This study uses survey data from 651 farmers in China to study the impacts of moral hazard on rice harvest losses and we further study the differences of the impacts across farm scales. The results show that large-scale farms have lower harvest losses and the service providers have more serious attitude when harvesting. After addressing the endogeneity of moral hazard using instrumental variable approach, moral hazard increases harvest losses. However, this impact diminishes as farm size increases. These findings demonstrate the need to reduce moral hazard by increasing farm size, introducing intermediaries, and written contracts, etc.
Affognon, H., C. Mutungi, P. Sanginga and C. Borgemeister. 2015. Unpacking postharvest losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis. World Development 66: 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.002
Cai, J. and W.Y. Liu. 2019. Agricultural social service and opportunistic behavior: take agricultural machinery operation services as example. Reform 3: 18-29.
'Agricultural social service and opportunistic behavior: take agricultural machinery operation services as example ' () 3 Reform : 18 -29.
Cai, L. and L. Wang. 2021. Analysis on outsourcing service behavior of rice pest and disease control based on Heckman selection model: a case study of ten counties in Fujian province. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0254819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254819
China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. 2008. Regional layout planning of national superior agricultural products. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China.
Deng, X., D. Xu, M. Zeng and Y. Qi. 2020. Does outsourcing affect agricultural productivity of farmer households? Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review 12(4): 673-688. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-12-2018-0236
Dercon, S., D.O. Gilligan, J. Hoddinott and T. Woldehanna. 2009. The impact of roads and agricultural extension on consumption growth and poverty in fifteen Ethiopian villages. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(4): 1007-1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01325.x
Greeley, M. and L.J. Martin. 1986. Food, technology and employment: the farm-level post-harvest system in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics 37(3): 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1986.tb01602.x
Huan, M.L. and Y.X. Hou. 2020. Quality control contract model of service in agricultural production outsourcing. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management 19: 288-296. https://doi.org/10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2020.03.31
Igata, M., A. Hendriksen and W. Heijman. 2008. Agricultural outsourcing: a comparison between the Netherlands and Japan. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 2: 29-33. https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2008/1-2/4
Ji, C., H. Guo, S. Jin and J. Yang. 2017. Outsourcing agricultural production: evidence from rice farmers in Zhejiang Province. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170861. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170861
Jin, H., L. Li, X. Qian and Y. Zeng. 2020. Can rural e-commerce service centers improve farmers’ subject well-being? A new practice of ‘internet plus rural public services’ from China. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 23(5): 681-695. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2019.0217
Kaminski, J. and L. Christiaensen. 2014. Post-harvest loss in Sub-Saharan Africa – what do farmers say? Global Food Security 3(3-4): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.gfs.2014.10.002
Kaufmann, D., G. Mehrez and T. Gurgur. 2019. Voice or public sector management? An empirical investigation of determinants of public sector performance based on a survey of public officials. Journal of Applied Economics 22(1): 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627718
Kleibergen, F. and R. Paap. 2006. Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics 133(1): 97-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011
Lee, H.S., K. Sasaki, J.W. Kang, T. Sato, W.Y. Song and S.N. Ahn. 2017. Mesocotyl elongation is essential for seedling emergence under deep-seeding condition in rice. Rice 10(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-017-0173-2
Li, X.F., D. Huang and L.P. Wu. 2019. Study on grain harvest losses of different scales of farms – empirical analysis based on 3251 farmers in China. China Soft Science 8: 184-192.
'Study on grain harvest losses of different scales of farms – empirical analysis based on 3251 farmers in China ' () 8 China Soft Science : 184 -192.
Lu, Q. and X. Du. 2020. The outsourcing choice of agricultural production tasks: implications for food security – a multiple-task based approach. Selected paper presented at the 2020 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting. July 26-28, 2020. Kansas City, MO, USA. http://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.304333
Mi, Q., X.D. Li and J.Z. Gao. 2020. How to improve the welfare of smallholders through agricultural production outsourcing: evidence from cotton farmers in Xinjiang, Northwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production 256: 120636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120636
Otsuka, K., Y. Liu and F. Yamauchi. 2016. The future of small farms in Asia. Development Policy Review 34(3): 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12159
Picazo-Tadeo, A.J. and E. Reig-Martínez. 2006. Outsourcing and efficiency: the case of Spanish citrus farming. Agricultural Economics 35(2): 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00154.x
Qu, X., D. Kojima, L.P. Wu and M. Ando. 2021a. The losses in the rice harvest process: a review. Sustainability 13(17): 9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13179627
Qu, X., D. Kojima, Y. Nishihara, L.P. Wu and M. Ando. 2021b. Can harvest outsourcing services reduce field harvest losses of rice in China? Journal of Integrative Agriculture 20(5): 1396-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63263-4
Stock, J.H. and M. Yogo. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In: D.W.K. Andrews and J.H. Stock (eds.) Identification and inference for econometric models. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511614491.006
Wuepper, D., H. Yesigat Ayenew and J. Sauer. 2018. Social capital, income diversification and climate change adaptation: panel data evidence from rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(2): 458-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12237
Yang, J., Z.H. Huang, X.B. Zhang and T. Reardon. 2013. The rapid rise of cross-regional agricultural mechanization services in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(5): 1245-1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat027
Yi, Q. 2018. Adoption of agricultural mechanization services among maize farmers in China: impacts of population aging and off-farm employment. Selected paper presented at International Association of Agricultural Economists, 2018 Conference. July 28-August 2, 2018. Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.277541
Zhang, Q., B. Yan and X. Huo. 2018. What are the effects of participation in production outsourcing? Evidence from Chinese apple farmers. Sustainability 10(12): 4525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124525
Zhang, X.B., J. Yang and R. Thomas. 2017. Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture. China Economic Review 43: 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.012
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 178 | 113 | 19 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 71 | 6 |
This study uses survey data from 651 farmers in China to study the impacts of moral hazard on rice harvest losses and we further study the differences of the impacts across farm scales. The results show that large-scale farms have lower harvest losses and the service providers have more serious attitude when harvesting. After addressing the endogeneity of moral hazard using instrumental variable approach, moral hazard increases harvest losses. However, this impact diminishes as farm size increases. These findings demonstrate the need to reduce moral hazard by increasing farm size, introducing intermediaries, and written contracts, etc.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 178 | 113 | 19 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 71 | 6 |