 British Food Journal : 108 -123.
-
Bolton, L.E. and A.S. Mattila. 2015. How does corporate social responsibility affect consumer response to service failure in buyer-seller relationships? Journal of Retailing 91 (1): 140-153.
'How does corporate social responsibility affect consumer response to service failure in buyer-seller relationships? ' () 91 Journal of Retailing : 140 -153.
-
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2015. Consumer expenditures – 2014. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cesan.nr0.htm.
-
Cummins, A.M., N.J.O. Widmar, C.C. Croney, and J.R. Fulton. 2016. Understanding consumer pork attribute preferences. Theoretical Economic Letters 6: 166-177.
'Understanding consumer pork attribute preferences ' () 6 Theoretical Economic Letters : 166 -177.
-
De Magistris, T., E. Groot, A. Gracia and L. Albisu. 2011. Consumers preference for wine in spain: best-worst scaling methodology. Paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2011 congress, change and uncertainty. Available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/114449/2/de%20Magistris_ Tiziana_211.pdf
-
Deselnicu, O., M. Cstanigro and D. Thilmany 2012. Corporate social responsibility initiatives and consumer preference in the dairy industry. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association’s 2012. Available at: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/124616/2/Costanigro1AAEA%202012.pdf.
-
Dlott, J., D. Gunders and A. Arnold. 2006. Sustainability trends in the agrifood sector. Sure Harvest Briefing Paper. Soquel, California, CA, USA.
'Sustainability trends in the agrifood sector ', in Sure Harvest Briefing Paper , ().
-
Erdem, S., D. Rigby and A. Wossink. 2012. Using best-worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety. Food Policy 37: 661-670.
'Using best-worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety ' () 37 Food Policy : 661 -670.
-
Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, California, CA, USA.
A theory of cognitive dissonance , ().
-
Flynn, T.N. 2010. Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling. Expert Review Pharmacroeconomics Outcomes Reserve 10 (3): 259-267.
'Valuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scaling ' () 10 Expert Review Pharmacroeconomics Outcomes Reserve : 259 -267.
-
Ganesan, S., M. George, S. Jap, R.W. Palmatier and B. Weitz. 2009. Supply chain management and retailer performance: emerging trends, issues, and implications for research and practice. Journal of Retailing 85 (1): 84-94.
'Supply chain management and retailer performance: emerging trends, issues, and implications for research and practice ' () 85 Journal of Retailing : 84 -94.
-
Grewal, D., A.L. Roggeveen, R. Sisodia J. and Nordfält. 2017. Enhancing customer engagement through consciousness. Journal of Retailing 93 (1): 55-64.
'Enhancing customer engagement through consciousness ' () 93 Journal of Retailing : 55 -64.
-
Hack, L., A.J. Kenyon and E.H. Wood. 2014. A critical corporate social responsibility (CSR) timeline: how should it be understood now. International Journal of Management Cases 16 (4): 46-55.
'A critical corporate social responsibility (CSR) timeline: how should it be understood now ' () 16 International Journal of Management Cases : 46 -55.
-
Hartmann, M. 2011. Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics 38 (2): 297-324.
'Corporate social responsibility in the food sector ' () 38 European Review of Agricultural Economics : 297 -324.
-
Jones, P., D. Comfort and D. Hillier. 2007. Marketing and corporate social responsibility within food stores. British Food Journal 109 (8): 582-593.
'Marketing and corporate social responsibility within food stores ' () 109 British Food Journal : 582 -593.
-
Kinley, T.R., B.M. Josiam and F. Lockett. 2010. Shopping behavior and the involvement construct. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 14 (4): 562-575.
'Shopping behavior and the involvement construct ' () 14 Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal : 562 -575.
-
Lee, H.H.M., E. Van Dolen and A. Kolk. 2013. On the role of social media in the ‘responsible’ food business: blogger buzz on health and obesity issues. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (4): 695-707.
'On the role of social media in the ‘responsible’ food business: blogger buzz on health and obesity issues ' () 118 Journal of Business Ethics : 695 -707.
-
Lee, M.-Y., A. Fairhurst and S. Wesley. 2009. Corporate social responsibility: a review of the top 100 us retailers. Corporate Reputation Review 12: 140-158.
'Corporate social responsibility: a review of the top 100 us retailers ' () 12 Corporate Reputation Review : 140 -158.
-
Lang, T. and M. Heasman. 2015. Food wars: the global battle for mouths, minds, and markets. Routledge, London, UK.
Food wars: the global battle for mouths, minds, and markets , ().
-
Louviere, J.J. 1993. The best-worst or maximum difference measurement model: applications in behavioral research in marketing. Paper presented at the American Marketing Association’s 1993 Behavioral Research Conference, Phoenix, AR, USA.
'The best-worst or maximum difference measurement model: applications in behavioral research in marketing', ().
-
Lusk, J.L. and B.C. Briggeman. 2009. Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (1): 184-196.
'Food values ' () 91 American Journal of Agricultural Economics : 184 -196.
-
Maloni, M. J. and M.E. Brown 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics 68: 35-52.
'Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry ' () 68 Journal of Business Ethics : 35 -52.
-
McKendree, M.G.S, N.O. Widmar, D. L. Ortega and K.A. Foster. 2013. Consumer preferences for verified pork-rearing practices in the production of ham products. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 38 (3): 397-417.
'Consumer preferences for verified pork-rearing practices in the production of ham products ' () 38 Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics : 397 -417.
-
Morgan, C.J., N.J.O. Widmar, E.A. Yeager, W.S. Downey and C.C. Croney. 2016a. Perceptions of social responsibility of prominent fast food restaurants. Modern Economy 7: 704-714.
'Perceptions of social responsibility of prominent fast food restaurants ' () 7 Modern Economy : 704 -714.
-
Morgan, C.J., S.R. Dominick, N.J.O. Widmar, E.A. Yeager and C.C. Croney. 2016b. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility of prominent fast food restaurants by university students. Journal of Food Distribution Research 47 (3): 18-31.
'Perceptions of corporate social responsibility of prominent fast food restaurants by university students ' () 47 Journal of Food Distribution Research : 18 -31.
-
Pechecy, R. and P. Monsivais. 2015. Supermarket choice, shopping behavior, socioeconomic status, and food purchases. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 49 (6): 868-877.
'Supermarket choice, shopping behavior, socioeconomic status, and food purchases ' () 49 American Journal of Preventative Medicine : 868 -877.
-
Sen, S. and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): 225-243.
'Does doing good always lead to doing better? ' () 38 Journal of Marketing Research : 225 -243.
-
Smith, N.C. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review 45 (4): 52-76.
'Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? ' () 45 California Management Review : 52 -76.
-
Wang, C. C. in press. Corporate social responsibility on customer behaviour: the mediating role of corporate image and customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1444985.
-
UCLA Statistical Consulting Group. 2015. Regressions with stata chapter 40 beyond OLS. Available at: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/chapter4/statareg4.htm.
-
US Census Bureau. 2014. State and country quick facts. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/map/US/INC110217.
-
US Census Bureau. 2016. Highest educational levels reached by adults in the U.S. since 1940. Available at: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/cb17-51.html.
Supplementary Materials
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 290 | 154 | 24 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 362 | 167 | 12 |
Who’s responsible here? US resident perceptions of food retailer social responsibility
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Nicole Olynk Widmar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christopher A. Wolf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carissa, J. Morgan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by W. Scott Downey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Candace C. Croney in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) for prominent food retailers (Walmart, Costco, Kroger, Target, Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and Amazon.com) were analyzed through best-worst scaling methodology, which resulted in a relative ranking of perceived CSR for each retailer. Seemingly unrelated regression was used to investigate determinants of CSR rankings by the sample of 299 US residents. Of the retailers included in this analysis, Whole Foods was perceived to be the most socially responsible (37%), followed by Trader Joe’s (16%). Respondent characteristics, including gender, children in household, knowledge of retail food business practices, and familiarity with particular food retailers were determinants of the relative CSR rankings. Understanding relationships between demographics and perceptions of food retailers contributes to understanding consumer preferences and demands, which may inform firm decisions.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 290 | 154 | 24 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 362 | 167 | 12 |
