The agricultural sector in Sweden, as elsewhere, is affected by increased intensification and specialisation, leading to fewer and larger farms. The majority of agricultural firms acquire profits by pushing an economies of scale strategy, which is not always possible for small farms. However, there are alternative strategies. This teaching case focuses on a small farm in Sweden and offers students an opportunity to study the management of business model innovation in this context. The case explores the value creation strategy of a cattle farm and applies activities such as mapping a business model, developing suggestions for business model innovation, analysing existing and lacking managerial competences and pinpointing implications for agricultural policy. As a result, profitability, competitiveness and sustainability of the study farm should be achieved, together with acquisition of knowledge and skills by its owner. This educational case is suitable for agricultural students of different levels requiring knowledge of business and management.
Barney, J.B. 1986a. Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review 11(3): 656-665. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306261
Barney, J.B. 1986b. Types of competition and the theory of strategy: toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 11(4): 791-800. https://doi.org/10.2307/258397
Belk, K.E., D.R. Woerner, R.J. Delmore, J.D. Tatum, H. Yang and J.N. Sofos. 2014. The meat industry: do we think and behave globally or locally? Meat Science 98: 556-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.023
Boons, F. and F. Lüdeke-Freund. 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
Bowler, I.R. 1986. Intensification, concentration and specialisation in agriculture: the case of the European Community. Geography 71(1): 14-24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40571039
Campos, H. (ed). 2021. The innovation revolution in agriculture: a roadmap to value creation. Springer Nature ltd, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50991-0
Davidova, S., M. Gorton, B. Iraizoz and T. Taringer. 2003. Variations in farm performance in transitional economies: evidence from the Chech Republic. Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(2): 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00061.x
Dimitri, C., A. Effland and N.C. Conklin. 2005. The 20th century transformation of US agriculture and farm policy. Economic Bulletin No. 3. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/44197/13566_eib3_1_.pdf?v=6621.6
DLF and Delfi. 2021. Dagligvarukartan 2021. (in Swedish). Available at: https://www.dlf.se/rapporter/dagligvarukartan-2020/
Dobermann, A. and R. Nelson. 2013. Opportunities and solutions for sustainable food production. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Paris, France.
'Opportunities and solutions for sustainable food production', ().
Hashem, S., G. Migliore, G. Schifani, E. Schimmenti and S. Padel. 2017. Motives for buying local, organic food through English box schemes. British Food Journal 120(7): 1600-1614. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2017-0426
Howard, P.H. 2008. Visualizing food system concentration and consolidation. Journal of Rural Social Science 24(2): 87-110.
'Visualizing food system concentration and consolidation ' () 24 Journal of Rural Social Science : 87 -110.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Iraizoz, B., M. Gorton and S. Davidova. 2007. Segmenting farms for analysing agricultural trajectories: a case study of the Navarra Region in Spain. Agricultural Systems 93(1-3): 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.05.002
Lado, A.A., N.G. Boyd and P. Wright. 1992. A competency-based model of sustainable competitive advantage: toward a conceptual integration. Journal of Management 18: 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800106
MacDonald, J.M., M. Ollinger, K.E. Nelson and C.R. Handy. 2000. Consolidation in U.S. meatpacking. Agricultural Economic Report No. 785. Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA.
'Consolidation in U.S. meatpacking', ().
Miralles, I., D. Dentoni and S. Pascucci. 2017. Understanding the organization of sharing economy in agrifood systems: evidence from alternative food networks in Valencia. Agriculture and Human Values 34: 833-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9778-8
Mitchell, D.W. and C.B. Coles. 2004. Business model innovation breakthrough moves. Journal of Business Strategy 25(1): 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/02756660410515976
Moore, D.R., M.-I. Cheng and A.R.J. Dainty. 2002. Competence, competency and competencies: performance assessment in organisations. Work Study 51: 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210441876
Murphy, S. 2008. Globalization and corporate concentration in the food and agriculture sector. Development 51: 527-533.
'Globalization and corporate concentration in the food and agriculture sector ' () 51 Development : 527 -533.
Nilsson, J. and L.W. Lind. 2015. Institutional changes in the Swedish meat industry. British Food Journal 117(10): 2501-2514. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2014-0378
Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD). 2018. Innovation, agricultural productivity and sustainability in Sweden. OECD food and agricultural reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085268-en
Osterwalder, A., Y. Pingneur and C.A. Tucci. 2005. Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16: 1. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol16/iss1/1/
Porter, M.E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal 12: 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
SCB. 2021. Statistics Sweden – facts on average salaries. Available at: https://scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverigei-siffror/utbildning-jobb-och-pengar/medelloner-i-sverige/
Sexton, R.J. 2000. Industrialization and consolidation in the US food sector: implications for competition and welfare. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 1087-1104.
'Industrialization and consolidation in the US food sector: implications for competition and welfare ' () 82 American Journal of Agricultural Economics : 1087 -1104.
Spendrup, S. and F. Fernqvist. 2019. Innovation in agri-food systems – a systematic mapping of the literature. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 10(5): 402-427. https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v10i5.28
Statistics Sweden. 2011. Food sales 2010. Official statistics Sweden, statistic message HA 24 SM 1101. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2p9ezetf
Statistics Sweden. 2021. Restaurangindex. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2p8969xx
Svenskt Kött. 2021. Köttmarknadsutveckling för nötkött (in Swedish). Available at: https://svensktkott.se/om-kott/statistik/kottproduktion-not-1/
Swedish Board of Agriculture & Statistics Sweden. 2021. Livsmedelskonsumtionen av animalier (meat consumption). Statistics Sweden, JO1301. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/2p974w8n
Swedish Board of Agriculture. 2017. Jordbrukets produktivitet och struktur – produktivitetstillväxt och strukturutveckling inom produktionen av griskött, nötkött och mjölk samt inom växtodlingen (2002-2014). (in Swedish). Available at: https://tinyurl.com/fyzz5d8p
Swedish Board of Agriculture. 2021. Statistics on approved slaughtered animals in Sweden, 2020. (in Swedish). Available at: https://tinyurl.com/47hfdjks
Teece, D.J., 2018. Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning 51: 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Tidd, J. and J. Bessant. 2013. Managing innovation, integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
'Managing innovation, integrating technological, market and organizational change', ().
Ulvenblad, P.O. 2021. Development of sustainable business models for innovation in the swedish agri-sector: resource-effective producer or stewardship-based entrepreneur? In: Campos, H. (ed.) The innovation revolution in agriculture: a roadmap to value creation. Springer Nature ltd, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 117-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50991-0
Ulvenblad, P.O., P. Ulvenblad and J. Tell. 2016. Green Innovation in the food value chain – will Goliath fix it – or do we need David? Paper (extended abstract) presented at the 61st International Council for Small Business (ICSB) World Conference. June 15-18, 2016. New Jersey/New York, USA.
Green Innovation in the food value chain – will Goliath fix it – or do we need David?
Ulvenblad, P., H. Barth, J. Cederholm Björklund, M. Hoveskog, P.-O. Ulvenblad and J. Ståhl. 2018. Barriers to business model innovation in the agri-food industry: a systematic literature review. Outlook on Agriculture 47(4): 308-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018811785
Ulvenblad, P.O., P. Ulvenblad and J. Tell. 2019. An overview of sustainable business models for innovation in Swedish agri-food production. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 16(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2018.1554590
Zoll, F., K. Specht., I. Optiz, R. Siebert, A. Piorr and I. Zasada. 2017. Individual choice or collective action? Exploring consumer motives for participating in alternative food networks. International Journal of Consumer Studies 42(1): 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12405
Zott, C. and R. Amit. 2010. Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Planning 43(2-3): 216-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
Zott, C., R. Amit and L. Massa. 2011. The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management 37(4): 1019-1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311406265
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 296 | 166 | 25 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 449 | 254 | 23 |
The agricultural sector in Sweden, as elsewhere, is affected by increased intensification and specialisation, leading to fewer and larger farms. The majority of agricultural firms acquire profits by pushing an economies of scale strategy, which is not always possible for small farms. However, there are alternative strategies. This teaching case focuses on a small farm in Sweden and offers students an opportunity to study the management of business model innovation in this context. The case explores the value creation strategy of a cattle farm and applies activities such as mapping a business model, developing suggestions for business model innovation, analysing existing and lacking managerial competences and pinpointing implications for agricultural policy. As a result, profitability, competitiveness and sustainability of the study farm should be achieved, together with acquisition of knowledge and skills by its owner. This educational case is suitable for agricultural students of different levels requiring knowledge of business and management.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 296 | 166 | 25 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 449 | 254 | 23 |