International Humanitarian Law on the Periphery

Case of Non-state Armed Actors

In: Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies
Author: Hyeran Jo1
View More View Less
  • 1 Associate Professor of Political Science, Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA,
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Does international law matter on the periphery, where potential subjects are marginalized with uncertain legal status and without lawmaking power? Under what conditions would international law matter among the actors on the periphery, to be accepted as law, remain relevant, and eventually be complied with? By adopting an interdisciplinary perspective from international law and international relations, this article assesses how international humanitarian law (ihl) is accepted and adhered to among the non-state armed actors (nsaas). The author argues that international law matters on the periphery when two conditions are met. The first is when incentives of nsaas are compatible with ihl’s goal of restraint. The second is when the interpretation of ihl at the local level is consistent with international law at the global level. This article provides ample examples of nsaas’ words and deeds to illustrate the arguments.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 819 275 124
Full Text Views 73 13 1
PDF Views & Downloads 92 27 2